How is this not age discrimination?
How is this not age discrimination?
Author
Discussion

MitchT

Original Poster:

17,089 posts

233 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
At 43 I'm pondering a change of direction. Looks like plenty of interesting things to do in the RAF and training provided too. However, looking at some roles that I could be interested in, it's quickly obvious that I'm on a hiding to nothing.

Applicants must be ...

Cyberspace Communication Specialist - 16 – 35 years old

Driver - 17 – 29 years old

Air Operations (Control) Officer - 17.5 – 40 (Must attest before 41st birthday)

Etc.

I thought this kind of thing was illegal these days.

Alex Z

1,971 posts

100 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
It appears that the age discrimination legislation has a specific exemption for the armed forces.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governmen...

MitchT

Original Poster:

17,089 posts

233 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
Seems a bit silly. My fitness level exceeds that specified for the 17-29 age group (the toughest level) in the activities described and my BMI is bang-on in the middle of the band suggested. I'm pretty sure people who are already in the force don't suddenly become unfit for purpose on the day they wake up at an age exceeding the maximum entry age for their role!

98elise

31,466 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
When I was in the armed forces you retired at 40, and basic training was pretty tough. The average age of new joiners was about 18 so you would feel very out of place in your 40's!

Things may have changed though.

98elise

31,466 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
Alex Z said:
It appears that the age discrimination legislation has a specific exemption for the armed forces.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governmen...
Its funny how governments tell us that we can't judge people on age, but can make a case that sometimes it's appropriate to judge on age.

TonyRPH

13,472 posts

192 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
Age discrimination is alive and well in the private sector, they're just not as open about it.

Wait until you try changing jobs in your late 50's...

Your CV will be greeted with much enthusiasm and a telephone interview (with good feedback) will follow.

That then results in a face to face interview, which subsequently just falls flat...


speedyman

1,609 posts

258 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
Check out immigration rules to most countries, age discrimination is alive well there to.

Sheets Tabuer

21,051 posts

239 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
Best you can hope for is the threat of invasion at your age.


bigandclever

14,219 posts

262 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
MitchT said:
Seems a bit silly. My fitness level exceeds that specified for the 17-29 age group (the toughest level) in the activities described and my BMI is bang-on in the middle of the band suggested. I'm pretty sure people who are already in the force don't suddenly become unfit for purpose on the day they wake up at an age exceeding the maximum entry age for their role!
the MOD said:
The rationale for the exemption is that Armed Forces personnel need to be combat effective in order to meet a worldwide liability to deploy. Although, in itself, an individual’s age might not be the chief determinant of his or her effectiveness at a particular moment in time, it is a crucial factor in overall manpower planning in the Armed Forces. Maintaining the optimum balance of age and experience in the Armed Forces is fundamental to operational effectiveness. For this reason the Armed Forces have age-related policies that require personnel to leave after a certain number of years to ensure that there is a constant movement through the “promotion pyramid”, otherwise career advancement would become static.

This would be unacceptable as, compared to civilians, Service personnel are unable to move as freely in and out of the labour market. Maintaining the balance of age and experience is fundamental to operational capability, and the terms of employment for Service personnel are structured accordingly. This system, which needs to operate without legal interference, is clear, policy driven and has been accepted by Her Majesty’s Treasury/Cabinet Office as lying at the heart of the Armed Forces’ workforce strategy.

MitchT

Original Poster:

17,089 posts

233 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
Age discrimination is alive and well in the private sector, they're just not as open about it.
In the private sector they just ignore your application... or tell you you're overqualified... if you're lucky enough to get a response at all!


TonyRPH said:
Wait until you try changing jobs in your late 50's...

Your CV will be greeted with much enthusiasm and a telephone interview (with good feedback) will follow.

That then results in a face to face interview, which subsequently just falls flat...
You actually managed to get an interview! That's one up on me!!

DuraAce

4,272 posts

184 months

Saturday 21st July 2018
quotequote all
MitchT said:
At 43 I'm pondering a change of direction. Looks like plenty of interesting things to do in the RAF
It is a great job but you wouldn't enjoy joining at 43 (even if they'd let you) IMHO.
You'd be a lowly recruit with the majority of your colleagues aged under 23 - it's a different world... Many of my juniors are under 20 and I've no idea what they are talking about half the time!
Could you really handle being told to sweep the floor, empty the bins or re-polish your shoes (for example) by an NCO who is 20+ years your junior?!

