Scarab 28ft
Author
Discussion

Sibby

Original Poster:

173 posts

223 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Hi all. Looking at buying the below but not sure on value. Can anyone give some advise??

Thanks smile

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Scarab-28ft-70-MPH-dream...

Huntsman

9,303 posts

279 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Get it bought!

Turbodiesel1690

1,958 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
BUY BUY BUY!

(No idea if its a good price)

MOTORVATOR

7,602 posts

276 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Bit more info required. Is it actually a Scarab 28 as they were more often than not single inboard?

I would guess it's not the 28 Excel or XLT and maybe the 30 sport.

Serial numbers of engines would be useful to find their age and if you are buying I would suggest having the compressions checked before handing over cash.

I very much doubt it has CE certification which may be a problem for insurers or not and check that it is VAT paid.

Value wise I would say about right assuming it's an original outboard version and not just standoff plates over the old transom although I would guess you could pick up a single big block version for the same money which may be a bit more desirable.

If you don't know exactly what you are looking at, then get someone who does to do it for you. If you're stuck I can put you in contact with the right sort of people in your neck of the woods.

Sibby

Original Poster:

173 posts

223 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Some good advice there, thanks! May well take you up on your contacts once I've got the extra info

danyeates

7,248 posts

251 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
I hope you've got enough ££££ to run it! Fuel through that thing will be ruinous!

I'd say it's a little overpriced given the engines (very little value now), but probably not far off.

MOTORVATOR

7,602 posts

276 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Confusing me a bit whether the engines are worth anything or not. They look like 3 litre offshores and are a counter rotating pair, but that doesn't compute with 1990 I don't think, so they could be a later engine than the boat.

Silly though to look at just the value of the engines as if you took them off you would just have to replace them with something else and that boat is hardly going to like a pair of Verados hanging off the back.

You're right about fuel though Dan I conservatively reckon they will get rid of fuel at a rate around 20-30 gallons per hour each when driven to the limit. Compare that to a big block using 35 gallons per hour at wot and similar levels of power out of a single engine and you can see the attraction of inboard.

Saddlebag

147 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Its got a "stabbin' cabin"....what more could you want?

EarlOfHazard

3,630 posts

187 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Saddlebag said:
Its got a "stabbin' cabin"....what more could you want?
rofl

danyeates

7,248 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
MOTORVATOR said:
Confusing me a bit whether the engines are worth anything or not. They look like 3 litre offshores and are a counter rotating pair, but that doesn't compute with 1990 I don't think, so they could be a later engine than the boat.

Silly though to look at just the value of the engines as if you took them off you would just have to replace them with something else and that boat is hardly going to like a pair of Verados hanging off the back.

You're right about fuel though Dan I conservatively reckon they will get rid of fuel at a rate around 20-30 gallons per hour each when driven to the limit. Compare that to a big block using 35 gallons per hour at wot and similar levels of power out of a single engine and you can see the attraction of inboard.
Yeah, I'm not a Mercury man but I think they're newer than 1990. I'm just wary that they won't last forever, and a matched pair would be very expensive to replace. You'd be lucky to find a good used matching pair.

20-30 gallons would be about right I'm sure. Also consider modern four stroke outboards, as the fuel economy on those is now very good. The Yamaha F200 - F250 do between 60 and 70 litres per hour flat out, probably half as much at the old 2 strokes.

Simpo Two

92,658 posts

294 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Meh, stick a Yanmar 39 in it... go all week on a tankful (and you'll be able to see where you started)

danyeates

7,248 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Meh, stick a Yanmar 39 in it... go all week on a tankful (and you'll be able to see where you started)
Lol, the complete opposite of a Q car then!

MOTORVATOR

7,602 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
danyeates said:
Simpo Two said:
Meh, stick a Yanmar 39 in it... go all week on a tankful (and you'll be able to see where you started)
Lol, the complete opposite of a Q car then!
Jesus Simpo, if you're going to hand out advice at least make it sensible. The obvious replacement for these engines are a pair of Seven Marine 557s. Yes they have just gone into production and would make this
a very useable runabout.

danyeates

7,248 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Yes they look interesting. I thought the Yamaha F350 was an amazing piece of engineering! Those Sevens are incredible.