Rail Gauge
Author
Discussion

Willy Nilly

Original Poster:

12,511 posts

196 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
There was talk about building a new railway across the Pennines or something yesterday. If they did, why not make the tracks wider, say twice the width, to make the trains bigger and thus more capacious?

pherlopolus

2,189 posts

187 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Broad gauge was the betamax of rail, probably the slightly better solution but didn't quite win the popular vote...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broad_gauge

The_Burg

4,853 posts

243 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
Cost. Railways are a standard guage. The Brunel did it with his railways many, many years ago. If we had stuck with it where would we be now? As in many things the best doesn't always win. VHS v Betamax, Vinyl v MP3. Petrol v Diesel.

rs1952

5,247 posts

288 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
There is also the matter of compatibility. Such trains would only be able to operate on that line an that line only, unless of course they were designed to allow automatic changes of gauge, and that again would increase costs.

A bit of info here on how gauge changes take place between France and Spain: http://egtre.info/wiki/Border_Crossings:_France_-_...

ecsrobin

18,642 posts

194 months

Thursday 17th March 2016
quotequote all
They change axles on the trains Siberian express. Takes an hour or 2 I believe

Jader1973

5,111 posts

229 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Come to Australia - they have broad, standard, and narrow.

Complete mess biggrin

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Blame the Irish.

woodypup59

700 posts

181 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Blame the Irish.
No, blame a horse's arse.

That set the std gauge at 4' 8 1/2".

Simpo Two

92,663 posts

294 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all

jamiebae

6,245 posts

240 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
We have standard and narrow here in Switzerland and it's really annoying, normal trains run in most places but to get up into the mountains you have to change trains. That means you can't take a direct train from Zürich to Klosters, you get an express to Landquart and then switch onto a smaller (and much, much slower) metre gauge train which takes you to Davos and Klosters.

The bit in red on the map takes less time than the little bit in blue at the end!


Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
woodypup59 said:
Eric Mc said:
Blame the Irish.
No, blame a horse's arse.

That set the std gauge at 4' 8 1/2".
I was referring to the Australian issue.

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

161 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
If the wheels are outside the carriages/wagons rather than underneath then Brunel's gauge = double deck passenger coaches and transportation of bigger containers.

Tango13

10,047 posts

205 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Quite a few years back the Design Museum put on an exhibition of Brunels' work that also evaluated his designs with the benefit of hindsight.

Looking back at his broad gauge with over a hundred years of experience the historians concluded that the plus points were balanced out by the negatives almost equally.

Dogwatch

6,381 posts

251 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
From an engineering point of view Brunel was probably correct but I can't help thinking that if he had gone for, say, 5'6" gauge he might. just. possibly. maybe. have made more of an impact but 4'8" to 8' was just too much of a jump.

I saw a 12 coach Class 377 empty stock working pull up on the opposite platform yesterday. Quite a sight, but on 8' gauge in the rush hour the disembarking passengers would have swamped the station.

Tango13

10,047 posts

205 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
Dogwatch said:
From an engineering point of view Brunel was probably correct but I can't help thinking that if he had gone for, say, 5'6" gauge he might. just. possibly. maybe. have made more of an impact but 4'8" to 8' was just too much of a jump.

I saw a 12 coach Class 377 empty stock working pull up on the opposite platform yesterday. Quite a sight, but on 8' gauge in the rush hour the disembarking passengers would have swamped the station.
yes

Fully agree, the infrastructure required for the broad gauge was listed as one of the down sides, the extra land required for both the track, stations, train workshops etc was significantly higher.

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

161 months

Sunday 20th March 2016
quotequote all
Who would have believed that there was a "Broad Gauge Society" ?

http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/history/bg_what_is.ht...


matchmaker

9,033 posts

229 months

Sunday 20th March 2016
quotequote all
Dogwatch said:
From an engineering point of view Brunel was probably correct but I can't help thinking that if he had gone for, say, 5'6" gauge he might. just. possibly. maybe. have made more of an impact but 4'8" to 8' was just too much of a jump.

I saw a 12 coach Class 377 empty stock working pull up on the opposite platform yesterday. Quite a sight, but on 8' gauge in the rush hour the disembarking passengers would have swamped the station.
Brunel's broad gauge was 7'.

Yertis

19,707 posts

295 months

Monday 21st March 2016
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Brunel's broad gauge was 7'.
Actually 7'1/4". Along the cutting near where I live there's still a load of Brunel's rail in use, as fenceposts.

rs1952

5,247 posts

288 months

Monday 21st March 2016
quotequote all
Yertis said:
matchmaker said:
Brunel's broad gauge was 7'.
Actually 7'1/4". Along the cutting near where I live there's still a load of Brunel's rail in use, as fenceposts.
It's all over the place in the south west. Here's a bit near me, on the former Chippenham to Calne branch that is now a footpath/ cycle track



Stedman

7,456 posts

221 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2016
quotequote all
4 foot 8 is just fine thank you!

Dogwatch said:
I saw a 12 coach Class 377 empty stock working pull up on the opposite platform yesterday. Quite a sight, but on 8' gauge in the rush hour the disembarking passengers would have swamped the station.
God those 12 cars are slow!