Car vs Plane...
Author
Discussion

Puggit

Original Poster:

49,788 posts

277 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2016
quotequote all
FlightRadar24 said:
Sent to us by a user: photos of a car vs. aircraft accident last night at Chicago-ORD. Car didn’t yield to aircraft on maintenance taxiway.




https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/801086199...


djc206

13,559 posts

154 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2016
quotequote all
Christ that's going to be expensive

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2016
quotequote all
That engine seems awfully close to the ground. What happens when a wing dips on landing?

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2016
quotequote all
It scrapes the ground smile

The new versions of the 737 like the 800 have fairly small clearance between the bottom of the cowling and the ground -



The previous generation )300/400/500) had a flattened cowl -




And, of course, the original 100 and 200s had much smaller engines -



wolfracesonic

9,177 posts

156 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2016
quotequote all
That should buff out with some T-Cut and polish; the cars a write off thoughfrown

Talksteer

5,701 posts

262 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
That engine seems awfully close to the ground. What happens when a wing dips on landing?
Have look at where the engine is in relation to the undercarriage. The undercarriage is rearward of the engine and the plane lands with a nose up attitude.

The angle that the plane would have to tilt at to strike the engine is pretty extreme.

David87

7,018 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
I think the A320neo must win the award for the closest engine to the ground.

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
Have look at where the engine is in relation to the undercarriage. The undercarriage is rearward of the engine and the plane lands with a nose up attitude.
Fair point, I was only thinking of a front 2D view.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Talksteer said:
Have look at where the engine is in relation to the undercarriage. The undercarriage is rearward of the engine and the plane lands with a nose up attitude.
Fair point, I was only thinking of a front 2D view.
You'd usually hit the wingtip on a B737 or A320 before the engine pod.




4 engines actually make a pod strike more likely.



Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 23 November 22:30

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
Well they could have titanium skid plates underneath...

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

215 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2016
quotequote all
Oops.