Buying an mx5
Author
Discussion

stormrider2

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Sunday 25th April 2010
quotequote all
I know theres been hundreds of "what mx5?" topics etc, but i've been doing searches around here and can't really find much to help.

I've had my clio for 3 years now and its my first car, but i want to change for an mx5. Im looking for an NA, UK spec as the imports are £1000 more to insure and i can't justify that.

I want to ideally spend under £1500, and ive found plenty for around that price range, but most are 1.6s.

Am i better going for the 1.8? or is the 1.6 very similar? So far all i've really found is that the 1.6 is more revvy etc. But i've not actually seen any comparisons between the two engines and which is better.

Any help would be much appreciated.


DennisTheMenace

15,605 posts

290 months

Sunday 25th April 2010
quotequote all
The 1.8 has a nice bit of torque but i dont think the 1.6 is that much worse , it really depends what you want , mine is in the classifieds for sale , but will be on these minilites and not the yeollow jobbies (shameless plug)


NiceCupOfTea

25,531 posts

273 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
Selling, Dennis? yikes Say it ain't so?

stormrider2

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
That one looks good, funnily enough, it's a British Racing Green one im looking at currently, 1.8, £1600 with 78k on the clock.

Got a link to the for sale ad for yours? it'll probably be too far away from me though.

I'm more tempted by the 1.8 for the extra power, although the lower insurance and running costs of the 1.6 is making me indecisive. Its a 40bhp difference between the two isnt it?


Norbury90

6,909 posts

228 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
I heard that there is very little between them, and that the owners of either engine say their engine is the better one. The 1.8 is heavier too IIRC.

If it reduces your insurance significantly, then I imagine it would be a wise decision.

GravelBen

16,324 posts

252 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
stormrider2 said:
I'm more tempted by the 1.8 for the extra power, although the lower insurance and running costs of the 1.6 is making me indecisive. Its a 40bhp difference between the two isnt it?
From '94 (maybe?) onwards UK 1.6's were detuned to 90bhp to create a bigger gap to the 130bhp 1.8, 1.6's before this were 115bhp so not much difference in power - the 1.8 has a bit more low-down torque and the 1.6 is a bit revvier but you'd be hard pressed to actually call one better than the other in an early Mk1.

stormrider2

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
Cheers. Ill look into the early 1.6s as well then.

The car will be my daily drive, im assuming in winter, although i'll be colder, it's still fairly easy to live with?i'll probably get a hard top for it which would be used for winter.

A few people i've spoken to say the cars are a handful when in the wet? I don't drive like an idiot so i'm guessing i won't have any problems?

GravelBen

16,324 posts

252 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
They're only a handful with crap tyres or an incompetent driver - provided the alignment is right an MX5 is about the most progressive, controllable car on the limit I've driven. Keep your inputs smooth and build you confidence up gradually if you're unfamiliar with RWD and you'll be fine.

bluetone

2,047 posts

241 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
^^^^^ This.

Keep an eye on the tyre tread depth on the rears; if/when they are substantially worse than the fronts, swap them around. Good grip on the front + poor on the rears = oversteer city. Just be aware that if you boot it out of a wet corner/roundabout, the rear may step-out some - eventually you will learn to enjoy this aspect of driving a well-balanced RWD car smile

MX-5 Lazza

7,954 posts

241 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
You also won't be colder in winter - far from it! The heater is strong enough to cook your feet and as the cabin area is so small it warms up really quickly so warmth really isn't a problem. Alternatively, wear a warm coat, hat, gloves & scarf and put the top down all year round - winter is a great time for top-down motoring, I prefer it to summer driving driving

With Mk1s the plastic rear window can take some clearing, especially without AC but it's only just behind your head so a quick wipe with a rag is quick & easy. Just don't be tempted to scrape ice/knock snow off it because it gets pretty fragile at those temps wink

bluetone

2,047 posts

241 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
With Mk1s the plastic rear window can take some clearing, especially without AC but it's only just behind your head so a quick wipe with a rag is quick & easy. Just don't be tempted to scrape ice/knock snow off it because it gets pretty fragile at those temps wink
yes

I am fortunate enough to have off-street parking and deploy old towels to cover windscreen and rear screen when a frost is looking likely.

Also, never drop the hood with the screen in-place, unzip it first if you want to avoid cracking it..

