Yachtmaster 2 Steel

[Wish]

Being out of the picture for some years now. How has the Yachtmaster 2 been recieved ?
I've got a Yachtmaster platinum currently and would love one of the new ones but feel that I will moly be able to afford the steel single colour.


I like my Yachtmaster as they are quite a rare watch compared to other rolexs. It's nice to spot another on a wrist.

I know the Yachtmaster 1 was really liked but I've always liked mine.



So Yachtmaster 2 ........ Tell me what I need to know :-)


Many thanks.

[yeti]

Usually known as the 'Clown Master'. Not much love for it out there...

[JRewing]

As usual yeti's correct. From what I read it's generally regarded as being quite ostentatious and displaying a useless complication.

However, I quite like them. But I'd much rather choose other Rolex models instead.

[Wish]

Spent all night reading and talking myself in to one. Then. Realised isn't not got the date function.

I can't live without the date ! ... And for that reason, I'm out.

[westberks]

Wish said:

Spent all night reading and talking myself in to one. Then. Realised isn't not got the date function.

I can't live without the date ! ... And for that reason, I'm out.

I'm not sure that i'd put the lack of date even in my top 5 reasons not to buy the YM2.

Rloex just seem unable to do a 'big' watch imo.

[Miguel Alvarez]

It looks better than the gold version.


(if you can't say something nice.......)

[Fittster]

JRewing said:

a useless complication.

Why is it useless? Sure not many people would use it but the same argument can be made for the milgauss and the breitling navitimer.

[DH01]

Remember the opinions on here tend to be very bigoted and sheep like.
The YM2 is a superb watch with a great complication. The bezel command is cool.

[DH01]

The YM was derided for a long time by those 'in the know' as a Submariner in a party frock. The YM and YM2 will eventually be hugely collectible and desirable just by virtue of lower numbers produced . Look at 60's pre Daytona's as a good example, now £100k , new they couldn't give them away !

[westberks]

DH01 said:

Remember the opinions on here tend to be very bigoted and sheep like.
The YM2 is a superb watch with a great complication. The bezel command is cool.

the watch mechanics themselves maybe cool but the YM2 is stuck with that excessive bezel that screams "look at me, I'm a big Rolex"

had they dropped the need to put the watch model name on there it might get away with it as a chunky sports/fit for purpose number.

i can't imagine in this day and age of mass production models that a non limited edition watch such as the YM2 will ever be desired in the same way that vintage rarities are today; they tend to be popular due to oddities such as type face or minor details, something i find hard to imagine with current stock.

[marcosgt]

DH01 said:

Remember the opinions on here tend to be very bigoted and sheep like.
The YM2 is a superb watch with a great complication. The bezel command is cool.

And remember, in some cases, many people have taste - Different isn't ALWAYS good!

The Complication isn't 'useless', but it is of limited appeal and the garish colours mean the watch isn't a popular choice.

If you like it, go for it - Rather than accuse people of being bigots and sheep, just accept that it's the differences that makes people interesting.

Me? If you gave me one, I'd TRY and sell it

M

[PJ S]

As westberks says, the main point of contention for most people, is the model name emblazoned on the lower third of the dial.
Fairly useless complication aside, the YM II bears little resemblance to the original, which many of the detractors prefer of the two.

http://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?274460

[yeti]

DH01 said:

Remember the opinions on here tend to be very bigoted and sheep like.

Interesting. Please do elaborate on what makes your opinions superior?

Edited by yeti on Wednesday 30th October 11:32

[bobbybee]

PJ S said:

As westberks says, the main point of contention for most people, is the model name emblazoned on the lower third of the dial.
Fairly useless complication aside, the YM II bears little resemblance to the original, which many of the detractors prefer of the two.

http://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?274460

The YM II isn't supposed to bear any resemblance to the YM I, just the same as the EXP II doesn't bear any resemblance to the EXP I.

In both cases the II versions add complications the I versions do not have, YM II the regatta timer, and EXP II the 24hr hand & 1 hr step hand.

Personally I like the EXP I (39mm, if they'd sort out the short hands), the EXP II (none clown model) & the YM I, the YM II in steel I'm starting warm to in appearance, but I agree the YM branding puts me off, as does the lack of date and the size of it. Or may be a Pt version where it is all 'sliver' on 'silver' not as in yer face ??

[Jules360]

Well I have the yellow gold one and love it. Will add the SS version soon. I find the 40mm Sub and Daytona too small these days.

[Wish]

I have to admit before find out it didn't have a date I preferred tee look of the white gold one without the blue bezel.

And having Yachtmaster 2 around the bottom isn't the best idea they have ever had !

[audidoody]

Has there ever been a master of a yacht who has ever worn a YM?

Or someone who dwells in the sea wearing a SD (apart from James Cameron)?

I'm pretty sure submariners don't wear Submariners (too many confined spaces to bash against)

And did an explorer ever pack an Explorer (which should be more accurately described as the "Everester")?

What does a GMT become when it is measuring time in zones other than GMT?

And - yes. I do have too much time on my hands (ho ho).

[bobbybee]

audidoody said:

Has there ever been a master of a yacht who has ever worn a YM?

Or someone who dwells in the sea wearing a SD (apart from James Cameron)?

I'm pretty sure submariners don't wear Submariners (too many confined spaces to bash against)

And did an explorer ever pack an Explorer (which should be more accurately described as the "Everester")?

What does a GMT become when it is measuring time in zones other than GMT?

And - yes. I do have too much time on my hands (ho ho).

Yes I've worn a YM on a yacht, well floating Gin Palace in Monaco
Yes I've worn a Submariner, in a mini sub (experience day type thing)
Yes I've worn an EXP-II, while in a city I've never been to before drinking in pubs I've never frequented before, so I was 'exploring' the city night life

A GMT is still a GMT no matter where it is, if a horse is born in a pig sty it doesn't make it a pig

[audidoody]

Are you a Rolex salesman?

[bobbybee]

Nope, used cars