Replica items.... is it wrong to buy them?
Replica items.... is it wrong to buy them?
Author
Discussion

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,518 posts

215 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
It all started when i was looking around for a watch and wanted an Omega, but I have a nasty habit of breaking and scratching watches and most rings i wear, so I started thinking about a replica one, for circa £150-200 I can get some pretty good replicas from:

So getting past the buying it to show off about something I cant afford... blah.. blah... blah.

Would anyone do buy something that is a replica knowing full well that if it gets damaged they can simply buy another one safe in the knowledge that they havent just damaged a £4k watch, etc.

They seemed to have moved on from the easily identifiable fakes and onto something that looks nigh on identical as the real one, only an expert or yourself would know the difference.

So would you?

Mod Note: Links removed, as they break PH posting rules

Edited by Kinky on Saturday 19th September 20:12

anonymous-user

77 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Dupont666 said:
Would anyone do buy something that is a replica knowing full well that if it gets damaged they can simply buy another one safe in the knowledge that they havent just damaged a £4k watch, etc.

They seemed to have moved on from the easily identifiable fakes and onto something that looks nigh on identical as the real one, only an expert or yourself would know the difference.

So would you?
If its not about buying something to show off etc, why not buy something like a Seiko, which comes in your budget, and is backed up by a warranty if it does break.

Never understood buying counterfeit watches.

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,518 posts

215 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Nyphur said:
Dupont666 said:
Would anyone do buy something that is a replica knowing full well that if it gets damaged they can simply buy another one safe in the knowledge that they havent just damaged a £4k watch, etc.

They seemed to have moved on from the easily identifiable fakes and onto something that looks nigh on identical as the real one, only an expert or yourself would know the difference.

So would you?
If its not about buying something to show off etc, why not buy something like a Seiko, which comes in your budget, and is backed up by a warranty if it does break.

Never understood buying counterfeit watches.
warranty doesnt pay out for knocks and scrapes and thats what im on about, not it breaking down....

Im just a little clumsy and its not like i can change and the amount of watches I have been through by me damaging them is quite bad.

Puggit

49,441 posts

271 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
None of the (Hong Kong) counterfeits I've owned have lasted more than a couple of months.

Bought an Omega in February ('cheap' Seamaster) - not a scratch or mark on it yet. They make them better wink

Brite spark

2,093 posts

224 months

paddyhasneeds

64,200 posts

233 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
No.

As said, buy a Seiko or a G-Shock or something from any one of the respectable manufacturers who make very good and damned near unbreakable watches for £200.

anonymous-user

77 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Brite spark said:
Yeah great post a link to fake watch sites in the watch forum. Good luck with that. hehe

TBH I don't think it's allowed to link to illegal fake watch sites on PHs anyway.

wiffmaster

2,616 posts

221 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
I'm ambivalent about this. If a £2000 watch can be faked convincingly (to the extent that you have to take the back off in order to verify its authenticity) then it suggests that the product may be very overpriced in the first place. That said, you'd feel a right knob wearing the fake - the only reason to buy a fake is to show off, and that strikes me as slightly sad. I'm a student so wear a Citizen EcoDrive; for the same price I could have bought a convincing fake Omega. But, I'd feel like a failed plutocrat wearing a fake 'expensive' watch. If people want to buy fakes then fine - it will keep the manufacturers on their toes and will encourage them to innovate so the designs can't be faked. But, it's not for me.

clarkmagpie

3,665 posts

218 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Some very nice styled watches there for not a lot of money.
I'm quite tempted...

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,518 posts

215 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
so they dont scratch and get damaged very easily?

just asking as my ring the oh got me for my birthday is already riddled with scratches and dont like the idea of having to take to get polished over and over again.

Thats the only reason I ask, I like the omegas, etc.... just dont like the idea of having 1.5k-2k on my wrist getting easily scratched.

paddyhasneeds

64,200 posts

233 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Depends on the finish.

Brushed stainless steel (generally) doesn't mark as easily as polished stainless, either can have fine marks removed with things like fibre glass pens/scotchbrite/cape cod polishing cloths or send it back to the manufacturer every couple of years and it should come back good as new for a couple of hundred quid (maybe a bit more tbh).

