Skill or Stupidity?
Author
Discussion

lloyd h

Original Poster:

1,559 posts

202 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Remarkably low, wouldn't like his chances if things went wrong..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElZlgZu0204&sns...

IforB

9,840 posts

258 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Having never, ever flown down river gullies, under powerlines, below treetop level or below wave top height as a sprog pilot, then I decline to comment!

lloyd h

Original Poster:

1,559 posts

202 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
IforB said:
Having never, ever flown down river gullies, under powerlines, below treetop level or below wave top height as a sprog pilot, then I decline to comment!
Likewise I'm not exactly qualified, still looks a tad dangerous though. Looks bloody great fun though! biggrin

IforB

9,840 posts

258 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
lloyd h said:
Likewise I'm not exactly qualified, still looks a tad dangerous though. Looks bloody great fun though! biggrin
Errr, I think I may have been a bit too subtle there. I have "never" done any of those things... *Wanders off whistling*

lloyd h

Original Poster:

1,559 posts

202 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
IforB said:
Errr, I think I may have been a bit too subtle there. I have "never" done any of those things... *Wanders off whistling*
Oh no I got them, should probably have worded my reply better though! Doh! banghead

Regiment

2,799 posts

188 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
The first thing I thought when watching that video was "stay on target", looks good fun. My biggest worry would be the landing gear scraping the water.

Siko

2,065 posts

271 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Perfectly fine as long as he just kills himself I guess. To answer your question and assuming he was just some random dude, equal amounts of both.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Looks cool, impressive video.

If he tries it everyday he'll be dead shortly.

Silent1

19,762 posts

264 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Regiment said:
The first thing I thought when watching that video was "stay on target", looks good fun. My biggest worry would be the landing gear scraping the water.
Skip to 2:10

Sifly

572 posts

207 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Skilled Flying, but madness.
Noise of engine startles flock of birds, plane hits birds, plane hits river / trees!

Game over..........

would be great fun until it suddenly went wrong though!irked

Regiment

2,799 posts

188 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Silent1 said:
Skip to 2:10
Didn't watch it all the way to there, think a bit of both being stupid and being a great pilot.

PeteS2k

57 posts

166 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all

jonnyb

2,590 posts

281 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
It's skill until it goes wrong, then It's stupidity. However, as long as he only kills himself, good luck to him.

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
No different to what the RAF boys did in WW2 with the low flying Mosquito's & Lancasters.


If he knows what he is doing then its ok. If he doesn't he will kill himself one day - hopefully without taking out any innocent passengers.

creampuff

6,511 posts

172 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
The wide angle lens makes the trees seem closer than they are. If you look at he shadow, then you see he has several metres clearance each side.

Skilled+stupid in equal measure.

yellowjack

18,407 posts

195 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Was I the only one wondering "What if someone equally skilful/stupid were to be flying along the river in the opposite direction?"


?????????

JBACON01

42 posts

176 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Rules of the air state you both turn right, nothing is mentioned about possibility of trees being in the way though.

Must admit it does look funsmile

Hilts

4,684 posts

311 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
No doubt someone who claims to be an ex-QFI will be along shortly to proclaim this flying as 'gash'.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Hilts said:
No doubt someone who claims to be an ex-QFI will be along shortly to proclaim this flying as 'gash'.
For a second there I thought I was back on prune.

Simpo Two

92,670 posts

294 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
fatboy69 said:
No different to what the RAF boys did in WW2 with the low flying Mosquito's & Lancasters
Though they had a good reason to fly low - risk of being detected by radar or worse was greater than risk of flying into ground, so it was the least risky option as opposed to matey above taking the most risky option.