Ceramic bezel......why?
Ceramic bezel......why?
Author
Discussion

DjSki

Original Poster:

1,331 posts

226 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Open question gents.... I see the Rolex now have ceramic bezels as do the new Omega PO's.

Why is this "better"? Whats the point? When they say ceramic, what exactly is the material?

Cheers!

Shaw Tarse

31,903 posts

234 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Don't drop it!

kman

1,108 posts

242 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
DjSki said:
Open question gents.... I see the Rolex now have ceramic bezels as do the new Omega PO's.

Why is this "better"? Whats the point? When they say ceramic, what exactly is the material?

Cheers!
its virtually scratch proof, uv and corrosion resistant.

al1991

4,552 posts

211 months

Friday 28th October 2011
quotequote all
Gimmick?

DjSki

Original Poster:

1,331 posts

226 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
Gimmick sounds about right....

glazbagun

15,380 posts

228 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
It's more resistant to scratches and discolouration, and harder to produce (and thus fake) than earlier inserts. Like so may things, it will only be proved a good (or otherwise) idea after twenty years, but I'd wager on it being an improvement. The value of the improvement is, as ever, up to the buyer to decide.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

240 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
al1991 said:
Gimmick?
Absolutely.
I'd sooner have an insert that faded slightly over a long period and was slightly scratched, rather than one that could shatter if I dropped or knocked the watch.
Too blingy looking IMO.

Ikemi

8,610 posts

236 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
It's a nice addition if you like your watches to include interesting materials - I like the use of carbon fibre, titanium, tungsten etc, providing it is done in a tasteful way smile

white90

2,402 posts

215 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
Like everything in life you pays your money and you takes your choice.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

273 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
It's a nice addition if you like your watches to include interesting materials - I like the use of carbon fibre, titanium, tungsten etc, providing it is done in a tasteful way smile
Well, quite. hehe

FarmyardPants

4,394 posts

249 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
It's zirconium oxide if memory serves - I have a Junghans mega solar ceramic which is made of the stuff (including the bracelet) and it looks the same as it did when I bought it 5 years ago, except for where the bracelet clasp is scratched from dragging on the desk as I type on a computer all day. It's certainly a hardy substance and always comes up with a glassy shine with a quick wipe. It's the new Bakelite smile

Edit here's a pic of the Junghans for those interested



Edited by FarmyardPants on Saturday 29th October 21:52

Ari

19,828 posts

246 months

Saturday 29th October 2011
quotequote all
Cool watch! Rado have used ceramic to great effect for years. Looks good, and stays that way.

Ikemi

8,610 posts

236 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Ikemi said:
It's a nice addition if you like your watches to include interesting materials - I like the use of carbon fibre, titanium, tungsten etc, providing it is done in a tasteful way smile
Well, quite. hehe
It's a fine line! biggrin IMHO, a watch with a carbon fibre bezel or a carbon fibre dial is acceptable. However a watch with CF dial and a CF bezel is just a bit garish, although I'm sure there are some exceptions! smile

Murph7355

42,034 posts

287 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
...Like so may things, it will only be proved a good (or otherwise) idea after twenty years, but I'd wager on it being an improvement....
I have a cermaic IWC that is nearing 20yrs old, and it's spot on perfect. So I suspect the claims will hold true.