Ex-CIA man reckons no planes hit the twin towers
Ex-CIA man reckons no planes hit the twin towers
Author
Discussion

Otispunkmeyer

Original Poster:

13,759 posts

184 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-...

To be honest, I just came across this, I'm not even sure if its reputable. But if it is.... erm did he not see the same videos everyone else did?

The headline is slightly misleading mind, because what he actually says is that a 767 of the type described didn't crash into the towers. He says a 767 wouldn't crash like those ones did. Apparently they would "telescope" on impact and large portions of the place would simply stop dead and fall to the ground. At that point you do get the good old image of Wiley Coyote running head long into a rock whilst trying to catch the road runner!

But, is there anything legit in what he is saying?

Seti

1,957 posts

233 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
No. Nothing legit whatsoever.

Otispunkmeyer

Original Poster:

13,759 posts

184 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
so he's been watching too many Looney Tunes...

Mermaid

21,492 posts

200 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all

Many of us need to go to specsavers if what he says is true.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

313 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Mr Lear has presented some rather, er, odd idea's in the last few years. Both on this and many other topics. Mostly barking.

Jos Notstoppen

510 posts

170 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Well he is sort of correct. If they had hit a solid concrete wall.

But, before the planes hit concrete they went
through plate glass, then concrete thinnish coloumns and
so the aircraft metal tore around them.

Sad but true

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

215 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
"it takes skill to use the guidance systems"

well it doesnt take that much skill to look out of the window for the huge towers though does it.

if he was anything to do with the c.i.a then their psyche evaluations need reviewing.

or maybe he was flying u2's and was suffering from all those compression cycles, who knows.

what we do know is that it was aircraft that hit the towers, unless it was all done in the same nevada soundstage where they filmed the moon landings. smile


IanMorewood

4,309 posts

277 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
I know tv can be fixed but I recall quite clearly seeing the second plane impact in front of a fair old chunk of the media and that can't be fixed.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
The planes wouldn't crash like that,
the buildings wouldn't fall like that,

same old crap as before, if he ever was in the CIA, you can see why he's ex CIA.

Simpo Two

92,670 posts

294 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
So what did we all see - mass hallucination? And what did bring down the towers, if not the airliners?

He makes David Icke seem sane.

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

215 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
maybe "fly for the C.I.A" means he was subject to too many of their LSD experiments back in the day.

wildcat45

8,159 posts

218 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all

OK so Mr Learjet, what happened? How did the towners fall down and how was everyone killed?


Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
Ex-CIA man says crazy stuff to bring other crazies out of the woodwork onto internet chat forums, to distract them from...(insert today's dodgy news)

jmorgan

36,010 posts

313 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
OK so Mr Learjet, what happened? How did the towners fall down and how was everyone killed?
If you really want to find out, there is a forum, much like Icke, scrape your brain out first or the stupid will burn it. The forum of old seems to have disappeared and a new one arrived. Either way and insight to some peoples beliefs is illuminating.

wildcat45

8,159 posts

218 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all

Just so odd how you can claim something like that didn't happen the way it did.

Otispunkmeyer

Original Poster:

13,759 posts

184 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
The best thing i thought was that its not just an off the cuff claim, he's put in a affidavit!

wildcat45

8,159 posts

218 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all

I know its all balls, but I do love a good conspiracy theory. The wilder the better especially when they are happy to swear to it as you say.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
Perhaps we should put him in a cannon and fire him at a wall and see if he "stops dead" The result would be very similar to what actually happens when 100Tonne of plane, doing >400mph hits several hundred thousands tonnes of steel and concrete. The energy has to go somewhere, and in fact, what happens is the plane pretty much vapourises. Witness the Phantom test into the "nuclear protection wall" (google it if you haven't see it)!

Unfortunately, people (idiots generally) apply things they see around them, like say cars crashing into each other at 40mph and say, well, that's what "should" happen when a plan flies into a building, it shoudl just crumple up a bit. The key being, they are idiots........

GadgeS3C

4,727 posts

193 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
I watched the footage of the Reno Mustang crash a couple of years ago. The plane completely disintegrated on impact with the ground. There didn't appear to be any large parts remaining. If you look it up it be aware that several people were killed.

I'd imaging that quite a lot of the Twin Towers planes embedded themselves into the building.

Fascinating but quite scary what happens in high speed impacts.

jshell

12,056 posts

234 months

Saturday 8th March 2014
quotequote all
This must have been faked too: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315518/Pl...

Pretty good those guys - setting up for 11 years after!