From STI to M3
From STI to M3
Author
Discussion

scoobyPPP

Original Poster:

243 posts

200 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Hi guys, currently own a 05 plate Sti with 44,000 miles on the clock looking to swtich to an M3. I was wandering if anyone else has made the same switch. Im looking for a manual coupe facelift, hoping for a straight swap but i doubt it will happen, any advice or suggestions would be great, cheers.

Col 666

1,078 posts

237 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
I went from an 06 STI to a Z4M, not exactly an M3 but engine and tranny are the same. The BMW feels a good bit quicker top end but misses out on the midrange urge of the 2.5 turbo in the scoob. Gearbox is pretty horrible between 1st and 2nd, they all are seemingly.
The main difference is the handling, you cant drive the BMW like a Subaru!! I have the DSC off all the time in the dry but dont even think about it in the wet as its bloody lethal! I've had 5 Imprezas in various states of tune and you can drive them like a complete loony and get away with it 99% of the time but not with 340bhp at the rear wheels!
You'll be used to being in petrol stations all the time with the scoob, the BMW will be the same if not worse!

scoobyPPP

Original Poster:

243 posts

200 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
I have always loved the M3 and would like to own one but the Sti is so addictive. I usually get bored of cars after about a year or so but the Sti always gives me a smile. I havnt ever driven an M3 so have always wondered how the experience compares. The sti has brutal accelaration that i have yet to feel in another car.

mcelliott

10,102 posts

205 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Just made a similar conversion myself. Went from a PPP'd bug eyed wagon to a low mileage E46 M3. Without hesitation, I would say go for it. Whilst the Subaru provided me with 10 years absolute trouble free motoring, the BMW is somehow so much more special in terms of build quality, looks and also the fact that it's got two extra cylinders! Plus you've got the wonderful howl of that glorious straight six.

As far as performance is concerned, you may not notice a huge difference owning an STI over the M3, but I found the acceleration from low down and mid range much more linear in the M3.

As far as running costs are concerned, only having owned the car a few weeks it's difficult to say. But as you probably know, Scoobies are not exactly cheap to run!

My Scooby is actually only worth buttons even though it's immaculate (being 2001), and I had to make quite a bit outlay for the M3, which is 2005. But to my way of thinking, it's quite a logical step to go from the Subaru to the M3 - both hugely capable cars but dare I say it, the Beemer is slightly more grown up.

So to summise, having only owned the car for a short period, I am hugely impressed with it's all round capabilities and would definitely recommend you take a close look at an M3.

Hope you find this useful.

goldblum

10,272 posts

191 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
I've done the STi - STi - EVO -M3 thing,to two E46's as it happens.

As previous posters have said,the back end can step out,even on damp roads and with seemingly little justification.

If you enjoy driving fast on challenging roads and in all conditions DO NOT get an M3.The first one I had ,an 03,left me thinking

is that it? so I tried another,with the same result.

This is not a rant about rw drive,btw my next car was a 911 and that felt glued by comparison.

M3's are like expensive watches: look good but actually do little else in the real world.

Sorry not true,they're quite comfy,well built and show an ability to aquaplane that is astonishing.

Your STi just gets on with it,safely and fast.

If an expensive toy is an itch you have to scratch then get a fast Quattro of some denomination.

IMO.

Wills2

28,233 posts

199 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
goldblum said:
I've done the STi - STi - EVO -M3 thing,to two E46's as it happens.


This is not a rant about rw drive,btw my next car was a 911 and that felt glued by comparison.

M3's are like expensive watches: look good but actually do little else in the real world.
Well the 911 would feel glued with the engine slung out over the rear axle, M3's are wonderful I've had the e46 and the e92 (now have gen.2 911 C2S) to say that the M3 doesn't do anything in the real world is nonsense IMVHO and totally misses the point.....The back end stepping out is fun!

Wills2

28,233 posts

199 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
goldblum said:
If an expensive toy is an itch you have to scratch then get a fast Quattro of some denomination.

IMO.
Yawn..................

Edited by Wills2 on Friday 1st October 22:17

Zero7

566 posts

207 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
goldblum said:
I've done the STi - STi - EVO -M3 thing,to two E46's as it happens.

As previous posters have said,the back end can step out,even on damp roads and with seemingly little justification.

If you enjoy driving fast on challenging roads and in all conditions DO NOT get an M3.The first one I had ,an 03,left me thinking

is that it? so I tried another,with the same result.

This is not a rant about rw drive,btw my next car was a 911 and that felt glued by comparison.

M3's are like expensive watches: look good but actually do little else in the real world.

Sorry not true,they're quite comfy,well built and show an ability to aquaplane that is astonishing.

Your STi just gets on with it,safely and fast.

If an expensive toy is an itch you have to scratch then get a fast Quattro of some denomination.

