Job Interview - Suit or not to suit?
Discussion
Somewhat of a contentious topic now.
There'll be some people along in a moment to tell you that a suit is old fashioned and will show (in certain environments) that you don't fit in.
When this topic was last discussed, someone suggested that a 3/4 zip up top with chinos was more suitable.
I'm in the camp that says I can't think of anyone who has been turned down for a role for being over-dressed. I have encountered people who have been turned down for being under-dressed.
So, suit or jacket and trousers.
Tie? This does depend on your vertical. When I last interviewed a couple of years back, I didn't wear a tie and it was fine.
However, if you are a lawyer interviewing in London for example, absolutely wear a tie
There'll be some people along in a moment to tell you that a suit is old fashioned and will show (in certain environments) that you don't fit in.
When this topic was last discussed, someone suggested that a 3/4 zip up top with chinos was more suitable.
I'm in the camp that says I can't think of anyone who has been turned down for a role for being over-dressed. I have encountered people who have been turned down for being under-dressed.
So, suit or jacket and trousers.
Tie? This does depend on your vertical. When I last interviewed a couple of years back, I didn't wear a tie and it was fine.
However, if you are a lawyer interviewing in London for example, absolutely wear a tie
Countdown said:
For me it's a suit but no tie.
You told us that you were appointed to a board position of an international company, after being interviewed in shorts. This was after an inspirational post you'd written on Linkedin, if I recall correctly.Have you changed your mind, or do you have a jacket that matches your shorts?
Zio Di Roma said:
You told us that you were appointed to a board position of an international company, after being interviewed in shorts. This was after an inspirational post you'd written on Linkedin, if I recall correctly.
Have you changed your mind, or do you have a jacket that matches your shorts?
I may have been mocking the PH Powerfully Built Director stereotype where "PHers interview Companies rather than the other way round, where interviews happen informally at 5-star restaurants usually somewhere in Europe or the US, and where, if the Company doesn't like their unique and imitable PH Director style, they can shove their 6-figure paying job up their arses" Have you changed your mind, or do you have a jacket that matches your shorts?

Countdown said:
Zio Di Roma said:
You told us that you were appointed to a board position of an international company, after being interviewed in shorts. This was after an inspirational post you'd written on Linkedin, if I recall correctly.
Have you changed your mind, or do you have a jacket that matches your shorts?
I may have been mocking the PH Powerfully Built Director stereotype where "PHers interview Companies rather than the other way round, where interviews happen informally at 5-star restaurants usually somewhere in Europe or the US, and where, if the Company doesn't like their unique and imitable PH Director style, they can shove their 6-figure paying job up their arses" Have you changed your mind, or do you have a jacket that matches your shorts?

the-norseman said:
For me a suit is standard attire for an interview, tie optional depending on the role.
But there is roles that I wouldn't go suited for, years ago when I was 17-18 I went for a labourer at a reclaimers yard in a suit, stood out like a sore thumb.
This. Dress to what would be considered smart for the particular job. But there is roles that I wouldn't go suited for, years ago when I was 17-18 I went for a labourer at a reclaimers yard in a suit, stood out like a sore thumb.
A suit an tie for any normal office based role, exceptions would be things like the creative industries where they tend not to wear suits. As you say a for labouring job a suit out of place, not smart.
You want to look smart/presentable for that particular role, but not get the dress code entirely wrong.
Muzzer79 said:
Somewhat of a contentious topic now.
There'll be some people along in a moment to tell you that a suit is old fashioned and will show (in certain environments) that you don't fit in.
When this topic was last discussed, someone suggested that a 3/4 zip up top with chinos was more suitable.
I'm in the camp that says I can't think of anyone who has been turned down for a role for being over-dressed. I have encountered people who have been turned down for being under-dressed.
So, suit or jacket and trousers.
Tie? This does depend on your vertical. When I last interviewed a couple of years back, I didn't wear a tie and it was fine.
However, if you are a lawyer interviewing in London for example, absolutely wear a tie
I once turned someone down for his bow tie and marron corduroy suit - among other things, but it was the suit that pushed him into the weeds.There'll be some people along in a moment to tell you that a suit is old fashioned and will show (in certain environments) that you don't fit in.
When this topic was last discussed, someone suggested that a 3/4 zip up top with chinos was more suitable.
I'm in the camp that says I can't think of anyone who has been turned down for a role for being over-dressed. I have encountered people who have been turned down for being under-dressed.
So, suit or jacket and trousers.
Tie? This does depend on your vertical. When I last interviewed a couple of years back, I didn't wear a tie and it was fine.
However, if you are a lawyer interviewing in London for example, absolutely wear a tie
Gassing Station | Jobs & Employment Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff