Short feedback on M3 test today.
Short feedback on M3 test today.
Author
Discussion

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Felt a bit sedate compared to my C63 (admittedly mine is mapped circa 530bhp) but i reckon a good 10k miles would unleash something more exciting.

Had my vbox in the car and we confirmed a 4.4s to 60mph. I'll look at the graphs later and see what 30 - 60 and 60 - 100 times are.

The car felt very planted and a really nice place to be but got the feeling that the TC was rather overprotective vs the Sports Handling Mode in my merc.

Overall a good car but probably better / more of a rival to the competition (new C63 due soon) when a slightly fruitier version rolls out.

nickfrog

24,781 posts

243 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Cheers. But how does it drive ? Handling, ride, balance. And what does the vbox say about lateral Gs ?

nick1275

1,272 posts

196 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Having gone out with Eddie today and also driven it, I thought the steering and brakes had exellent feel, ride was firm but didn't seem too back breaking (would need a longer drive to fully comment) but I concur with Eddie it just seemed to need a bit more poke. The sales rep said it would be a totally different car after it's running in service, can anyone shed any light on this?
Drove it in auto for a bit around town, it just seemed to hold on to the gears a bit too long for my liking, maybe it's something to do with the set up it was in.

Overall it got the thumbs up from me

hajaba123

1,336 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Did you manage to run those figures with the sales guy in the car or did they let you out on your own?

nick1275

1,272 posts

196 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
hajaba123 said:
Did you manage to run those figures with the sales guy in the car or did they let you out on your own?
The sales guy had a dodgy back so we had a product genius with us. His attitude was it's your licence, and don't kill it!

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
We didn't really do much on the cornering ability etc. It was only a test drive and not a product scrutiny session. Still out so not had chance to look at the acceleration graphics.

Sales guy was a young lad who was into track days so didn't mind a bit of a hoon.

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all

I was more interested in the paddles and driver feel. Having had an E61 M5 before the AMG I was hoping to get the positive gear shifts that I felt with the SMG3. The dct box will never be the same as the old automated manual but it wasn't bad at all. Shifted when you needed it too which is an advancement on the merc and audi competition.

One thing in favour of the new M3 is the potential for tuning. I reckon a map and exhaust will really open it up where it needs it.

Palmball

1,294 posts

200 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Since the running in service and the subsequent ability to open it up, I've found our M3 a touch frustrating - as suggested above, the traction control is much too restrictive (more so than almost any other car I've driven). It'll hold power back for very long constant periods, even when going in a straight line on a hot day. Makes no sense as it makes the car feel slow - I've driven much more powerful cars which are not this restrictive.

MDM mode is better, but in the dry this is similar to what other cars are with traction fully on. However, this is almost my default mode now, just to ensure I can make progress!

The car is opening up more with more miles (more so than other new cars I've had) but mileage and the running in service are hardly going to turn it into an animal if your thinking it's underpowered now!

gaz1234

5,233 posts

245 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Bournemouth or Southampton?

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Right, I'm back.

The car:

Black on black.

Looks: I quite liked it. I reckon i'd like it more in red with black wheels and carbon exterior parts. Very much a bigger 1M in my eyes with the split front and rear intakes.

Setup: When in M2 mode the Car was in MDM. I did see that on the dash and i had the steering in comfort as i felt the sport setting was a bit heavy. Suspension was in sport. I drove it in paddle mode right from the off and it felt pretty intuitive, much like the SMGIII of my M5 but not as pleasantly mechanical.

On start up there was no obvious exhaust note but a quick press of the M2 button and the sound was very obvious, especially if sat in the back.

The drive: 1st gear in my opinion when pulling away is a bit too short. 2nd gear is more than adequate. It's very easy to find the power band with this engine. It's not obviously laggy like the A45 but it doesnt pin you into your seat from the first press of the throttle. Onto the highway and the car feels firm yet pointy at motorway speeds. Overtaking is effortless when in the right gear (i'd imagine just as easy in auto) and it's quick to shift up and down where needed.

The first test was a 0-60. Admittedly we had to do it on a slight downhill on an onlslip but we did do one. Pulling away in 1st (with only a moderate throttle) and the TC light was on instantly. Could i feel the rear losing grip? No! Shortshift to 2nd and we start to make progress, just. TC light was still on but no rear slip that i could feel. By the time 2nd gear is used up we are at 60 (i think! can't remember if i went into 3rd). 4.4s on the vbox but it didnt feel that quick. Nowhere near as quick as my AMG anyway!

