Rolex Sub 18k gold and Steel blue face
Rolex Sub 18k gold and Steel blue face
Author
Discussion

jonny70

Original Poster:

1,280 posts

189 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
A relative of mine is after a 2nd hand Sub 2 tone blue face .Seeing as im a stainless steel man myself .

whats the going rate for non ceramic and ceramic ones? how much should one pay?

Sy1441

1,283 posts

191 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Dependant on year but anything from around £4-6.5k for a non-ceramic and £6.5-£8 for a ceramic.

aeropilot

40,869 posts

258 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Sy1441 said:
Dependant on year but anything from around £4-6.5k for a non-ceramic and £6.5-£8 for a ceramic.
You'll be lucky laugh

The OP is asking about the 18k with blue face Sub, not S/S Subs wink


I'd say you'd be looking at 10-12k for an earlier 16618 Sub and 15k+ for a newer 116618 Sub.

yeti

10,703 posts

306 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
The OP is asking about the 18k with blue face Sub, not S/S Subs wink
The words 'two-tone' suggest the bi-metal watches to me so 16613 or 116613 ceramic. Prices seem accurate, but do your won research on chrono24 to confirm.

Lovely watches... I never used to like them, now they look superb!

aeropilot

40,869 posts

258 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
yeti said:
aeropilot said:
The OP is asking about the 18k with blue face Sub, not S/S Subs wink
The words 'two-tone' suggest the bi-metal watches to me so 16613 or 116613 ceramic.
scratchchin

Re-reading it that way, you're probably right.

Just automatically assume anyone mentioning 18k means, just that, rather than the little bit of 18k on a a bi-metal.

jhw333

95 posts

162 months

Saturday 31st May 2014
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
scratchchin

Re-reading it that way, you're probably right.

Just automatically assume anyone mentioning 18k means, just that, rather than the little bit of 18k on a a bi-metal.
He didn't mention 18k did he?

aeropilot

40,869 posts

258 months

Saturday 31st May 2014
quotequote all
jhw333 said:
aeropilot said:
scratchchin

Re-reading it that way, you're probably right.

Just automatically assume anyone mentioning 18k means, just that, rather than the little bit of 18k on a a bi-metal.
He didn't mention 18k did he?
Thread title....... wink

jhw333

95 posts

162 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Thread title....... wink
Been a long week!

crostonian

2,427 posts

203 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
Just a note, the first of the ceramics had a flat blue face but last year it was replaced(?) with the blue sunburst dial.

michael gould

5,698 posts

272 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
Many don't like the ceramic subs which is why late 16613 are increasing in value ......they stopped making them in 2009 ( I think)

alanm_3

370 posts

270 months

Sunday 1st June 2014
quotequote all
The original ceramic TT subs had that awful flat blue face. Not nice at all, looked almost like a fake! shoot

yeti

10,703 posts

306 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
alanm_3 said:
The original ceramic TT subs had that awful flat blue face. Not nice at all, looked almost like a fake! shoot
It weirdly suited the white gold version I thought...