M135i auto vs M135i manual
Discussion
8 speed auto by ZF. Fantastic box. Got it in the M135i and RR Sport. I prefer it to the DSG I had in the RS3 as well. Smoother and just as fast on the shifts.
If you sit in traffic a lot then get the auto. If you have a wife that refuses to drive manual then get an auto. If you want driver involvement get the manual.
If you sit in traffic a lot then get the auto. If you have a wife that refuses to drive manual then get an auto. If you want driver involvement get the manual.
The ZF auto is one the best auto's out there.
I personally find the auto better in the M135i because:
It's quicker 0-60 because of the smaller ratios, and the speed of gear changes.
MPG difference for man vs auto nowadays is so small.
Feels smoother and more comfortable to the 6 speeds DSG's I'm used to. The more gears defiantly help.
I personally find the auto better in the M135i because:
- Manual peddles are offset
- Launch control
- It's a long clutch, and being only 5"8 I have to sit closer than I would like to probably engage it
- 99% it's more enjoyable because it's an auto. Occasionally around country lanes I miss changing gear, but still fun and can always use paddles if needs be.
- Cheaper to tax as it's got less Co2 emissions (huge £60 saving a year!)
- I don't have to worry about the OH burning out the clutch
It's quicker 0-60 because of the smaller ratios, and the speed of gear changes.
MPG difference for man vs auto nowadays is so small.
Feels smoother and more comfortable to the 6 speeds DSG's I'm used to. The more gears defiantly help.
I love my manual but quite excited to be chopping it in for a higher specced auto. I borrowed an M235i with the auto box and fell in love with it but sadly cant justify the extra cost to go into a 2er and have got another 1er on the way. Really dont think you can loose either way. Both brilliant boxes but the auto certainly feels faster with the shorter ratios.
corvettedave said:
thanks guys for info, was looking at a bmw pdf tech sheet
the 0-1000 km/h is 23.9 manual, 23.8 auto, so even with manual having to do some changes, only a fraction behind
4th/5th gear 80 - 120 km/h - 4.3 manual and 5.0 on auto ??? so whats going on here?
Its a funny one obviously due to ratios again. My friend has the auto and we both booted it on a dual carriage way, I kept in 2nd gear all the way to the speed limit and was right up his chuff when i was expecting him to have pulled away. Its a tough choice because both gearboxes are great. the 0-1000 km/h is 23.9 manual, 23.8 auto, so even with manual having to do some changes, only a fraction behind
4th/5th gear 80 - 120 km/h - 4.3 manual and 5.0 on auto ??? so whats going on here?
jon- said:
nick30 said:
SFO said:
how badly offset are they?
I dont agree. Try one but in my opinion the pedals are perfectly placed. Have read this before but dont understand it myself. I've gone for the manual option too. Having driven an auto for the past 10 months, I can't wait to return to a manual 'box. My reasons for choosing the manual are both driving and practicality based.
- More control.
- More interactive.
- Can put it in neutral and roll it without the ignition turned on.
I tried an auto M135i and although it's a very impressive auto, it still lacked all the options that a clutch provides (mostly when you want the tail of the car to behave in a certain way).
- More control.
- More interactive.
- Can put it in neutral and roll it without the ignition turned on.
I tried an auto M135i and although it's a very impressive auto, it still lacked all the options that a clutch provides (mostly when you want the tail of the car to behave in a certain way).
Gassing Station | M Power | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