Brite spark

2,093 posts

224 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
el stovey said:
Brite spark said:
Yeah great post a link to fake watch sites in the watch forum. Good luck with that. hehe

TBH I don't think it's allowed to link to illegal fake watch sites on PHs anyway.
hehe Shhh had the popcorn ready.
Though this is more of a "watch thread" than "should I buy a replica thread"

posting fakes/counterfeit isn't allowed for computer progs,software, etc- sure watches will be the same, that's one for the mods though.

OzCupra

152 posts

201 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
No, you shouldn't buy replicas / copies.

I work in an industry riddled with copies and replicas and their just not as good and I find they get damaged more easily / break due to inferior production methods and materials used.

I'm the same with watches as you, seem to be very hard on them. I've a G-Shock that I've had since leaving OZ 5 years ago and apart from a few battle scars and a couple of new bands it's been solid as a rock!

Yoshiwaan

322 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
wiffmaster said:
I'm ambivalent about this. If a £2000 watch can be faked convincingly (to the extent that you have to take the back off in order to verify its authenticity)...
I dunno...

I had a mate with a genuine Rado and he'd grab a coin and rub it on the glass of the face and it wouldn't do a thing. I doubt the fake could do that, the components on the genuine are much higher quality.

AdeTuono

7,605 posts

250 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
A decent watch shouldn't scratch anyway. Mrs. Tuono bought me one for a 'landmark' birthday nearly 10 years ago. I've worn it every day since, and it's completely unmarked. Previous watches have lasted 18 months at best before they were almost unreadable,

ipwn

2,920 posts

214 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
I get them from here.

Friend took the top swiss movement Breitling to a service centre in Wakefield. They didn't know it was a fake until they opened it and were told it was fake by him biggrin

They said they wouldn't have noticed if he didn't say anthing and were shocked at how much of a proper quality replica it was.

All the swiss movement ones on that replica site are excellent. I can't justify shelling out 4 figures on just one watch and risk losing or breaking it ! However I do love the styles of them hence buying the replicas.

I have a Patek Phillipe, Panerai, Mont Blanc and a Breitling. All have lasted over 3 years now and are still going. Patek is 5 years old and still working fine biggrin

Mod note: Link removed as it breaks PH posting rules

Edited by Kinky on Saturday 19th September 20:13

VXR_Driver

56 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Why not buy the Omega and a cheaper "daily wearer"?

Even if you only wear the Omega on special occasions, it *will* get scratched to some degree. It's just part of life. Mechanically they are definitely built to last though.


Fatboy

8,255 posts

295 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Yoshiwaan said:
wiffmaster said:
I'm ambivalent about this. If a £2000 watch can be faked convincingly (to the extent that you have to take the back off in order to verify its authenticity)...
I dunno...

I had a mate with a genuine Rado and he'd grab a coin and rub it on the glass of the face and it wouldn't do a thing. I doubt the fake could do that, the components on the genuine are much higher quality.
All Rados and most watches over about £150 will have sapphire crystal glass - much harder than a coin (only thing you'll realistically scratch it with is a diamond).

Try a Tissot on a titanium bracelet, I give my watches a really hard life, and I've never broken a Tissot, only got replacements as presents smile

markmullen

15,877 posts

257 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
A decent watch shouldn't scratch anyway.
It depends on the screen, I wear an Omega Speedmaster Professional (the moonwatch) which has Hesalite (plastic) screen (chosen for space work as if it broke it wouldn't leave loads of shards of broken glass floating about in the spacecraft) and it scratches quite easily.

paddyhasneeds

64,200 posts

233 months

Saturday 19th September 2009
quotequote all
Love to know the mods train of thought sometimes.

By moving this thread into "Watches" by definition it's going to be looked at by a bunch of people who are into watches so hey, guess what, will most probably be anti-replica whilst going ignored by everyone else who may actually have a cheap replica but have no significant interest in watches so simply won't look at the thread and share their views.

Sometimes this sub-forum thing really does seem an own-goal.