IMO.
What a load of drivel

scoobyPPP

Original Poster:

243 posts

200 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for all the replies guys, still cant make my mind up about this, on one hand i love the look of the M3 but the way the Sti performs may be slower by a touch but just gives me a buzz every time. I owned a mazda RX8 and hated the the linear accelaration, I guess I dont want to end up with something similar.

goldblum

10,272 posts

191 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
Zero7 said:
goldblum said:
I've done the STi - STi - EVO -M3 thing,to two E46's as it happens.

As previous posters have said,the back end can step out,even on damp roads and with seemingly little justification.

If you enjoy driving fast on challenging roads and in all conditions DO NOT get an M3.The first one I had ,an 03,left me thinking

is that it? so I tried another,with the same result.

This is not a rant about rw drive,btw my next car was a 911 and that felt glued by comparison.

M3's are like expensive watches: look good but actually do little else in the real world.

Sorry not true,they're quite comfy,well built and show an ability to aquaplane that is astonishing.

Your STi just gets on with it,safely and fast.

If an expensive toy is an itch you have to scratch then get a fast Quattro of some denomination.

IMO.
What a load of drivel
Clever boy.I'm sure that's just the sort of contribution the OP had in mind when he asked for peoples opinions

on a move 'From STI to M3'.Lol.



DaveR

1,209 posts

308 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
scoobyPPP said:
I owned a mazda RX8 and hated the the linear accelaration, I guess I dont want to end up with something similar.
Then I don't think an M3 is for you my friend.

For me, the most impressive things about the S54 motor are the linearity of its power delivery and the way it just keeps going to past 7,500rpm. If you like the sort of thing (I very much do) then it has few equals. It's pretty much the antithesis of a big mid-range shove when a turbo spools-up though so, if that's your thing, I'm guessing you won't like it.

Zero7

566 posts

207 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
goldblum said:
Zero7 said:
goldblum said:
I've done the STi - STi - EVO -M3 thing,to two E46's as it happens.

As previous posters have said,the back end can step out,even on damp roads and with seemingly little justification.

If you enjoy driving fast on challenging roads and in all conditions DO NOT get an M3.The first one I had ,an 03,left me thinking

is that it? so I tried another,with the same result.

This is not a rant about rw drive,btw my next car was a 911 and that felt glued by comparison.

M3's are like expensive watches: look good but actually do little else in the real world.

Sorry not true,they're quite comfy,well built and show an ability to aquaplane that is astonishing.

Your STi just gets on with it,safely and fast.

If an expensive toy is an itch you have to scratch then get a fast Quattro of some denomination.

IMO.
What a load of drivel
Clever boy.I'm sure that's just the sort of contribution the OP had in mind when he asked for peoples opinions

on a move 'From STI to M3'.Lol.
Perhaps you jut need some driving lessons, $WD can be very easy to drive fast whereas RWD needs to be learned (i've had my fair share of scoobies and EVO's) - Your post was ill informed and effectivly told the guy to get another 4WD... Strange...

goldblum

10,272 posts

191 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
ScoobyPPP -

'any advice or suggestions would be great, cheers.'

Zero7 -

Er.. ok.LoL


Zero7

566 posts

207 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
goldblum said:
ScoobyPPP -

'any advice or suggestions would be great, cheers.'

Zero7 -

Er.. ok.LoL

Better give no advice than misinformed advice, lol...

I've gone from Hawkeye Sti Spec-c to E92 M3 (driven a good fre E46 M3's too including CS and CSL), the power delivery is very different, it will feel slower as the delivery is so much more linear but unlike the scooby which will start running out of puff at around 6.5k the M3 will come into it's won at the top end, bit like a VTEC does.

The handling is just sublime but you can't take liberties, you have to learn to moderate the throttle, I now find 4WD car very boring to drive...

running costs will be higher, tyres are not cheap, servicing is quite expensive but the built quality is on another level to Subaru, plus there are lots of toys, get one with Sat Nav..

torres del paine

1,588 posts

245 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
Zero7 said:
goldblum said:
ScoobyPPP -

'any advice or suggestions would be great, cheers.'

Zero7 -

Er.. ok.LoL

Better give no advice than misinformed advice, lol...

I've gone from Hawkeye Sti Spec-c to E92 M3 (driven a good fre E46 M3's too including CS and CSL), the power delivery is very different, it will feel slower as the delivery is so much more linear but unlike the scooby which will start running out of puff at around 6.5k the M3 will come into it's won at the top end, bit like a VTEC does.

