No lanyard?
Author
Discussion

MOTORVATOR

Original Poster:

7,602 posts

276 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-224210...

Quite tragic especially considering the ages. I suspect we'll see a bit of fallout from this one after maib.

mph1977

12,467 posts

197 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
MOTORVATOR said:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-224210...

Quite tragic especially considering the ages. I suspect we'll see a bit of fallout from this one after maib.
sounds like the kill cord wasn't be used properly as if you exit the vessel with one properly used it should stop the engine ' the going round in circles ' report adds weight tothe no lanyard / kill cord use angle.


paintman

7,860 posts

219 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Thought much the same myself. All too common to see cords just dangling from the switch.
Very sad & IF that is the case entirely avoidable.
See what the MAIB result is.

Simpo Two

92,670 posts

294 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
The coastguard jumping in would have been interesting - do they practice that kind of thing?



"There appears to have been some interaction between the boat and the group of people in the water..." is very strange wording!

Marcellus

7,204 posts

248 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
The coastguard jumping in would have been interesting - do they practice that kind of thing?
Probably not practice, but anyone around power boats a lot wouldn't find it too difficult to do, we're frequently hoping between boats of various sizes at various speeds.

As for the accident; obviously massive sympathy to the families but completely avoidable............ If the engine is on then so should the kill cord be.

Sometimes it might be a pita (dropping anchors, moving marks, sorting out boats, coaching etc etc etc) but it's all to easy to go overboard at slow as well as high speeds and if you do then it's far better to have the engine cut than be around a mincer under water.

croyde

26,298 posts

259 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Turns out my ex-wife knows the family, they are local to us in SW London frown

The lanyard thing is a puzzle to me for if the driver fell out and thus killed the engine, how would any passengers be able to control the boat with a dead engine, say to turn it around to pick the driver up?

hyperblue

2,907 posts

209 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
croyde said:
The lanyard thing is a puzzle to me for if the driver fell out and thus killed the engine, how would any passengers be able to control the boat with a dead engine, say to turn it around to pick the driver up?
If the driver's fallen out and killed the engine, the boat won't be too far away. You'd usually carry a spare kill cord on the boat in case you lose it anyway.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
croyde said:
The lanyard thing is a puzzle to me for if the driver fell out and thus killed the engine, how would any passengers be able to control the boat with a dead engine, say to turn it around to pick the driver up?
It's not going far without power.

Terrible story this, sympathies to all those involved. Massive respect to the chap who hopped on and stopped it.

Marcellus

7,204 posts

248 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
croyde said:
The lanyard thing is a puzzle to me for if the driver fell out and thus killed the engine, how would any passengers be able to control the boat with a dead engine, say to turn it around to pick the driver up?
If the helm falls out and they're wearing the kill cord correctly then by the time they've hit the water the engines are off, so simply they can swim back to the boat and climb back in.

If they have flown too far from the boat that an MOB is required then anyone competant to do it would know how to circumvent the kill cord/switch....that is if they've not got all the correct kit in the boat which should include a spare kill cord.

croyde

26,298 posts

259 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Thanks. Makes a lot of sense.

MOTORVATOR

Original Poster:

7,602 posts

276 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all

ClaphamGT3

12,223 posts

272 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Awful, awful way to go, how appalling for the whole family.

I have to say, those big RIBs scare the bejesus out of me; never like putting the children in them

Beyond Rational

3,544 posts

244 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
Just seen more on the Beeb news.
Terrible accident, one hell of a nice Rib, but the footage showed it not circling at a high speed - I am surprised the news stated that it circled and hit them a few times.

Unless incapacitated, I would assume you could move out of the way.

Await the inquisition of licensing etc of operators of pleasure craft
It has been suggested that the boat was slowed with a rope in the propeller, so the speed in the video might not be the same when the accident occurred. The boat may also have driven in tighter circles, slowing it further.

