2014 IWC Aquatimer
2014 IWC Aquatimer
Author
Discussion

DMJ73

Original Poster:

74 posts

212 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Just seen this - not sure if its been posted already



Potential new purchase for this year

BAEM

94 posts

202 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
DMJ73 said:
Just seen this - not sure if its been posted already



Potential new purchase for this year
Very nice indeed - any know the likely RRP? Particularly of the black jobbie?

Spice_Weasel

2,368 posts

284 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
Strange how the Aquatimer has gone back to an internal bezel (like the 3538-series) once more. Do these models replace the 3568-series ?

graeme4130

3,955 posts

212 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
BAEM said:
DMJ73 said:
Just seen this - not sure if its been posted already



Potential new purchase for this year
Very nice indeed - any know the likely RRP? Particularly of the black jobbie?
If that replaces the existing chrono then you're looking at circa £5k

chris56

1,408 posts

210 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
According to the IWC website, the new range of Aquatimers completely replaces the old range.
I have not seen any price details but £5K or thereabouts seems likely.
I have a Galapagos Aquatimer and do not wear it that much due to the case thickness. The new models are even thicker - the Rose Gold Perpetual one ise 19mm.
IWC need to sort this out as it restricts the wearability of what are attractive watches. 19mm must be like wearing a block of flats on your wrist!

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
chris56 said:
According to the IWC website, the new range of Aquatimers completely replaces the old range.
I have not seen any price details but £5K or thereabouts seems likely.
I have a Galapagos Aquatimer and do not wear it that much due to the case thickness. The new models are even thicker - the Rose Gold Perpetual one ise 19mm.
IWC need to sort this out as it restricts the wearability of what are attractive watches. 19mm must be like wearing a block of flats on your wrist!
Slightly off topic, but i just missed out on a Galapagos on eBay earlier this week. Went for £2550 which I think is no money for a mint and boxed example. I watched it for a week and forgot to bid!

Never fancied one before but it just looked 'right'. oh well

I take your point though Chris56 about the wearability.

Vvroom.

graeme4130

3,955 posts

212 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
chris56 said:
According to the IWC website, the new range of Aquatimers completely replaces the old range.
I have not seen any price details but £5K or thereabouts seems likely.
I have a Galapagos Aquatimer and do not wear it that much due to the case thickness. The new models are even thicker - the Rose Gold Perpetual one ise 19mm.
IWC need to sort this out as it restricts the wearability of what are attractive watches. 19mm must be like wearing a block of flats on your wrist!
Blimey, that's huge
You'd need some serious sleeves or cuffs for that to slip under
I wear my IWC most days and the depth is about the limit of what I'd wear


tuffer

9,021 posts

298 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
Well they are better than the last version but other than that....MEH!