Bargain sub?
Author
Discussion

okgo

Original Poster:

41,303 posts

219 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all

digger_R

1,808 posts

227 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
okgo said:
and dodgier than a dodgy thing from dodgeville, I'd be quite happy to proven wrong but an extremely grainy scan of a photo.... would you part with 1300 notes without seeing it for that?

okgo

Original Poster:

41,303 posts

219 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Not on your life.

hehe

Dominic H

3,287 posts

253 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
okgo said:
If the watch is marked 16233 is a 100% fake.

mblade123

533 posts

213 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
The No2 on the dates not right. Look at a real one and you will see the difference

Dominic H

3,287 posts

253 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
This pile was on eBay last week....

Asterix

24,438 posts

249 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Not a chance - very dodgy

Stuart

11,638 posts

272 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Chaps, is this ad so dodgy that it is worthy of us pulling? We've made some changes to the classified ads of late and you'll notice that we've created a dedicated watch section. As I'm sure you'll be spending a bit of time in there, I would encourage you to report anything which looks like a scam; we have people who will act quickly to pull any dodgy ads.

Thanks,

Stuart

Stamp

3,609 posts

257 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Stuart said:
Chaps, is this ad so dodgy that it is worthy of us pulling? We've made some changes to the classified ads of late and you'll notice that we've created a dedicated watch section. As I'm sure you'll be spending a bit of time in there, I would encourage you to report anything which looks like a scam; we have people who will act quickly to pull any dodgy ads.

Thanks,

Stuart
I think this is so dodgy, that if the seller protests about it being pulled, he needs to prove it is real.
It may be he bought it as genuine and is needing to sell it on as he has found out.

MrVelox

2,974 posts

208 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Stuart,

That is obviously a fake, looks like a relatively low-grade one at that, you can buy better fakes for $150! The absolute dead giveaway is the date magnification.


cyberface

12,214 posts

278 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Crown guards wrong as well. Not even a 'replica'...

MrVelox

2,974 posts

208 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Let's turn this into a "How to spot a fake" topic.

Here's the watch in question:



Here's a real SS Submariner (Shamelessly swiped pic from eBay)



Subs are probably the most fakes Rolex right now and there are some fakes that I have seen which are VERY tough to spot, unless you have a very trained eye and a loupe, you may find it impossible to tell unless you crack the case open.

Look at the size of the crown above the "ROLEX" script, see how on the Genuine one it is slightly wider?

Notice what cyberface said about the crown guard, or the lugs around the crown.. see the shape differences?

Notice the difference in the date magnification? A Genuine Rolex magnifies the date 2.5 times.

Notice the "Pearl" at the top of the bezel, see how it's not centered in the "V"?

See how the writing on the bezel does not perfectly line up?

A Genuine Rolex is a very high quality item that generally won't have any visible flaws and won't have any signs of imprecise workmanship anywhere on it.

I would be very careful if I were buying an SS sub, there's enough reputable sellers in the UK to buy one from at a reasonable price.

FWIW, that looks like a $25-50 copy. You can buy fakes for $2-300 that are dramatically better than that, they will fool most people on here.

Edited by MrVelox on Friday 24th October 21:35

Dominic H

3,287 posts

253 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
Stuart said:
Chaps, is this ad so dodgy that it is worthy of us pulling? We've made some changes to the classified ads of late and you'll notice that we've created a dedicated watch section. As I'm sure you'll be spending a bit of time in there, I would encourage you to report anything which looks like a scam; we have people who will act quickly to pull any dodgy ads.

Thanks,

Stuart
Stuart,

It's definately wrong. A steel Sub date (from R series '89 onwards) carries the model denomination 16610. The model reference '16233' refers to a gentlemans 36mm steel and yellow metal datejust, a completely different watch.

Hey, if I'm wrong I'll buy it as it's £1000 behind its' market value.

Hope this helps,

Dominic.

Edited by Dominic H on Friday 24th October 21:34

Stuart

11,638 posts

272 months

Friday 24th October 2008
quotequote all
OK, thanks all. I'll get it taken down.

Wasn't really doubting for one moment that this was a fake, more just trying to highlight the fact that, as well as highlighting fakes here, it is worth hitting the "report" button. smile