NASA Unveils New Space Launch System
NASA Unveils New Space Launch System
Author
Discussion

Caruso

Original Poster:

7,554 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
NASA has announced the configuration of it's new heavy lift launcher:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1491...

It has shuttle derived main stage with the same diameter as the shuttle external tank and with 5 SSMEs and 2 shuttle derived SRBs. The upper stage is an evolved Saturn 5 2nd/3rd stage engine - the J2-X. None of this comes as any great surprise. What did raise my eyebrows was that in the simulation vids, it's painted to look more like a Saturn than a Shuttle - black and white instead of orange. scratchchin

Sam the Mut

774 posts

205 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
It seems like nasa looked in the parts bin and cobbled a rocket together.

Edited by Sam the Mut on Thursday 15th September 20:11

jmorgan

36,010 posts

313 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Cannot help thinking the plot has been lost a long time ago. A trip to Mars I think is a step too far without going back to the Moon.

Caruso

Original Poster:

7,554 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Sam the Mut said:
It seems like nasa looked in the parts bin a cobbled a rocket together.
Pretty much, but that's the only way they're going to get back in the game before 2020. I just hope it hasn't got Morris Marina door handles!

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

188 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Seems sensible enough, NASA are trying to cut costs as much as possible and using tried and tested reliable technology. the Saturn V stages have been around for 50 years.

I think NASA are leaving all the new and innovative stuff to private companies and to let them start and run their own projects, rather than then tendering for NASA contracts as per the past.

tank slapper

7,949 posts

312 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
XJSsometimeSoon said:
Seems sensible enough, NASA are trying to cut costs as much as possible and using tried and tested reliable technology.
By using Shuttle parts? hehe

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

188 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
By using Shuttle parts? hehe
well yes... the launch stages were fairly reliable, apart from a small o ring issue in the 80s, which they sorted

I don't know why they don't just buy the rights to the energia launcher from the Russians. That could lift 100 tons into LEO.

tank slapper

7,949 posts

312 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Pride I expect, although they did buy the RD-180 to use on the Atlas V.

Caruso

Original Poster:

7,554 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
I would rather have seen fewer bigger engines on the 1st stage, because those SSMEs are expensive to make.

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

188 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Yeah pride must be it, shame really. If they had some proper technology sharing from the early 90s onwards then they might have a new generation of space shuttle using a lot of the innovations from Buran (which was kind of stolen and then improved from the space shuttle)

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Absolutely great news. NASA needs to establish what it intends to do over the next few years and this is the first step required.

The reason why the booster has a black and white pattern is because of the need to ascertain the "roll programme" manoeuver visually after launch. With the Shuttle, because of its asymetric configuration, the roll manoeuver was easy to discern. With a a more traditional rocket, checking that the roll has been carried out correctly is difficult unless you have an easy to identify visual pattern on the booster.
Obviously, all we are seeing at the mopment is an artist's impression. What it really will look like we won't know for a while.

Some interesting points though -

The entire liquid fueled part of the system uses liquid oxggen and liquid hydrogen, including the five engined first stage. The Saturn V first stage also had five engines but they burned the less efficient liquid oxygen-kerosene combination.

In its initial form, the new rocket will put 70 tonnes into low earth orbit. The Saturn V could put 100 tonnes into low earth orbit. However, the new booster will, when fully operational, be aiming to put 130 tonnes into low earth orbit.
The thrust rating of the first stage plus the two SRBs is 8.25 million pounds of thrust. This compares to 7.5 million pounds for teh Saturn V and just over 6 million pounds for the Shuttle. The upgraded version will have a thrust exceeding 9 million pounds.

These SRBs are 5 segment(rather than the Shuttle's 3 segment) so will burn for longer giving more thrust over a longer period. I presume they will also be fully recoverable and reusable. I doubt that the central core part of the rocket will be reuseable but it will be interesting to see where they go with that.

Edited by Eric Mc on Wednesday 14th September 22:46

Caruso

Original Poster:

7,554 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
I strongly suspect the colour scheme of the simulation was intended to evoke the Apollo era.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Caruso said:
I strongly suspect the colour scheme of the simulation was intended to evoke the Apollo era.
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too - which was the reason it was on the Saturn in the first place.

Caruso

Original Poster:

7,554 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too - which was the reason it was on the Saturn in the first place.
Yes, but interestingly all the imagery I've seen thus far have had an orange central 1st stage. You'd thing the SRBs would enable them to track the roll.

Simpo Two

92,673 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too
What was that?

Skylab was black and white too (I made a model of it for A-level Art!)

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Eric Mc said:
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too
What was that?

Skylab was black and white too (I made a model of it for A-level Art!)
External visual monitoring of the post lift off roll manoeuver. Most rockets do have some sort of marking on the side for this reason. Even the Shuttle had some roll measuring markings - mostly on the SRBs.

HarryW

16,013 posts

298 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Caruso said:
I strongly suspect the colour scheme of the simulation was intended to evoke the Apollo era.
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too - which was the reason it was on the Saturn in the first place.
O go on Eric I'll ask, what purpose was that.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
HarryW said:
Eric Mc said:
Caruso said:
I strongly suspect the colour scheme of the simulation was intended to evoke the Apollo era.
Possibly - but it has a definte purpose too - which was the reason it was on the Saturn in the first place.
O go on Eric I'll ask, what purpose was that.
See above.

Werner Von Braun's team came up with the idea in 1942



He used a variation on the Jupiter C/Redstone




And carried it through to the Saturn family


rich1231

17,340 posts

289 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
By using Shuttle parts? hehe
135 or so launches, 1 failed launch and 1 failed re entry. That is pretty bloody good if you ask me.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
It's not too bad and ranks pretty well with systems such as Delta. There are a few interesting differences between the way this system works compared to the Shuttle and the Saturn V -

The Space Shuttle Main Engines were designed to be reuseable up to 100 times. I expect that this version of the engine will not be resuseable which means they should be able to operate them at higher thrust settings

The new rocket is essentially a two stage rocket with five Shuttle engines on stage one and on stage 2 a developed version of the Saturn V top stage J2 engine, also liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen powered together with two more powerful SRB strap-ons. It is essentially a four stage rocket rather than a three stage rocket.
The Saturn V used five lquid oxygen-kerosene F1 engines on stage 1. Stage 2 had five J2 liquid oxygen-liquid hydrogen engins and stage three had one J2 engine.