Anchors and Subs...
Anchors and Subs...
Author
Discussion

oktapod

Original Poster:

348 posts

212 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
Quick question: isn't a new Rolex Submariner meant to come with a little anchor pendant thingy?

Just wanted to check whether I should have one or not.

Ta.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

199 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
Worst I've just got a new Rolex thread, ever. wink

oktapod

Original Poster:

348 posts

212 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
tongue out

Serious question, though. I've bought the watch with an eye to passing it onto my eldest son when he turns 25 and I don't want to find that it's missing any of the bits that it ought to have...

dustybottoms

512 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
I know nothing about modern Subs and when you say a new Sub I am assuming you mean a ceramic one, but I was under the impression Anchors haven't been a part of the set for years...I could be mistaken on this though.


whoami

13,201 posts

271 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
oktapod said:
Quick question: isn't a new Rolex Submariner meant to come with a little anchor pendant thingy?

Just wanted to check whether I should have one or not.

Ta.
They discontinued this a few years ago.

oktapod

Original Poster:

348 posts

212 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
Thanks - that's all I need to know. It's not the ceramic sub, it's a 14060M. The replacement isn't due until the end of the year and is chunkier and squarer than the 14060M, so less desirable to me.

It's my first decent watch (my previous watch was a Seiko which I still think is a fine timepiece, but it's definitely not in this league) so I'm learning all the time. Very pleased with it, and in around 20 years I shall pass it onto my son when he hits 25. Meantime, I will wear it and acquire something along the lines of a 2009 Sea Dweller for my second son so that he gets something arguably as good/desirable.

Anyway, thanks for the answer.

whoami

13,201 posts

271 months

Thursday 19th April 2012
quotequote all
oktapod said:
Thanks - that's all I need to know. It's not the ceramic sub, it's a 14060M. The replacement isn't due until the end of the year and is chunkier and squarer than the 14060M, so less desirable to me.

It's my first decent watch (my previous watch was a Seiko which I still think is a fine timepiece, but it's definitely not in this league) so I'm learning all the time. Very pleased with it, and in around 20 years I shall pass it onto my son when he hits 25. Meantime, I will wear it and acquire something along the lines of a 2009 Sea Dweller for my second son so that he gets something arguably as good/desirable.

Anyway, thanks for the answer.
Excellent choice. Every collection needs one.