The handling is just sublime but you can't take liberties, you have to learn to moderate the throttle, I now find 4WD car very boring to drive...

running costs will be higher, tyres are not cheap, servicing is quite expensive but the built quality is on another level to Subaru, plus there are lots of toys, get one with Sat Nav..
The engine in the E46 M3 is a real grower, it doesn't have the immediate thump of 4 pot turbo lump but it is fast and more importantly, so much more flexible, satisfying and rewarding; linear, smooth, raspy, lovely fireworks over 5k rpm to the redline, better on motorways at xxx speeds (longer legged and better top end) without inducing a migrane and better for longer jaunts - more GTish when you want it to be.

As for the chassis, it's got tons of grip and feels planted and very balanced at speed - the BMW trademark. It really is a sweet drive and loves fast sweeping roads, hour after hour; front-engined/RWD with peachy in line 6 is a wonderful combination.

The STI from memory has all the usual whiz bang pop thrills of a turbo and is effective but feels more understeery and just not as sweet.


M3 is also miles better looking, BMW really go it right with the E46 M3, particularly CS/CSL.

goldblum

10,272 posts

191 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
torres del paine said:
Zero7 said:
goldblum said:
ScoobyPPP -

'any advice or suggestions would be great, cheers.'

Zero7 -

Er.. ok.LoL

Better give no advice than misinformed advice, lol...

I've gone from Hawkeye Sti Spec-c to E92 M3 (driven a good fre E46 M3's too including CS and CSL), the power delivery is very different, it will feel slower as the delivery is so much more linear but unlike the scooby which will start running out of puff at around 6.5k the M3 will come into it's won at the top end, bit like a VTEC does.

The handling is just sublime but you can't take liberties, you have to learn to moderate the throttle, I now find 4WD car very boring to drive...

running costs will be higher, tyres are not cheap, servicing is quite expensive but the built quality is on another level to Subaru, plus there are lots of toys, get one with Sat Nav..
The engine in the E46 M3 is a real grower, it doesn't have the immediate thump of 4 pot turbo lump but it is fast and more importantly, so much more flexible, satisfying and rewarding; linear, smooth, raspy, lovely fireworks over 5k rpm to the redline, better on motorways at xxx speeds (longer legged and better top end) without inducing a migrane and better for longer jaunts - more GTish when you want it to be.

As for the chassis, it's got tons of grip and feels planted and very balanced at speed - the BMW trademark. It really is a sweet drive and loves fast sweeping roads, hour after hour; front-engined/RWD with peachy in line 6 is a wonderful combination.

The STI from memory has all the usual whiz bang pop thrills of a turbo and is effective but feels more understeery and just not as sweet.


M3 is also miles better looking, BMW really go it right with the E46 M3, particularly CS/CSL.
Agree with this entirely tbh.E46 very good GT car and on the motorway it is very good where the Subabishi's are mundane.

I used to do a regular run from Manchester to Sheffield and deliberately took the long route over the Cat.Fantastic in the M3 but only good in the Japcars.

However that is the only scenario where the M3 is fulfilling.

As mentioned above it has long gearing (longer legged)- too long for town.It doesn't have that much torque,meaning constant gearchanges in traffic/town.

In the wet it is pointless.I'd still take a sorted 4x4 for everday use.Everytime.


Zero 7 -

Just because someone has an opinion you don't agree with doesn't make them ill-informed.

Do try to be civil.




scoobyPPP

Original Poster:

243 posts

200 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
Thanks to all of the replies everyone. I think that if i come across a decent example I may may take the plunge. Currently I only drive the Impreza on weekends and drive a smaller car on weekdays due to work. Running costs are a concern however, how do the facelift models fair with the vanos problems? I did own a 330ci a few years back and used an indy by the name of Barry Deadman, I probably will be using an indy for all repairs and servicing.

reccy with claws

47 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
i recently went from a classic to a e46.and i love it wouldnt go back again.the car feels so much classyer and its rapid.it doesnt seem to drink fuel like the scoob did.when you drive the m3 it feels special.i thought id miss the scoob rumble but the straight six sounds sexy and raspy.
m3 all the way.

k15tox

1,680 posts

205 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
as good as subarus are they carry a image that i dont like, chav. 90% of people that drive them always seem to have a point to prove, wether its off the lights or up your arse on the m1.

give me a m3 anyday, 6pot howl and rwd.

another thing i just cant seem to understand is this whole rwd thing in the wet??

one simple solution do not accelerate hard round bends......its that simple. the only time the rwd will lose out in the wet is corner exit speed. people make out like every rwd car in the wet will kill you......its a joke!

i have 320lbs of tourque at my skinny 245 section rears and i never have a problem in the wet!!!


scoobyPPP

Original Poster:

243 posts

200 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
I think handling wise im not too concerned i dont tend to go crazy around bends, what does concern me is the maintenance costs. What kind of things will I have to look out for on a facelift. I have seen a couple that am interested in:

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2080941.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2068027.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2037602.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/1860725.htm

not to keen on silver but they are at a good price, and not really bothered about sat nav, let me know what you guys think, cheers.