Late NC vs. ND (vs. seagulls)

[Hustle_]

Hi folks. I have been browsing NDs for a while. Have loved the design since it came out, much preferring it to the NC which I discounted offhand because, well, they're oldish now and I know how MX-5s like to return to the earth.

But then a friend commented that NCs have a bit more space for the driver. And then I noticed that you can get a late NC with an electrically folding hard top.

I live three miles from the sea so the threat of seagull poo seems like it could be a drag with a soft top. Also the car will not live in a garage and will be used all year.

Also it might just be some optimistic pricing but NCs don't seem as cheap as they 'should' be which makes me wonder if there are other reasons they are appreciated over the ND.

Not a huge fan of the new RF design although if it's the best for me I will reconsider. It's not about the look, really, but about having a car I will really enjoy driving and which won't end up being a particular nuisance to own.

Also interested in the driving experience NC vs ND. I am across engines and gearboxes, I will just have to drive some, but ride, handling, steering feel...

[Nickp82]

I do think the more generous cabin space and proper (ie fully retractable) electric top are the main contributors to NCs holding their money quite well. I love the look of the ND RF but it just doesn’t deliver the full roof-down experience .