F10 M5 more power than quoted?
F10 M5 more power than quoted?
Author
Discussion

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Ive been watching the grape vine and it seems that things are not all they seem with the new F10. On top of the rhumour mill saying that the new engine is in fact good for 600bhp as standard the cooler weather might be aiding the engine in producing way more than that. Some say that standard cars doing dyno runs are showing over 613bhp in the US mid states which could mean more in the cooler north. A few calculations by a yank owner, verified by a couple of geek moments show that correction down to 40f will give around 620bhp. The same was going on with my RS6 when comparing summer and winter runs.

On top of that the timed performance figures are supporting this theory. If the F10 actually had the booked 560bhp the older E60 could catch the new car out above 100mph, which would be embarrasing for BMW. The proof is in that the F10 is quicker in all scenarios. 1/4 mile times, 0-100, 0-60, 30-70 etc and associated geeky calculations would suggest from stock you are looking at over 600bhp.

Thats going to put the wind up Audi! Its just a shame that the new F10 motor wont be as tunable without new turbos. Audi V10TT inc a MRC map, Filters and Miltek = 780bhp+

Eddie

Schermerhorn

4,352 posts

215 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
It's certainly possible. I remember people saying that the R35 GT-R was running closer to 550bhp rather than the stated 478bhp that Nissan were officially quoting.

If it is true, looks like we're going to have another BHP war again between BMW, Mercedes and Audi.

Moobs

279 posts

210 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
On Forza 4. The F10 is stated as 590bhp - compared to the official line of 560bhp. So much like the Nissan GTR their figures may be understated.

roofer

5,136 posts

237 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how early can you get on the power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how earlty can you get on the
power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
That wasnt my point. Just interested to see its true colours.

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how earlty can you get on the
power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
That wasnt my point. Just interested to see its true colours.

Chipper

1,540 posts

243 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how early can you get on the power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
Tbh it was the fastest car I had ever driven by far and my gut feeling is my previous porsche GTS and GT3's would of been left behind in its wake. It was so fast that in the 24 hours I had it i had lost the back end three times in a straight line just using the full power!

After 24 hours I came away thinking that if I bought one I would either lose my license or something worse.

I felt it had quite a bit more than 560 bhp...

roofer

5,136 posts

237 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Chipper said:
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how early can you get on the power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
Tbh it was the fastest car I had ever driven by far and my gut feeling is my previous porsche GTS and GT3's would of been left behind in its wake. It was so fast that in the 24 hours I had it i had lost the back end three times in a straight line just using the full power!

After 24 hours I came away thinking that if I bought one I would either lose my license or something worse.

I felt it had quite a bit more than 560 bhp...
I don't dispute its a fast car, but the GT3 had more of a conversation with you? Its a lump of tin, and physics cannot be denied? But i've yet to find a steering wheel with the information of a Porsche (Mk 1 Lotus Cortina excepted, but i did say i was old) smile

smokey145

616 posts

176 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
roofer said:
Chipper said:
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how early can you get on the power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
Tbh it was the fastest car I had ever driven by far and my gut feeling is my previous porsche GTS and GT3's would of been left behind in its wake. It was so fast that in the 24 hours I had it i had lost the back end three times in a straight line just using the full power!

After 24 hours I came away thinking that if I bought one I would either lose my license or something worse.

I felt it had quite a bit more than 560 bhp...
I don't dispute its a fast car, but the GT3 had more of a conversation with you? Its a lump of tin, and physics cannot be denied? But i've yet to find a steering wheel with the information of a Porsche (Mk 1 Lotus Cortina excepted, but i did say i was old) smile
have you driven an E60 M5/E63 M6? how did the power compare?

this is very interesting eddie, good post.

andygtt

8,345 posts

290 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
roofer said:
Chipper said:
roofer said:
I do get confused with all these numbers, but humour me, i'm old. Numbers may mean loads in the pub pissing contest, but of more importance is surely;

How does it drive?
How can it transmit the power it has?
Do i have the ability to use what it has?

A car going at x speed in a straight line means the square root of fekkal...doesn't it?

How much speed can it carry through a turn and how early can you get on the power, balancing it with just 1 foot and 2 hands...thats what makes a car, does it not?

Many will buy an M5, few will know how to use it.
Tbh it was the fastest car I had ever driven by far and my gut feeling is my previous porsche GTS and GT3's would of been left behind in its wake. It was so fast that in the 24 hours I had it i had lost the back end three times in a straight line just using the full power!

After 24 hours I came away thinking that if I bought one I would either lose my license or something worse.

