Rado
Author
Discussion

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Whilst I have heard of Rado as a manufacturer of watches, I don't know anything about them or how well their watches are perceived. I've seen a Rado watch that I like the look of so would it be a worthwhile purchase?

Big Al.

69,336 posts

288 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Bought mine 9 years ago, wear it everyday it's been through hell and back and still looks stunning. Would I buy another too bloody right but not until this one goes pop, can't see that happening in the short term.

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Thanks Big Al. I've been looking for a skeleton watch for ages without having to pay through the nose for something that is almost bespoke. Finally found one that I like, that is also a bit different, by Rado, but as I said in my original post, I don't know much about them.

SturdyHSV

10,443 posts

197 months

Sunday 18th December 2016
quotequote all
I've had a Rado Ceramica for about 9 years, as Big Al said, still looks remarkably tidy considering I've worn it 24/7 (aside from swimming) for that 9 years. It's been through hell, being banged against brick walls, scraped against things, everything you'd imagine as I wear it on my right wrist but am right handed.

I'm in a similar position in that I want a skeleton, and personally I only really want a ceramic one so that I know it will stay looking as new even if I wear it every day.

If it's any help, the Centrix skeleton actually looks better on the wrist than it does in person. I've tried on the one with the mixed colour strap (ceramic inserts in stainless steel) and it looked better than I thought as I didn't like it at first glance. I've also seen someone wearing one once and it looked quite nice on.

I've tried a centrix with a leather strap, but compared to my Ceramica (which is the XL) it felt tiny on my arm, so I'm not sure if it's for me.

They are around the £1,300 mark.

There's the Rado True Thinline Skeleton which is a lovely looking thing, available either in black or 'silver', this being the heat treated ceramic that turns silver and looks like a dark metal but with the ceramic properties. There were 500 of each colour made I think, and are nearer the £4,000 mark.

The one I think I want is the Rado True Open Heart, which is a skeleton with a very thin layer of mother of pearl as the face, so you can see through it in the light, it creates a really great effect and to me is a really interesting idea.

They are around £1,700 and again, 500 made.

Rado aren't held in the same regard as the 'big names', but they make very interesting looking watches and often come up with new materials to make watches from. Personally I quite like that they're lesser known, as it's less flashy whilst still letting you enjoy a fascinating watch every day smile

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Sunday 18th December 2016
quotequote all
Yeah, it's the Centrix I've been looking at, purely because it's slightly quirky and a bit different.

mikeveal

5,139 posts

280 months

Monday 19th December 2016
quotequote all
Rado are a good, often overlooked brand.
Today I just happen to have one of these on:

It's a 1965 Diastar chronometer, made with a tungsten carbide case and a faceted sapphire crystal. 51 years old and there's not a mark on it - scratchproof has become Rado's "thing".

If you find a Rado you like, go for it. They are decent watches.
You should know that the ceramic watches don't react well to being dropped on hard surfaces though. You'll never scratch it, but you may shatter it!