As for getting out of the way, how long to do you have to judge the path of the boat after regaining your bearings and checking everyone is ok? How fast can an 8 year old swim?

prand

6,244 posts

225 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
6 people in the water. Parents and children aged 4 (boy), 8, 10, 12 (girls).

Father and youngest daughter died. Mother and youngest boy severely injured (talk of potential removal of limbs), the elder two girls less so.

Witnesses report the boat took a sharp turn which threw all the occupants into the water. It seems it was 15 mins or so before the boat was brought under control by a passing boat trying to slow the boat by snagging the propeller then jumping aboard.

Awful, but if this was attributed to the kill switch, then this need not have happened. The conditions are reported as being calm, so what was the manoevre that threw everyone overboard? An 8 metre 300hp RIB needs some respect and controlling. Terrible for all involved frown

Simpo Two

92,670 posts

294 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Sooo... pondering sequence... did they rescue the people from the water first (risking being hit by the runaway boat), or tame the runaway first (risking hitting the people in the water with two boats!) then rescue them? Neither seems ideal.



I was plodding up my ditch today. And the nice man at the lock made sure I had a licence (not that it confers any boat-handling skills, merely indicates that you paid some money).

prand

6,244 posts

225 months

Monday 6th May 2013
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Sooo... pondering sequence... did they rescue the people from the water first (risking being hit by the runaway boat), or tame the runaway first (risking hitting the people in the water with two boats!) then rescue them? Neither seems ideal.



I was plodding up my ditch today. And the nice man at the lock made sure I had a licence (not that it confers any boat-handling skills, merely indicates that you paid some money).
I believe they stopped the runaway boat first.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 7th May 2013
quotequote all
A lot of speculation in here but, until the MAIB have fully investigated that's all it is.,

I've had high powered RIBs and when they are at high speed they need to be respected - especially doing tight turns. They can get very twitchy.

Kill switch may or may not have been attached to the person at the helm.

A terrible tragedy for a family enjoying a bank holiday weekend.

Ari

19,814 posts

244 months

Tuesday 7th May 2013
quotequote all
croyde said:
Turns out my ex-wife knows the family, they are local to us in SW London frown

The lanyard thing is a puzzle to me for if the driver fell out and thus killed the engine, how would any passengers be able to control the boat with a dead engine, say to turn it around to pick the driver up?
Kill cord normally loops over an encapsulated toggle switch. Put loop over, push switch up. Kill corp gets pulled, it pulls the toggle switch down, cuts engine. Nothing stopping someone clicking the toggle switch back up and restarting engine if kill cord wearer gone overboard.

Keep thinking about this accident. Must have gone from a wonderful day out with family to a scene from a horror movie, last thing that bloke would have seen is the boat hitting his family and then circling toward him. Horrific.

Marcellus

7,204 posts

248 months

Tuesday 7th May 2013
quotequote all
Ari said:
Kill cord normally loops over an encapsulated toggle switch. Put loop over, push switch up. Kill corp gets pulled, it pulls the toggle switch down, cuts engine. Nothing stopping someone clicking the toggle switch back up and restarting engine if kill cord wearer gone overboard.
All of ours are sprung loaded so you can't toggle back on you would have to wedge it, in which case you may as well use the correct cord.

MOTORVATOR

Original Poster:

7,602 posts

276 months

Tuesday 7th May 2013
quotequote all
garyhun said:
A lot of speculation in here but, until the MAIB have fully investigated that's all it is.,

I've had high powered RIBs and when they are at high speed they need to be respected - especially doing tight turns. They can get very twitchy.

Kill switch may or may not have been attached to the person at the helm.

A terrible tragedy for a family enjoying a bank holiday weekend.
Agreed on the investigation and it would be wrong to speculate on driver error or failure of a part as an initial cause or I suppose even the failure of the kill cord to stop the boat.

One thing with the above though is that it matters not whether a boat is a rib, hard boat, bowrider or whatever, they all have the same capacity to bite in a tight turn as the planing running surfaces are largely the same. Neither does it need 300hp on an 8m boat to do it. Common misconception sometimes by those who favour ribs as being inherently safe.