98elise

31,466 posts

185 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
DuraAce said:
MitchT said:
At 43 I'm pondering a change of direction. Looks like plenty of interesting things to do in the RAF
It is a great job but you wouldn't enjoy joining at 43 (even if they'd let you) IMHO.
You'd be a lowly recruit with the majority of your colleagues aged under 23 - it's a different world... Many of my juniors are under 20 and I've no idea what they are talking about half the time!
Could you really handle being told to sweep the floor, empty the bins or re-polish your shoes (for example) by an NCO who is 20+ years your junior?!
That's a good point. Being in the armed forces is not just a job. The military side means that you will be treated like a child for quite a while. You will be told when to get up, when to shower (and sometimes how!!!), when to go to bed etc. Someone will check your shoes are polished, your clothes ironed and if you'be shaved properly.

As well as your day job you will be expected to do a whole bunch of other menial tasks.

That's fine if you're fresh out of school. If you're in your 40's you're probably quite capable of getting your st together. Could you take a 25 year old telling you that you're doing it wrong?

ecsrobin

18,523 posts

189 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
Say recruitment takes a year you’re now 44.

Officer training (one of the options you mentioned) takes 9 months with no resits you’re about to turn 45 and you’re residential at cranwell wife and kids? Will be a struggle.

Then to RAF Shawbury for air traffic training which if I remember correctly is close to 2 years training. So you’ll be 47 before you start your first unit. (Family can join you at Shawbury on the married patch if you have one) it is not an easy course and I know a few people who have failed some elements or all and one who is currently trying to get off the course.

You then move to your first unit which is wherever they want to send you. They ask for 3 preferences you want to go to and 3 you don’t. For most of my course they ended up with one from the don’t section and I think 2 of us got our first choice.

Do 3 years and move again at the age of 50 when most are thinking of retiring from the service.

And as above on your training most of the socialising happens whilst out nightclubbing staying as a group at weekends and so on if you don’t I can imagine it being a very lonely course.

JoeBolt

284 posts

186 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
I joined the RAF in the early 1980's at the tender age of just turned 17.

I remember in my RAF Swinderby recruit training flight, there were two oldies. A 28 year old and a 36 year old, who we called grandad and great grandad respectively. The latter was rejoining the RAF. He'd already done a few years service in the 1960's / early 70's. I guess the RAF must have been desperate for stewards in those days!

For my course of training, Aircraft Engineering Apprentice, the permitted age on entry was 16 to 18.5 years. The majority of recruits of all trades appeared to be under 18. The over 18's were issued with a green epaulette slide, thus enabling the wearer to purchase booze in the NAAFI bar. These valuable items of uniform were quite thin on the ground and therefore highly prized and barterable. Just don't get caught!

The armed forces expect personnel to fully embrace the ethos. Recruit training is designed to break you down and then build you back up as the service sees fit. I'm not sure how successful this would be with a middle-aged recruit.

How would the OP feel when the Drill Corporal / PTI / Regiment NCO screams insults and obscenities in his face over the tiniest transgression. Does this still happen? I certainly hope so!

Edited by JoeBolt on Monday 23 July 05:51

jonah35

3,940 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Amazing isn’t it!

The government can discriminate on age but private businesses can’t

DuraAce

4,272 posts

184 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
jonah35 said:
Amazing isn’t it!

The government can discriminate on age but private businesses can’t
You dont think some of the reasons provided above outline why it's required in this case?

You think a 43 years old recruit living and working with teenagers is a good thing?

MitchT

Original Poster:

17,089 posts

233 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Some interesting insight there and an education - all sorts of factors I hadn't considered. Back to the drawing board, perhaps.

DuraAce said:
You think a 43 years old recruit living and working with teenagers is a good thing?
I was late 30s going on 40 working with graduates and that was great. Young, optimistic, vibrant, energetic people who made me feel like I'd been given a new lease of life. Far better than working with my peers who just want to spend all day talking about their kids and what's happening on the soaps.

98elise

31,466 posts

185 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
DuraAce said:
jonah35 said:
Amazing isn’t it!

The government can discriminate on age but private businesses can’t
You dont think some of the reasons provided above outline why it's required in this case?

You think a 43 years old recruit living and working with teenagers is a good thing?
It's only a restriction on joining. Once in there are all age ranges living and working together.

dai1983

3,160 posts

173 months

Evanivitch

25,920 posts

146 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
MitchT said:
At 43 I'm pondering a change of direction. Looks like plenty of interesting things to do in the RAF and training provided too. However, looking at some roles that I could be interested in, it's quickly obvious that I'm on a hiding to nothing.

Applicants must be ...

Cyberspace Communication Specialist - 16 – 35 years old

Driver - 17 – 29 years old

Air Operations (Control) Officer - 17.5 – 40 (Must attest before 41st birthday)

Etc.

I thought this kind of thing was illegal these days.
Join the Reserve, usually far more relaxed.

Take every opportunity to do training/exercise and after a few years you might be able to join regulars/full time reservist. Or you might not.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/army-re...