Mont Blanc Watches
Mont Blanc Watches
Author
Discussion

nine6four

Original Poster:

313 posts

241 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
Afternoon all.

Any idea who makes them, themselves?

Are they in the same league as a proper watch maker or more like a fashion label?

Cheers

Pommygranite

14,472 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
My view is that they are an expensive fashion brand rather than watch maker.

A true watch maker needs to do nothing else but make watches IMHO. MB make pens, leather goods, watches etc.

JungleJim

2,430 posts

243 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
nine6four said:
Afternoon all.

Any idea who makes them, themselves?

Are they in the same league as a proper watch maker or more like a fashion label?

Cheers
as far as i know, their more expensive watches use in-house movements, whilst their cheaper ones are bought-in.

SuperBaaaad

1,816 posts

250 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I really like them, especially this:


Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Proper watch.




About half a million quid I think.

arun1uk

1,068 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I had the same dilemma. Just bought a Montblanc Star. Lovely watch and even though it was just over £1k, it's still got an in-house movement.

Quality and finish is good and I think it's something different to the norm.

tertius

6,914 posts

261 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
arun1uk said:
I had the same dilemma. Just bought a Montblanc Star. Lovely watch and even though it was just over £1k, it's still got an in-house movement.

Quality and finish is good and I think it's something different to the norm.
Umm, I doubt it ... the time only watches are ETA 2892 based, the chronos 7750.

Personally I think they make some nice and interesting watches, but its a bit of a mixed bag overall.

DH01

820 posts

199 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Twinfly Chrono my fave at the moment, about €9k. Lovely thing and don't look like it's a rip off of someone elses design.

Pommygranite

14,472 posts

247 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Soovy said:
Proper watch.



About half a million quid I think.
£163,900 I understand

arun1uk

1,068 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
tertius said:
arun1uk said:
I had the same dilemma. Just bought a Montblanc Star. Lovely watch and even though it was just over £1k, it's still got an in-house movement.

Quality and finish is good and I think it's something different to the norm.
Umm, I doubt it ... the time only watches are ETA 2892 based, the chronos 7750.

Personally I think they make some nice and interesting watches, but its a bit of a mixed bag overall.
Sorry, I stand corrected! The Star is based on an ETA movement and they are COSC approved mechanisms too. Montblanc's owners bought Minerva, which then turned into the Montblanc branded watches so there is some heritage behind the brand (if I've understood it correctly).

nine6four

Original Poster:

313 posts

241 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Interesting, thanks chaps.

Your comments give them credibility and whilst not up there with JLC or IWC suggest a fair alternative for an entry level Omega or Tag?

Cheers

misery

100 posts

288 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
I've got a Montblanc sports watch. I love it and the build quality is excellent.

Disco You

3,749 posts

211 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
nine6four said:
Interesting, thanks chaps.

Your comments give them credibility and whilst not up there with JLC or IWC suggest a fair alternative for an entry level Omega or Tag?

Cheers
I'd say about the same or possibly better than TAG but not as good as Omega.

jon-

16,534 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Bump thread.

Considering a Mont Blanc as can get good (30%) discount, and I've always utterly loved them.

Prices are entry Rolex levels now, now they're pushing more into airports and have a bit more brand image in watches, do you think the second hand values will firm up?

I really don't want to be a sheep and get a Rolex.

Edited by jon- on Wednesday 14th May 15:30

Mr Aston Martin

478 posts

191 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
jon- said:
Bump thread.


I really don't want to be a sheep and get a Rolex.

Edited by jon- on Wednesday 14th May 15:30
Question your prejudices!

I had the same perception about Rolex, ok its not a Patek but my sub goes with just about any attire I choose, the build quality is great and it doesn't stand out as ostentatious. Regarding the brand I appreciate the sentiment of others can be negative but why let other people opinion shape what you do?

jon-

16,534 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Mr Aston Martin said:
jon- said:
Bump thread.


I really don't want to be a sheep and get a Rolex.

Edited by jon- on Wednesday 14th May 15:30
Question your prejudices!

I had the same perception about Rolex, ok its not a Patek but my sub goes with just about any attire I choose, the build quality is great and it doesn't stand out as ostentatious. Regarding the brand I appreciate the sentiment of others can be negative but why let other people opinion shape what you do?
Thinking seriously about it, I don't think the image is a concern, more the used value of the watch. I like the fact a Rolex etc can be handed down in the family, and still have a monetary value attached. Looking at the current market that's unlikely to change, but is a Mont Blanc timepiece going to be worth anything in 15 years? Bit more of a gamble.

Still, the other watches I really like the style of are Tiffany, so MB isn't too bad hehe

PJ S

10,842 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
No.
Bar PP and Rolex, the rest of the industry is just like every other 2nd hand commodity – cheaper than the price it was purchased for.
Even PP wouldn't be as firm as the main Rolex models.