So I was thinking about my "collection" ...
So I was thinking about my "collection" ...
Author
Discussion

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
(Apologies in advance for a slightly self indulgent post ... )

But thinking about my collection, such as it is, and what I might get next, I realised that actually it was (in my view) nearly perfect ...

I have a chrono (which happens to be an El Primero):



I have a diver:



a dress watch:



a flieger:



a beater:



a sports watch (i.e. actually for sports where I might need to time something) also filling the quartz requirement ... :



and a vintage:



Apart from the Oris, which is in a category all of its own and will never be sold, everything else has gone.

The El P is the usual daily wearer, competing with the Stowa Flieger or the GO.

I'd very much like a Grand Seiko and a Dornblueth but they aren't really necessary. I think I have a watch for every occasion now.

Gosh.



CardShark

4,264 posts

210 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
I think that you're got just about every base covered there, and with some rather lovely individual watches as well yes I can see why there'd still an itch for the GS and D&S though - both strive for perfection in their own way.

I'm currently down sizing to 5, maybe 6 watches with the aim of covering a simular spectrum as yourself. No El Primeros, Zeniths or Glashuttes in my collection though frownhehe

Edited by CardShark on Wednesday 6th June 23:40

Disco You

3,749 posts

211 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
I wouldn't categorise a reverso as a "dress watch" myself.

Nice collection though smile

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Disco You said:
I wouldn't categorise a reverso as a "dress watch" myself.

Nice collection though smile
Thanks.

How would you categorise a Reverso? Of course it isn't how it was initially intended, but given its size and (apparent) simplicity I think it fits the dress category rather well.

Though of course if it doesn't then I will have an excuse for another watch ... wink

Adrian W

15,623 posts

259 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
tertius said:
Disco You said:
I wouldn't categorise a reverso as a "dress watch" myself.

Nice collection though smile
Thanks.

How would you categorise a Reverso? Of course it isn't how it was initially intended, but given its size and (apparent) simplicity I think it fits the dress category rather well.

Though of course if it doesn't then I will have an excuse for another watch ... wink
I class my Reverso and my D&S as dress watches

Hoofy

80,169 posts

313 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
The problem is that while you have covered each category, you'd chosen the wrong watches, so please keep going. I'll let you know when you've got it right. wink

Bungleaio

6,595 posts

233 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
You need a G shock and Seiko monster

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Bungleaio said:
You need a G shock and Seiko monster
No thanks, really don't appeal ... and anyway which vacant category would they fill ... ?

Hoofy

80,169 posts

313 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
tertius said:
Bungleaio said:
You need a G shock and Seiko monster
No thanks, really don't appeal ... and anyway which vacant category would they fill ... ?
"Beaters that don't really appeal". biggrin

Don1

16,879 posts

239 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
There are some glaring omissions from the collection in my eyes...

A 'bar' watch


A 'fashion' watch


A trackday watch


The watch to rule them all...


Come on fella - pull your finger out! biggrin

RobM83

108 posts

190 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
You're a 'holiday watch' (smart enough to be worn any time, rugged enough to swim and mess around in, not expensive enough to panic about) and a 'jeans watch' (the sort you'd throw on casually without looking scruffy or OTT) from a complete collection wink

mebe

292 posts

174 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
The Flieger looks brilliant - the strap looks much rougher and "worn" than most pictures I've seen, is that an option, a lucky picture or just lots of use?

I like them all. Like the idea of owning a Reverso but not sure if I'd ever actually ever go through with it.

On my list of (mostly achievable) targets would be a Portugese Chrono and something from D&S (choice of the day - 99.1). You don't seem to have either... maybe there is room for one or two more!

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Lots of great comments, thanks guys.

mebe said:
The Flieger looks brilliant - the strap looks much rougher and "worn" than most pictures I've seen, is that an option, a lucky picture or just lots of use?

I like them all. Like the idea of owning a Reverso but not sure if I'd ever actually ever go through with it.

On my list of (mostly achievable) targets would be a Portugese Chrono and something from D&S (choice of the day - 99.1). You don't seem to have either... maybe there is room for one or two more!
A bit of both with the Flieger I think - the previous owner used the strap a fair bit, though on a different watch so it is nicely worn in, but also th epicture just happens to show it perfectly.

As for your other suggestions, The Dornblueth definitely, though I am torn between the simplicity of the 99.1 and the power reserve complication of the 99.3. The Portuguese though I think would overlap with the Zenith, and in truth I prefer the Zenith and think it is the better watch with a better movement.

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
RobM83 said:
You're a 'holiday watch' (smart enough to be worn any time, rugged enough to swim and mess around in, not expensive enough to panic about) and a 'jeans watch' (the sort you'd throw on casually without looking scruffy or OTT) from a complete collection wink
Well the Seiko fills the holiday watch requirement and the Flieger or either Zenith the "jeans" watch role. Good thoughts though, I like those categories ... Perhaps I shall have to accept a couple of new categories ... wink

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Don1 said:
There are some glaring omissions from the collection in my eyes...

A 'bar' watch


A 'fashion' watch


A trackday watch


The watch to rule them all...


Come on fella - pull your finger out! biggrin
Hmm, well some interesting suggestions there ...

B&R just don't appeal, far too big for my wrist.

The fashion watch I think my collection can get by without ... wink

The RM and the Urwerk, well although I admire them immensely I just couldn't imagine spending that much money on a watch even if I were obscenely wealthy, it just seems wrong somehow.

James McScotty

460 posts

175 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Nice collection, but no Rolex, no moon phase, no calendar, and perhaps one too many Zeniths? Very nice choices, though.

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
You've certainly got a decent spread.

A vintage Rolex and / or vintage Omega / Heuer would make nice additions as would something military.

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
andy tims said:
You've certainly got a decent spread.

A vintage Rolex and / or vintage Omega would make nice additions as would something military.
Agreed.

A military watch might fit in the collection nicely.

Personally, I'd change the vintage Zenith for a Heuer or a Seamaster 300, or 1040 movement variant.

However, they are all lovely watches.

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
James McScotty said:
Nice collection, but no Rolex, no moon phase, no calendar, and perhaps one too many Zeniths? Very nice choices, though.
Very very few Rolexes appeal to me I'm afraid, though I would consider a 5513 but that is about all.

Moon phase I detest so no danger of having one of those.

Calendar ... Well I have had a Master Date so perhaps near enough ... ?

One too many Zeniths, oh I don't think so, esp.. since one of them cost me the princely sum of 84 quid.

tertius

Original Poster:

6,914 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th June 2012
quotequote all
Podie said:
andy tims said:
You've certainly got a decent spread.

A vintage Rolex and / or vintage Omega would make nice additions as would something military.
Agreed.

A military watch might fit in the collection nicely.

Personally, I'd change the vintage Zenith for a Heuer or a Seamaster 300, or 1040 movement variant.

However, they are all lovely watches.
Yes, I like the idea of something military and indeed a Heuer, which has long been on my list of makes I would like to own.