M5 CSL - errr me want.!!
M5 CSL - errr me want.!!
Author
Discussion

Not Ideal

Original Poster:

3,057 posts

218 months

NicoG

661 posts

238 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Nice car, but the author, Greg Kable, should be ashamed of the spelling mistakes and the mis-quoted power figure of the standard car. My mum knows they're 507 out the box....

dougc

8,241 posts

295 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
CSL?

1780kg?

rofl

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

244 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
"No plans for production..."

My arse; I'll put money on there being 50 last hurrah specials with an appropriately large price tag.

mmm-five

12,388 posts

314 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Surely they'd savemore than 50kg by ditching the rear seats, steel roof and electric front seats. I could see them losing more like 150kg doing all that, plus they could strip some sound proofing out and remove the heavy amp for the stereo - all you need is air-con and some way to set the eleventy-million engine/gearbox/suspension settings.

And yes, I would love one - let's see how much I can strip from an e60 M5 in Forza 3...

Edited by mmm-five on Wednesday 28th October 14:59

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

244 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
And yes, I would love one - let's see how much I can strip from an e60 M5 in Forza 3...
See you at the Ring wink

CarbonM5

927 posts

221 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
CSL: C=coupe,mabe SSL would be better!

Olf

11,978 posts

248 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
As once said by a famous chinese philosopher... A paint job does not a coupe make.

Zod

35,295 posts

288 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
CarbonM5 said:
CSL: C=coupe,mabe SSL would be better!
SSabL (Saloon, Sport, a bit Lighter)

Stedman

7,472 posts

222 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Sod the performance, i want the paint job!

...and the car to go with it

SoliD

1,538 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th October 2009
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
Surely they'd savemore than 50kg by ditching the rear seats, steel roof and electric front seats. I could see them losing more like 150kg doing all that, plus they could strip some sound proofing out and remove the heavy amp for the stereo - all you need is air-con and some way to set the eleventy-million engine/gearbox/suspension settings.


Edited by mmm-five on Wednesday 28th October 14:59
Exactly what I was thinking, how did they only strip 50kg by doing all that, surely it would be a fair bit more, the point of this negates the M5 as a super saloon though, would anyone buy one as a track only car?

NicoG

661 posts

238 months

Thursday 29th October 2009
quotequote all
SoliD said:
mmm-five said:
Surely they'd savemore than 50kg by ditching the rear seats, steel roof and electric front seats. I could see them losing more like 150kg doing all that, plus they could strip some sound proofing out and remove the heavy amp for the stereo - all you need is air-con and some way to set the eleventy-million engine/gearbox/suspension settings.


Edited by mmm-five on Wednesday 28th October 14:59
Exactly what I was thinking, how did they only strip 50kg by doing all that, surely it would be a fair bit more, the point of this negates the M5 as a super saloon though, would anyone buy one as a track only car?
Possibly not - Think what you could create from an E46 M3 with 'that' budget !!

Perhaps money-no-object die-hard collectors would see the limited run quickly out the doors as Regensburg though....

Neil.D

2,878 posts

236 months

Thursday 29th October 2009
quotequote all
Well its better than that HAMMANN POS.