New Rubber
New Rubber
Author
Discussion

Bmeerm3

Original Poster:

37 posts

197 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Hi.

I have a 2004 M3 and the time has come for four new tyres.

I've been quoted £890 for Contisport contact M3 and a controversial £430 for Accelera! Prices include fitting on 19 rims.

Less than half price... ? Bargain? I'm not sure!

Thoughts please!??

ian in lancs

3,847 posts

224 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Conti's - right balance between cost and performance.

Bmeerm3

Original Poster:

37 posts

197 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Have you any experience of the cheaper??

Nedzilla

2,439 posts

200 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
When ever ive heard them mentioned in the past the usual 'ditch finder' term crops up.To be honest at that price for an M3 they cant be up to much can they.If you want to try something a bit cheaper try the vredestein ultrac sessanta or the falken 452.Theyve been around a bit now but are both popular with M3 owners and are around the £700 mark fitted.
Ive recently fitted the vreds to my vert and am very pleased with them.Prefer them to the PS 2's i had before.

ian in lancs

3,847 posts

224 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
No! I prefer to stay on the road!

I've always read the tyre tests in evo and the like. The top tyres tend to be Michelin, Pirelli, Goodyear and continental. Contis are only tyres BMW have homoglated on the car. Michelin ps2's are usually what the boards recommend but iirc aren't made in the size fitted to the car. Slight size change sorts it though.

MattOz

4,019 posts

290 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
I've got the Conti 5P's on my M3CS and they're better than the CSC3 and also, in my experience, the Pilot Sport 2. I once had some Kumho Ku31's on a set of BBS CH's and they were poor in comparison to either the Conti or the Michelin. This was despite them being lauded as a good budget tyre.

My Conti 5P's were £900 fitted and are excellent. That's in CSL sizes, so 235/40/19 and 265/35/19.

The Ferret

1,287 posts

186 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Vredestein Ultracs all the way mate. On my 2nd set now after originally going with Conti's. They are as good as the Conti's in the dry, and the wet weather performance is actually better.

With the price difference between the 2 there is no way I'll be looking at anything else. Check out www.m3cutters.co.uk for more info, they seem to be the preferred option, apart from the real expensive stuff.

Conti's may be the only one to carry the M3 markings, but in reality a lot of that comes down to marketing and how much they are willing to pay to have their tyre as the OEM choice.

mr sagman

1,735 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
Another massive vote for the Ultrac Vredestein.. I have them on my M5 and My Tuscan S, I will no longer use anything else, in my opinion they are absolutely superb in the dry and simply incredible in the wet.

ga41

148 posts

223 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
I also had Ultrac Sessanta's on my car and was very happy with them. Sometimes cheaper does not necessarily mean worse but in the case of tires i wouldn't take that chance, they are literally the only thing connecting you to the road... The Vreds are a good tire in a good price. You can get much better performing tires but they offer great value for money.

Edited by ga41 on Thursday 12th January 06:05

Jonboy_t

5,038 posts

209 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
I've just (few weeks back) put Falken 452's on all round and they are great! The car doesn't get used enough and the old tyres were too nackered for too long for me to say they've got more grip in the wet/dry, but I've certainly noticed subtle handling improvements.

I'm no longer being pulled into truck tracks on the motorway for one!!

Boogsie

124 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
Where did you get the Ultracs? My rear tires are going to be due for replacement soon and I'd like to try them, but I can't find them online.

Nedzilla

2,439 posts

200 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
Boogsie said:
Where did you get the Ultracs? My rear tires are going to be due for replacement soon and I'd like to try them, but I can't find them online.
http://www.camskill.co.uk/

Got mine frome here about 4 months ago. £627 for 4 IIRC

Boogsie

124 posts

177 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
No one seems to do 285/35 ZR19s frown Not even camskill.
I'll have to start <gasp> phoning people!

The Ferret

1,287 posts

186 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Boogsie said:
No one seems to do 285/35 ZR19s frown Not even camskill.
I'll have to start <gasp> phoning people!
What rims are you fitting them on, out of interest?


Pig Skill

1,368 posts

229 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Boogsie said:
No one seems to do 285/35 ZR19s frown Not even camskill.
I'll have to start <gasp> phoning people!
285's?

Kinell bet it looks like a drag racer biggrin

Boogsie

124 posts

177 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Standard E60 M5...
Looks fine to me smile

Boogsie

124 posts

177 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Although the OP was about an M3... See how that could look now.

The Ferret

1,287 posts

186 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Boogsie said:
Although the OP was about an M3... See how that could look now.
yeah sorry mate I had assumed you were maybe running some seriously upsized tyres on an M3, in which case dropping back to the correct size (or even the next upsize) would mean you could get the vreds.

Suprised they are not available in your size though. You can get them in the correct size for OEM 19 and for CSL wheels.

Sir_Dave

1,506 posts

236 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I've got Kumho KU31's and personally cant fault them, certainly no worse than the Conti's that i had on my 330, or the Pilot Sports that i had on the TT.

And for £125 a corner. Bargain.

Al 450

1,390 posts

247 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I've seen a lot of people recommend the Kumho KU31 (which is now replaced by the KU39 I believe) but it scored really poorly in this month's Evo tyre test. The Vredestein didn't do too well either however the Hankook came second overall. Anyone tried these?