I felt it had quite a bit more than 560 bhp...
I don't dispute its a fast car, but the GT3 had more of a conversation with you? Its a lump of tin, and physics cannot be denied? But i've yet to find a steering wheel with the information of a Porsche (Mk 1 Lotus Cortina excepted, but i did say i was old) smile
quite a few cars that have more communication than porsche if you look hard enough... gotta say though that I don't care how much power the M5 has, it wont lap a circuit as quick as a GT3 IMO.

whilst I dont doubt its running more than the quoted 560bhp, I suspect the big difference being felt here is the massive torque advantage against the E60 M5 or a GT3 and the fact that the engine doesn't rev as hard as either so a completely different type of engine?
Have they moved the new M5 into more of an AMG type of car?

Gotta love turbos, what the hell would the E60 feel like with a pair smile

Edited by andygtt on Tuesday 3rd January 09:28

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
andygtt said:
quite a few cars that have more communication than porsche if you look hard enough... gotta say though that I don't care how much power the M5 has, it wont lap a circuit as quick as a GT3 IMO.

Uwhilst I dont doubt its running more than the quoted 560bhp, I suspect the big difference being felt here is the massive torque advantage against the E60 M5 or a GT3 and the fact that the engine doesn't rev as hard as either so a completely different type of engine?
Have they moved the new M5 into more of an AMG type of car?

Gotta love turbos, what the hell would the E60 feel like with a pair smile

Edited by andygtt on Tuesday 3rd January 09:28
Most likely like an RS6.

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
smokey145 said:
have you driven an E60 M5/E63 M6? how did the power compare?

this is very interesting eddie, good post.
M5 vs M6? Can't say anyone would see a difference seeing as its the same engine shared in a very similar body weight.

Eddie

dele

1,270 posts

220 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
My N55 engined 335i should make about 300bhp standard but it made 322bhp on a standard dyno run, so id say BMW are conservative

jon-

16,534 posts

242 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
ecain63 said:
smokey145 said:
have you driven an E60 M5/E63 M6? how did the power compare?

this is very interesting eddie, good post.
M5 vs M6? Can't say anyone would see a difference seeing as its the same engine shared in a very similar body weight.

Eddie
I read this as how did the f10 power delivery compare to the e60/e63.

Even if I'm wrong, it's a question I'm interested in knowing the answer to smile

David 997t

344 posts

212 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
With regards to the F10 M5 and the E60 M5 they are different cars totally imo. The new just pulls in any gear and any speed, the old one needed to be revved hard!! The new one in my view does also liked to be revved but theres not a massive need for it!
In regards to comparing it to a RS6 I personally think thats wide of the mark the F10 is a far better car!

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
David 997t said:
With regards to the F10 M5 and the E60 M5 they are different cars totally imo. The new just pulls in any gear and any speed, the old one needed to be revved hard!! The new one in my view does also liked to be revved but theres not a massive need for it!
In regards to comparing it to a RS6 I personally think thats wide of the mark the F10 is a far better car!
agreed, the F10 is a far better car. I only answered RS6 with regard to what the V10 E60 would be like with 2 turbos in terms of power.

As for the E60 vs F10 experience. You cannot compare really. One is a pure performance machine, the other a performance focussed wafter.


ecain63

Original Poster:

10,647 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
David 997t said:
With regards to the F10 M5 and the E60 M5 they are different cars totally imo. The new just pulls in any gear and any speed, the old one needed to be revved hard!! The new one in my view does also liked to be revved but theres not a massive need for it!
In regards to comparing it to a RS6 I personally think thats wide of the mark the F10 is a far better car!
agreed, the F10 is a far better car. I only answered RS6 with regard to what the V10 E60 would be like with 2 turbos in terms of power.

As for the E60 vs F10 experience. You cannot compare really. One is a pure performance machine, the other a performance focussed wafter.


Cheburator mk2

3,203 posts

225 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
ecain63 said:
As for the E60 vs F10 experience. You cannot compare really. One is a pure performance machine, the other a performance focussed wafter.
That was my impression as well...

David 997t

344 posts

212 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
ecain63 said:
agreed, the F10 is a far better car. I only answered RS6 with regard to what the V10 E60 would be like with 2 turbos in terms of power.

As for the E60 vs F10 experience. You cannot compare really. One is a pure performance machine, the other a performance focussed wafter.
Not sure if I totally agree to be honest! The F10 feels more of a wafter because of the torque levels, when you start to grab it by the scruff of the neck and give it maximum rev's it comes alive like the E60 does. The only difference being the higher rev's of the V10.
I have had the car just under a month now and the more I drive it the more I love it much the same as when I had my V10!!
Neither car is pure performance machine they are BOTH 4 door saloons that can push a 100k + car down the road with the kids in the back!! JMO

sinizter

3,348 posts

212 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2012
quotequote all
I've heard similar about 335i cars having more power than stated.

This must be how they make cars that drive well and yet have consistently lower emissions - the ECU remaps over time perhaps ?