New or Old Seamaster
New or Old Seamaster
Author
Discussion

mcpiston

Original Poster:

297 posts

200 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I recently had the opportunity to try on the new Seamaster (Blue face).
Purely on looks alone and leaving updated movements aside, I felt the old
Seamaster was a nicer looking watch.

Probably a little bias as I have the older version myself.

Would be interested in hearing peoples thoughts smile

Ray Singh

3,084 posts

261 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I am biased too, but have and prefer the older pieces.

bry1975

1,246 posts

194 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
IMO the old SMP will be a better investment.

mcpiston

Original Poster:

297 posts

200 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I think it was a mistake to do away with the wave pattern as well. Ceramic dial is quite nice though.

Pugster

460 posts

212 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
I personally think the new one only works in black. The blue one just doesn't look right to me

bry1975

1,246 posts

194 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
Buy or keep the old one as replacement parts are quite affordable compared to the NEW model.

Bry

LukeBird

17,170 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
Pugster said:
I personally think the new one only works in black. The blue one just doesn't look right to me
Me too.
I don't dislike the new one, I just think it's a bit shiny. Pretty much the same problem afflicts all modern versions of 'tool watches' though...

noumenon

1,282 posts

235 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Why did they drop the wavy pattern? Isn't that the signature for this watch?

I have the old (pre co-axial) version from 1999ish and am not planning to change anytime soon.

bry1975

1,246 posts

194 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Me thinks perhaps it's a good idea to stock up with the old dials!? biggrin

Spice_Weasel

2,368 posts

284 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
noumenon said:
Why did they drop the wavy pattern? Isn't that the signature for this watch?

I have the old (pre co-axial) version from 1999ish and am not planning to change anytime soon.
Me too but from 97. I love the wavy dial

JohnnyE

55 posts

205 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Although I am biased as these pics are of mine... the loss of the wavy dial is a BIG mistake IMO.




gareth h

4,329 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st December 2011
quotequote all
mcpiston said:
I think it was a mistake to do away with the wave pattern as well. Ceramic dial is quite nice though.
I agree, I bought a planet ocean but really miss the wave pattern on the face of my old seamaster

al1991

4,552 posts

211 months

Wednesday 21st December 2011
quotequote all
The old one for me.

The new one looks a bit 'cartoony' to me, similar to the new Rolex Explorer.


Dibble

13,292 posts

271 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Old one for me too.

In my case, my Dad's 1956 one, which is nothing at all like the current/recent crop!

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
The properly old ones are the nicest.

This 1963 "Big Triangle" use to be mine


darreni

4,549 posts

301 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
1999 SMP:


NJH

3,021 posts

240 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
I agree with Andy, a rebuild from new parts SM300 would be really lovely.

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
NJH said:
I agree with Andy, a rebuild from new parts SM300 would be really lovely.
I've had a Watchco one as well





Classic looks + decent lume & good WR - What's not to like?

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm a wavy dial man. Freshly liberated NOS...


ApexJimi

27,782 posts

274 months

Monday 26th December 2011
quotequote all
I fookin' adore that watch, and that's something I've never said of any Omega