Which Panerai ?
Author
Discussion

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
I'm toying with the idea of an OP - would need to be 44 not 45 or 47 dues to thin wrists - tempted by the Luminor 1950 style and not asking about look as that's obviously personal (whether date/power reserve/style of dial etc) but what's the feeling as to which movement is best regarded? Probably a can of worms type question but be interested to hear from some who have owned OPs - I have looked at the 3 day, the manual wind 8 day, and the 10 day auto and I'm aware of the price difference for the longer power reserve and that there are also lots of price differentials created by the low volume specials etc etc

jonty247

15 posts

205 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
Have a you looked at a PAM 392?

I'm drawn to the fact that it's a 42mm, as well as an in-house OP auto movement. On the wrist (mine are quite thin) it wears better than the 44's.

Give one a try!

Zingari

947 posts

204 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
PAM233 GMT. End of

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
Thanks guys but can someone engage with the question rather than default to the recommendation - why for ea ple are you saying 8 day rather than the 10 day which appears pretty well identical - is the manual wind 8 day the better regarded movement rather than the 10 day auto or the3 day auto??

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
By which I mean what is the case for or against PAM 320, 270 or 233 ?

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
FlyingTrotter said:
Thanks guys but can someone engage with the question rather than default to the recommendation
You're probably asking in the wrong forum with PH. There are not THAT many WIS's here.

Never visited either, but why not try here

http://www.paneristi.com/

or

http://www.paneraisource.com/forum/

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
Thanks Andy. Will do

yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
andy tims said:
You're probably asking in the wrong forum with PH. There are not THAT many WIS's here.
Yeah; it will probably just be a 'get the one I've got as it's the best!' comments smile

tz-uk is good too, but tough to sign up to...

AFAIK, the in-house movement, develeoped with a helping hand from Richemont big brother JLC, are all well regarded. A 3 Day reserve is more than adequate, 8 nice, 10 excessive for the extra money. Biggest decision is perhaps do you like Luminor or Radiomir? I'm a Rad man smile

FWIW I tried on a PAM372 the other day, historic 47mm 1950s case... It looked great on, really comfortable and I have very skinny 6.75" wrists. More about how they sit than the diameter of the watch and a also Radiomir gererally wears smaller than a Luminor due to the wire lugs.

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
yeti said:
tz-uk is good too, but tough to sign up to...
I've started a thread on TZ-UK

ferdi p

1,537 posts

203 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
Can't help but my 00423 arrives tomorrow smile

http://www.prestigetime.com/images/watches/pam0042...

yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
andy tims said:
I've started a thread on TZ-UK
Let the bunfight begin then smile

See you over there later...

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
Thanks guys - saw initial responses

Zingari

947 posts

204 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
I have a PAM196 Daylight which is auto. As it doesn't get worn very often and this is likely to be your case then a manual will be fine. 1950 style are sought after and hold their price (actually most/all do).

Take account that these watches are BIG - not so much in diameter but case depth. I cannot wear my PAM with a single cuff shirt and double cuff is awkward so casual wear only.

Take a look over at Paneristi.com from some inspiration.

yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Zingari said:
Take account that these watches are BIG - not so much in diameter but case depth.
I think that's what impressed me so much with the 372; it was a actually a very slim case and sat very flat on my wrist. Impressive piece...

westberks

1,461 posts

166 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
i've been giving my Luminor a bit of wrist time after getting a service sorted out.

have to say i'm glad i did as it was playing up but has run perfectly for the past 3 days and is lovely to wear as a casual watch; if you wanted to wear with a suit i'd definately consider the radiomir instead.

as for the movements, follow all the others over to TZ!

darreni

4,549 posts

301 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Here are a couple of pics to show the size differences

L-r -Full size seamaster, 44mm Luminor case, 47mm 1950 case.




ferdi p

1,537 posts

203 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
Got mine today, love it...


yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
10 years of love now cloud9


scorchio

234 posts

200 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
For me it's got to be the pam 00005 , seriously tempted to get one for when our first baby boy is born in April as a future hand me down to him wink

FlyingTrotter

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

186 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for all the contributions chaps - tried another one on and I'm not completely sold on the idea - will do some more mulling over and it may be that if I do go this route it will be for the watch after next rather than the next one