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

231 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
Either mine is set up very badly (possible) or people are ridiculously precious about oversteer. Some days I can't get mine to slide even when I'm trying hehe

bluetone

2,047 posts

241 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
Either mine is set up very badly (possible) or people are ridiculously precious about oversteer. Some days I can't get mine to slide even when I'm trying hehe
Works for me if I'm really trying on a trackday; the lack of diff results in mucho grande smoke off the inside rear tyre on the exit of hairpins smile

Shortly after I got my MX5 and before I'd gotten around to replacing the shonky rubber it came on, I was on the way to Silverstone in the pishing rain and had quite a large unintended 'moment' coming off a roundabout and on to the entry of a M1 slip road; I got it back together without too much fishtailing.... paperbag I swapped the worn rears with the OK fronts ASAP and then changed to F1 GSD3's on 15" = much grippier than the econo-shyyte tyres the car came with.

CatfishCKY

904 posts

194 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
I don't find mine to get the tail out too often either. It's the 1.8iS with the LSD, but I don't think that makes a whole heap of difference!
OP, I say go for the 1.6 and start from there - I wish I had started with a 1.6 if I'm honest. The fuel consumption might not have been such a shock and still would have gone some lol

stormrider2

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
biggrin these are the kind of replies i was hoping for, thanks guys. Car might have to be put off due to the clio needing a service and a smashed iphone screen needing repaired frown.

But i've decided that 1.6 or 1.8 doesnt matter, if its a good example at a decent price, im gonna go for it. Going to find out insurance differences though.

NiceCupOfTea

25,531 posts

273 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
I've not driven the 1.6 but I don't imagine the fuel economy is much better. You will spend most if your time revving every last drop of power from it (or else you're doing it wrong!) and as a result will probably see an average of 25mpg!

Mine's supposed to have an LSD but to be blunt somebody could I have removed it and I wouldn't know! To get the back end out you have to provoke it IMHO - easy on roundabouts in the wet or ice, or if your rears are getting a touch low...

crofty1984

16,829 posts

226 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
stormrider2 said:
That one looks good, funnily enough, it's a British Racing Green one im looking at currently, 1.8, £1600 with 78k on the clock.

Got a link to the for sale ad for yours? it'll probably be too far away from me though.

I'm more tempted by the 1.8 for the extra power, although the lower insurance and running costs of the 1.6 is making me indecisive. Its a 40bhp difference between the two isnt it?
Yes and no.
Someone will correct me if I'm wrong I'm sure but I believe it goes:
1989: 1.6 released with about 115bhp
1994-ish: 1.8 released with 130bhp.
Mazda say "can't be having that, people won't pay the extra to have a 1.8"
1.6 is then detuned down to 90bhp in some markets (including the UK)

So if you have a eunos 1.6 or an early UK 1.6 you'll have close to what the 1.8 makes.
I have an early import. I was looking for a 1.8 just as you are. Bought my 1.6 and can honestly say I don't regret it. For the sake of 15 bhp You get so much more choice at a lower budget.

DennisTheMenace

15,605 posts

290 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
Selling, Dennis? yikes Say it ain't so?
Afraid so frown a move to south africa means i have to sell up cry Want the little green fella to go to a good home .

NiceCupOfTea

25,531 posts

273 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
DennisTheMenace said:
NiceCupOfTea said:
Selling, Dennis? yikes Say it ain't so?
Afraid so frown a move to south africa means i have to sell up cry Want the little green fella to go to a good home .
Good luck with that chap, was looking forward to having a chat at an MX-5 meet sometime!

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

240 months

Monday 26th April 2010
quotequote all
IME the only difference between the early "115bhp" 1.6 and the 1.8 is that sometimes you'll have to drop a gear on a hill in the 1.6 where the 1.8 would happily carry the same gear in exactly the same circumstances.

The 1.8 is a better base for mods from what I've heard due to a beefier clutch, and more chassis bracing on the later cars - very little in it if you're keeping things standard though.

On good tyres it's almost embarrassingly unstickable. Even on rubbish tyres they're easy to rescue from any mishaps, it's just they're more likely to break loose. Watch for lack of ABS on many, particularly early cars; brakes are powerful and easy to lock if you're not smooth on them.

Oh, and don't buy one with any rust. (There are lots out there with rot in the sills, arches, etc.) It can be dealt with, but getting it done properly in a way which ensures it won't come back will probably cost far, far more than what you'd save in purchase price. This sometimes makes the JDM Eunos variants a better bet with Japan's unsalted roads, although you can lose out on stiffer insurance premiums with those.

(JDM cars often have air conditioning, nice extras, and a lower purchase price to make up for it though.)