USAF C17 lands at the wrong (and much smaller) airport!
USAF C17 lands at the wrong (and much smaller) airport!
Author
Discussion

High flier

Original Poster:

1,089 posts

206 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
Oops: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHMhClzfoi8

It did get out without pretty comfortably though!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=805M1svwp_8

Edited by High flier on Monday 8th July 20:17

Brother D

4,419 posts

205 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
Chuff me. That's some seriously impressive braking action.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
Feck all that. Go chase the C17 whale rescue landing....

MartG

22,755 posts

233 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Loads of spare space when getting off, despite what the reporters were saying after it landed - unsurprising for a military transport designed with STOL performance in mind

Riff Raff

5,462 posts

224 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
MartG said:
Loads of spare space when getting off, despite what the reporters were saying after it landed - unsurprising for a military transport designed with STOL performance in mind
I think I read the other day that it wasn't so much the length of the runway that was the main issue, but the weight of a laden C17 was more than the runway was designed to take.

Could be wrong though.

LotusMartin

1,127 posts

181 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Holy 'Year Old' News thread resurrection - www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=1176741

High flier

Original Poster:

1,089 posts

206 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
LotusMartin said:
Holy 'Year Old' News thread resurrection - www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=1176741
Sorry for not living on PH's and seeing it last year.......

High flier

Original Poster:

1,089 posts

206 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Riff Raff said:
I think I read the other day that it wasn't so much the length of the runway that was the main issue, but the weight of a laden C17 was more than the runway was designed to take.

Could be wrong though.
Yep, that was the main issue.