Uniques designs - who does them?
Uniques designs - who does them?
Author
Discussion

Dempsey1971

Original Poster:

383 posts

192 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
It's an interesting observation that many watch makers, established, newish or new, are accused of copying others designs, that they are somehow 'homages', and word that seems to send a collective shudder down the spine of watch enthusiasts.

So, without resorting to very high end exotica, which makers do 'unique' designs. I mean, even the fabled Submariner is ultimately an 'homage' to the Fifty Fathoms, and the Daytona and Speedmaster could be twins, so even big brands do it. How different does a watch have to be before it can be considered 'unique'. Is a watch that 'looks bit like' another watch (i.e. has a rotating bezel, a date at 3, and a generic oyster type bracelet) really a copy?


Thoughts?

Yell_M3

389 posts

222 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
Corum.

marcosgt

11,418 posts

198 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
Dempsey1971 said:
... and the Daytona and Speedmaster could be twins...

Thoughts?
Well, in that they're both chronos, don't see that much similarity generally though...

M

Hoofy

79,222 posts

304 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
Enzo Mechana?

Kaventsmann?

mickyc79

672 posts

130 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
I have recently bought this 1980's soviet Raketa... Pretty unique! They do offer a modern automatic now as well....https://raketa-shop.com/w/en/copernicus/281-raketa-copernicus-s184.html


nikaiyo2

5,689 posts

217 months

Thursday 2nd May 2019
quotequote all
Bell & Ross
Panerai
Romain Jerome
Ennebi
Cartier
Gshock

lostkiwi

4,585 posts

146 months

Friday 3rd May 2019
quotequote all
Graham
U-Boat

BS62

1,975 posts

188 months

Monday 6th May 2019
quotequote all
Depending on who you ask, everything’s a homage to a submariner...apparently...which is in itself a copy of other circular, bezel eqiupped diving watches.

The use of the word ‘homage’ seems to me, to be snobbery based (except in the case of blatant copies like stuff from steinhart and rotary. If it’s a circular watch with roman or arabic numerals, lines or dots, a bezel (or not), some mid-face little dials in a triangle or a row or a column, and either 3, 4, 5 or 6 hands with pointy bits or round bits or blunt bits at the ends, someone’s already done it.

So the answer is: Apple. They do a squarish watch that tells you when your phone’s ringing and how many steps you’ve done and when your mate tags you in an inappropriate photo on social media and tons more stuff. :P

ZesPak

26,003 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
BS62 said:
So the answer is: Apple. They do a squarish watch that tells you when your phone’s ringing and how many steps you’ve done and when your mate tags you in an inappropriate photo on social media and tons more stuff. :P
Tonnes before en even more after that design though.

Some brands still have their identity and are just too small to be copied.
A lot of micro brands I'd say.

I like my Magrette, I even ordered another one (bronze this time). I don't think I've seen a watch so far that could be confused for one at a distance or vice versa.

Hoofy

79,222 posts

304 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
BS62 said:
So the answer is: Apple. They do a squarish watch that tells you when your phone’s ringing and how many steps you’ve done and when your mate tags you in an inappropriate photo on social media and tons more stuff. :P
Is that the one that looks like a Sony Smartwatch that came out 3 years before Apple's first one?

BS62

1,975 posts

188 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
BS62 said:
So the answer is: Apple. They do a squarish watch that tells you when your phone’s ringing and how many steps you’ve done and when your mate tags you in an inappropriate photo on social media and tons more stuff. :P
Is that the one that looks like a Sony Smartwatch that came out 3 years before Apple's first one?
Yes. I believe you’ll find that was itself also a blatant homage of a submariner as it is intended to be worn on the wrist.

Hoofy

79,222 posts

304 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
BS62 said:
Hoofy said:
BS62 said:
So the answer is: Apple. They do a squarish watch that tells you when your phone’s ringing and how many steps you’ve done and when your mate tags you in an inappropriate photo on social media and tons more stuff. :P
Is that the one that looks like a Sony Smartwatch that came out 3 years before Apple's first one?
Yes. I believe you’ll find that was itself also a blatant homage of a submariner as it is intended to be worn on the wrist.
Well, I don't think they were copying a sub. Maybe the original pocket watch that was attached to the wrist with a strap.

F15hface

26 posts

88 months

Thursday 9th May 2019
quotequote all
The Codek Spiral isn't exactly revolutionary, but is unique in case and dial design.
Klokers do a pretty interesting rotating dial on all their watches.

Voldemort

7,182 posts

300 months

Friday 10th May 2019
quotequote all
The last watch to impress me for originality of design was the Ressence


mikeveal

5,018 posts

272 months

Friday 24th May 2019
quotequote all
Alexander Shorokhoff






Loads more on his website. Not a maker I've ever come across before. Very avant garde, some of the watches look like jumped up swatches, others are rather tempting.

seadragon

1,137 posts

237 months

Wednesday 17th July 2019
quotequote all
Sarpaneva watches

Wadeski

8,810 posts

235 months

Wednesday 17th July 2019
quotequote all
Seiko Tuna?

AlasdairMc

555 posts

149 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
Azimuth produce something unique designs. Many of them seem like gimmicks, but I do like the Spaceship range.

Lorne

543 posts

124 months

Saturday 20th July 2019
quotequote all
Dempsey1971 said:
It's an interesting observation that many watch makers, established, newish or new, are accused of copying others designs, that they are somehow 'homages', and word that seems to send a collective shudder down the spine of watch enthusiasts.

So, without resorting to very high end exotica, which makers do 'unique' designs. I mean, even the fabled Submariner is ultimately an 'homage' to the Fifty Fathoms, and the Daytona and Speedmaster could be twins, so even big brands do it. How different does a watch have to be before it can be considered 'unique'. Is a watch that 'looks bit like' another watch (i.e. has a rotating bezel, a date at 3, and a generic oyster type bracelet) really a copy?


Thoughts?
It's a good observation. A watch is ultimately quite a simple thing; some hands, day & date and possibly a chronometer or other complication, so how do you make it different without also making it impossible to read? You've only got 40 odd mm of 'real estate' to play with and a hundred or so other companies trying to do exactly the same. It's not surprising then that a lot of watches can look like other models, normally quite unintentionally.

I went down the route of starting from scratch and questioning every detail;

With the exception of that chap from Essex, we all know that when the big hand is pointing upwards and the little hand is pointing to the right then it's 3 0-clock, so why write 12 and 3 (or indeed any numbers) on the dial?

How many days of the week actually need three letters to distinguish them from another day? Turns out it can all be done with two letters, so no point having a day indicator that says MON, TUE, WED etc when Mo, Tu, We are just as good.

Watches, with the exception of the brilliant Steve Mcqueen TAG Heuer, are generally roundish sort of things, so why put square and rectangular windows on the dial when round windows are more consistent with the overall look.

And, of course, the 3 0-clock line is quite a nice place to put a name and a logo, so why not move the day and date down to the 4 o-clock line to prevent everything looking too crowded.

Do all the above and what you end up with is: