Rolex Explorer II
Author
Discussion

mr wiki

Original Poster:

373 posts

237 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
Whats your view on this?

I am sorely tempted to trade in my newish LV Sub for one.

I dont think I can justify having two Rolexes as they are too simular.

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
The previous case design is much more elegant than the new model IMHO





Slimmer lugs & no clumsy great crown guards.

Edited by andy tims on Monday 4th April 18:00

andy_s

19,857 posts

290 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
I'd agree; I think I prefer the older (i.e. outgoing) ones.

Mr E Driver

8,542 posts

215 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
I prefer this one

Maxf

8,444 posts

272 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
I definitely prefer the new one. I'd sooner a vintage orange hand over them both though!

Mr E Driver

8,542 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
like this one....

andy_s

19,857 posts

290 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
^ Well, that's the best of the bunch I think, but a bit out of my price range!


Mr E Driver

8,542 posts

215 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
^^^July '84 it only cost £560!

andy_s

19,857 posts

290 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Wasn't too popular in the day either apparently, probably why it's scarce I suppose.
That was about three times as much as my Seiko quartz that I bought at around that time for about £150 iirc. Suffice it to say mines not gone up in value quite so much... smile

(EFPoormaths)

LukeBird

17,170 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
My favourite is the SuperLuminova model with drilled lugs (as it is with many Rolexs) and a white face.
Lovely! thumbup

ETA I do like the maxi-dial on the new one, but the engraved rehaut & big case are big turn-offs for me!

mr wiki

Original Poster:

373 posts

237 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
After a few months of pondering, I'm going to put an order in on one of theses.

P7ULG

1,052 posts

314 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Mr E Driver said:
I prefer this one
Whats the writing around the inside of the case ?

Miguel Alvarez

5,185 posts

201 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Rolex - Rolex - Rolex etc etc.

Riff Raff

5,462 posts

226 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
I've had a few of the older style ones over the years (black and white faces), as well as GMT 2's. They are nice watches and wear quite well, if a bit small by current standards. Only thing I'd say about the Explorer compared to the GMT is that the bezel is quite prone to getting scuffed. Big scuffs mean a new bezel, whereas with the GMT you can just get the insert changed.

GMT's seem to fetch more though, which is odd as they are basically the same watch with different bezels.

I couldn't say whether I had a preference for either colour of face: I flip flopped between the two which is why I had so many of them over the years.

As far as the Rolex, Rolex, Rolex thing mentioned in a previous post, I can't say that it bothers me at all.

Riff Raff

5,462 posts

226 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Wurls said:
Riff Raff said:
As far as the Rolex, Rolex, Rolex thing mentioned in a previous post, I can't say that it bothers me at all.
Personally I think its awful. A little like having Calvin Klein written around the top of your pants. I don't suppose its was done as a result of a decision by the Rolex design department. More likely driven by the legal department as a challenge to the fakesters.
Well, maybe one of the advantages of getting old, and your eyesight going, is that you can't see the Rolex, Rolex, Rolex without your bins!

Seriously though, it's not really like the Calvin Klein on yoofs' Y fronts, or the crocodile on a Lacoste polo shirt. If someone is wearing a Rolex across the aisle from me on the train, I know it's a Rolex, but I can't see the Rolex, Rolex thing without getting up close and personal. Close enough and personal enough to get a smack! And it does have some advantages, as you can see whether the serial number on the watch corresponds with the papers - which you could only do before by taking the bracelet off.

P7ULG

1,052 posts

314 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Miguel Alvarez said:
Rolex - Rolex - Rolex etc etc.
Thanks

Once on the face and the logo on the clasp and winder is probably enough

bobbybee

889 posts

185 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
P7ULG said:
Thanks

Once on the face and the logo on the clasp and winder is probably enough
And don't forget the one on the crystal laser etched from the inside.
Personally the engraved rehaut doesn't bother me one way or the other.

I have a Sub-Date, YM I without, & an EXP II, Daytona both white face with engraving and it really isn't that obvious out in the world, but is when in the AD window, lighting I expect, and i'm sure it puts some people off.

Clivew

348 posts

206 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Mr E Driver said:
^^^July '84 it only cost £560!
This is a very interesting thread. My Explorer II was bought new in 1972 and cost £220! I have worn it nearly every day since. I love it.

andy_s

19,857 posts

290 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
It'd be great to see a few pics Clive, if you've got the time smile

RemainAllHoof

80,160 posts

313 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Yeah, this is the watch forum - you can't post stuff like that and not post up pictures!!