Discussion
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Rolex-Submariner-/1404343180...
A Rolex expert that some of you may know about has inspected it and he says it is the real deal. There's talk of it going for over 70 grand. I wish my dad had one of these in his sock drawer!
A Rolex expert that some of you may know about has inspected it and he says it is the real deal. There's talk of it going for over 70 grand. I wish my dad had one of these in his sock drawer!
LukeBird said:
jagman21 said:
Would restoring it lower the value?
If changing the parts, then yes. If just cleaning up what's there, as long as it's not an OTT clean then probably not.
http://newturfers.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4030
Here's an example of a similar watch Mike bought earlier this year, and this shows the correct level of restoration (as little as poss) required for these watches.
http://www.tz-uk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t...
A movement service will be straightforward for any competent Rolex watchmaker.
Here is a small part of Mikes' collection....

Add a great number of perfect COMEX, 1655 Orange Hands, GMT's, Daytonas and you have one of the best collections around...
Have a look at Mike's 'museum' page, and keep going to the bottom of the page.....
http://www.theoldwatchshop.com/museum.html
Nice!
Edited by Dominic H on Saturday 7th August 08:22
AllNines said:
Forgive my ignorance but why is this watch so special? I understand that it is rare but what differences are there to other models of the period?
I am no Rolex fan but I do appreciate the design; compared to most of their stuff it's actually quite pleasing on the (my) eye.
It's a variety of factors I think;I am no Rolex fan but I do appreciate the design; compared to most of their stuff it's actually quite pleasing on the (my) eye.
Rare: (1250 issued in the '70's, very few in the wild, quite a few in sock drawers and more hoarded as above!)
Different: (the milsub handset was something that was put on by the UK MoD, not Rolex)
Provenance: (If you can attach the watch to a serving person who had it on issue then the unique history sets the watch apart from others)
History: Issued by the Navy to divers in the '70's, historical associations with SBS et al.
Intersection of sub-sets: People collect Rolexs', people collect military watches, people collect vintage watches - this covers all those bases and is seen/percieved as being the pinnacle (or close enough) in collecting terms in all domains.
Design: Seen as pretty much the standard for a military type dial, construction is high quality and movement is in-house.
Price: Of course, being a bit more cynical, prices like this become a self-fulfilling prophecy in a sense - it always creates a 'wow' factor.
Something as good is perhaps something like a Tudor Marine National (France) issued watch - same vintage period, same provenance/history, same classic design, same sort of rarity, 'snowflake' hands....but these don't get within a tenth of the value of the Rolex - why? It's just that Rolex thing I think. The Tudors were originally less expensive than the Rolex counterparts, used an ETA movement, more common. Pre-'74 Tudor MN:

Post '74 Tudor MN:

I've got a US military '74 Benrus Type 1 issued diver coming in at the moment, ticks all the boxes of the Rolex/Tudor MN (in fact it was more expensive than the Rolex back in the day and 'may' have been worn by UDT/SEAL over in 'Nam - if you squint a bit & ignore the lack of wear!
) but a wee bit cheaper than the milsub now!

(Not my pics, yet...)
Edited by andy_s on Saturday 7th August 12:49
AllNines said:
andy_s said:
Useful stuff
Thanks Andy. I still can't quite get my head around the value, though. Each to their own, and all that.Arguably it was a good investment in the past and people also see it as an investment piece for the future, but the major gains have been had already I think.
Edited by andy_s on Saturday 7th August 12:55
johnny senna said:
andy_s said:
johnny senna said:
Wow Dom. I take it all Mike's Milsubs in the pic are 70 grand as well?
The UK milsub hands, just the hands, fetch between £11-18k on their own. What was different about the hands? Why were they changed? Why were the other changes made?
I'm sure someone knows better/different though, that's just what I remember reading once.
Edited by andy_s on Saturday 7th August 13:34
sneijder said:
Last time this happened there were mutterings that issued stuff wasn't your property and had to be returned at the end of service.
Does anyone know the legalities ?
Some were lost and the appropriate fine for lost equipment was levied against the enlisted man. Some were purchased by the enlisted that the watches were issued to and a load were sold off at Govt army surplus auctions. Differentiating between the three would be virtually impossible...Does anyone know the legalities ?
Gassing Station | Watches | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