Following that I did a few quick roundabout exits and the TC light was still there, overpowering any hope of fun on the go. It didn't really fill me with much excitement!

The rest of the drive i left to Nick who used more of it's upper range whilst in auto mode. His best 60-100 according to the data on the lap was 6.1s. That's quite slow! Nick, was that full throttle? Certainly felt like it when i was in the back. That would make it a 10.5 0-100 which is not that quick. My AMG has done it in under 8.8s. At speed it did seem planted and the steering was apparently pretty sound for what we commanded of it.

Sound under load: Very much a turbocharged unit! It's quite a nice sound when sat in the back but i dont think i'll be buying into one just yet. V8's have it whipped for aural pleasure im afraid! There was no obvious downshift blipping and little or no over-run crackle. All sounds i'd like to hear from an M-car.

Racelogic have just updated their software so this is the best i can do for now with regards to data...... until ive worked out how to use the new system. Shows the 2 best times from today's run. 0-60 in 4.4s and 60-100 in 6.1s.




Edited to add that the brakes are really good. Much better than the AMG Composite Brake Package that my car has, not that it's lacking either. Very solid and positiove brake feel from the //M.

Eddie

Edited by ecain63 on Monday 14th July 19:49

cerb4.5lee

42,607 posts

206 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Palmball said:
I've found our M3 a touch frustrating - as suggested above, the traction control is much too restrictive (more so than almost any other car I've driven). It'll hold power back for very long constant periods, even when going in a straight line on a hot day. Makes no sense as it makes the car feel slow - I've driven much more powerful cars which are not this restrictive.
In the dry I always had the traction control off on both my E92 M3/Z4M for exactly the same reason as it was just too restrictive and compared to the new M3 they both have very little torque and not as much BHP either but surely a powerful RWD car should be about fun at the end of the day.

bennyboysvuk

3,494 posts

274 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Palmball said:
Since the running in service and the subsequent ability to open it up, I've found our M3 a touch frustrating - as suggested above, the traction control is much too restrictive (more so than almost any other car I've driven). It'll hold power back for very long constant periods, even when going in a straight line on a hot day. Makes no sense as it makes the car feel slow - I've driven much more powerful cars which are not this restrictive.
Are we getting to the point now where BMW are electronically dumbing down its cars too much? On the one hand, these things are tremendously easy to slide about in and great fun for those who partake in that. On the other hand, are BMW slightly wary of selling a 430hp car and they know that if they don't restrain it a lot, people will wrap it around trees?

EricE

1,945 posts

155 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
I don't think I‘ve read a single feedback-post or car review of the new M3 that didn’t criticize the engine in some way or the other. It’s a bit sad when you look back at the history of M engines. I also have to say that the BMW i8 with its hybrid and turbo charged 3 cylinder felt like a much more emotional drive than the M4 when I test drove both. silly

Looking at the way fuel economy developed in the last 7 years it is totally understandable that BMW had to compromise to not make the car completely obsolete towards the end of its lifecycle but I think they may have gone a bit too far.

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
I don't think the engine is the problem with this new M3. If bmw were to take away some of the cotton wool from the driving experience then the car might cut it with the critics.

Patrick Bateman

13,037 posts

200 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
No way would this take 10.5 seconds to get to 100mph if launched properly, even the e92 can beat 10 seconds.

nick1275

1,272 posts

196 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
I came off a roundabout yesterday in 3rd and buried the thottle and instantly the Tc kicked in and held it back loads, couldn't understand why seeing as it was a nice warm day. I would personally like another go with it all switched off

ecain63

Original Poster:

10,646 posts

201 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
No way would this take 10.5 seconds to get to 100mph if launched properly, even the e92 can beat 10 seconds.
My thoughts too.

We have been invited back to test it more thoroughly once it's been run for a couple more weeks.

ChrisMCoupe

927 posts

238 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
I was told on my M4 test drive that BMW weren't insured to let me turn TC off. For me it completely ruined the test drive as it was extremely intrusive. The sales guy knows me well and knows i've owned my M6 4 years and still wouldn't budge on letting me turn the bugger off smile

original guvnor

128 posts

175 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Autocar have recorded 8.8 to 100 two-up with a full tank of fuel in the M4.

forest172

755 posts

232 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
might be an idea to remove dealer. As the poor guy could probably lose his job for letting you v-car upto 100mph if somebody above reads this