Bugatti 100P - good news...
Author
Discussion

bumblebee

Original Poster:

557 posts

256 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Scotty Wilson has made the first hop in his reproduction Bugatti 100P.

Took it easy - lifting off 3000' along a 13,500' runway near Tulsa. Up to 100' and back down gently, - but a brake pedal failure during roll-out resulted in a low speed runway excursion and nose-over on soft ground. Just minor damage to props and spinner.
Nothing that can't be fixed - but thankfully and most importantly no damage to Scotty himself....

Having had the pleasure of meeting Scotty and seeing the aeroplane while it was being built, I'm really pleased to see it get airborne successfully and safely. A little bit of aviation history made yesterday afternoon.

biggrin

https://www.facebook.com/TheBugatti100pProject


Boatbuoy

1,975 posts

191 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Great news (the flying bit, not the crashing!).

I saw the original at the Experimental Aircraft Musuem in Oshkosh last summer. It's a fabulous looking machine (well, it is a Bugatti!) but it's absolutely tiny, and the idea of propshafts hugging your hips puts the shivers down my spine!

dukeboy749r

3,753 posts

239 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
I know the chap who has done the gearbox, amongst other bits, a fantastic effort from all concerned

ecsrobin

18,643 posts

194 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
I know the chap who has done the gearbox, amongst other bits, a fantastic effort from all concerned
Whenever I show people about this project I make sure I show them the gearbox images, it's a work of art!!

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 21st August 2015
quotequote all
Great seeing it finally become airborne. Such a beautiful aircraft.

Condi

20,267 posts

200 months

Friday 21st August 2015
quotequote all
Just a real shame it wont do what the original was supposed to. Its a work of art, no doubt, but the performance and engineering isnt the same.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
dukeboy749r said:
I know the chap who has done the gearbox, amongst other bits, a fantastic effort from all concerned
Whenever I show people about this project I make sure I show them the gearbox images, it's a work of art!!
I really don't fancy sitting sandwiched between two propeller shafts mind!

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Condi said:
Just a real shame it wont do what the original was supposed to. Its a work of art, no doubt, but the performance and engineering isnt the same.
Sure but without plans or original engines it was always going to be thus. It's not really a restoration but it's still an amazing project.

I must admit, I was a bit disappointed to hear the engines,

lufbramatt

5,663 posts

163 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
I know the chap who has done the gearbox, amongst other bits, a fantastic effort from all concerned
Seems a lot of people know the gearbox guy- he's a "friend of a friend", I was aware he had flown over last week as they were going to attempt to fly it :-) stunning project, hope the damage is easily fixed and just a minor set back.

callmedave

2,686 posts

174 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Just watched a few videos on popsci, great effort by all involved in getting this project off the ground (pun intended)

The crash is very minor and merely addresses an issue they can easily put right.

Looking forward to seeing this do more airtime.

bumblebee

Original Poster:

557 posts

256 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
I really don't fancy sitting sandwiched between two propeller shafts mind!


Need to make sure your shoelaces are done up properly!

Condi

20,267 posts

200 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
They must be covering those UJs, surely?! We have to - by law - have ours covered at work and would never think of getting that close to one. I've got a mate who lost his arm in an unguarded PTO - not pretty.

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Not to mention those two tinplate "guards" will do precisely nothing if one of those high speed steel shafts gets loose.......... yikes

dr_gn

16,924 posts

213 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Didn't realise it was an automatic.

bumblebee

Original Poster:

557 posts

256 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all


This and the previous pic both taken just over 18 months ago during the build, just before New Year 2014.
I'm pretty sure the UJs wouldn't have been left unsheathed. On the basis that nothing short of armour plate would protect from a driveshaft failure - I don't think the thickness of the sheathing makes much difference at all....it just needs to be there and be as lightweight as possible.

With the exception of the gearbox, props, engines and some beautifully milled and cast parts of the undercarriage the airframe has been built by Scotty with his own bare hands.