WW2 RAF roundels
Author
Discussion

texaxile

Original Poster:

3,752 posts

179 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
Read an interesting snippet in todays Times about the RAF and RAAF dropping the Red out of the roundel in the Far East Campaigns during WW2 to stop misidentification. Also, it claimed that the American Spitfires and also some British aircraft were marked with a US "Star" and a Union Jack on the tail.

I would ask then if it was possible that a British Aircraft, belonging to a British Unit would be showing what appeared to be US markings?. What was the reason behind this, if so?.

This is something I've never considered or even seen before and find it fascinating.

ninja-lewis

5,407 posts

219 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
During Operation Torch, British roundels were replaced with the US star roundel. The main reasons were:

1. Reduce risk of friendly fire as our roundel was very similar to Vichy French Air Force's.
2. It was thought that the French might not fire on 'US' aircraft but certainly would on British aircraft as vengeance for Mers el-Kebir and other attacks on Vichy forces.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
All true - apart from the Union Jack on the tail. As far as I know, tail markings, if carried, generally consisted of the normal red white and blue fin flash - or white and blue.

In the far east the red was deleted from the RAF and Australian markings because there was fear that a red dot in the roundel might cause confusion as the Japanese marking (the Honimaru) was a red disk.

This is a model I built of an Australian Spitfire Mk VIII showing the modified roundels -




The Americans also had to modify their markings. Pre the end of 1941, US markings also had a red dot in the centre

Here's a Wildcat model I also built depicting a US Navy machine in mid 1941 colours-



By 1942 the aircraft were camouflaged and the red centres removed -



In 1942, the British and the Americans took part in the first large scale combined operation of the war, Operation Torch, the landings in North Africa. To ensure American anti-Aircraft gunners didn't fire on British aircraft they didn't recognise, it was decided that the British aircraft taking part would carry American style roundels -







Edited by Eric Mc on Saturday 18th March 22:23

Simpo Two

92,660 posts

294 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
All true - apart from the Union Jack on the tail.
Union flag; the jack is what it flies from nerd

Steve_D

13,801 posts

287 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Eric Mc said:
All true - apart from the Union Jack on the tail.
Union flag; the jack is what it flies from nerd
Quote
It is often stated that the Union Flag should only be described as the Union Jack when flown in the bows of a warship, but this is a relatively recent idea. From early in its life the Admiralty itself frequently referred to the flag as the Union Jack, whatever its use, and in 1902 an Admiralty Circular announced that Their Lordships had decided that either name could be used officially. Such use was given Parliamentary approval in 1908 when it was stated that “the Union Jack should be regarded as the National flag”.

Cdr Bruce Nicolls OBE RN (Retd)

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Let's not divert the thread - which is really about roundel styles.

Later in the War,the RAF roundel was changed again to make it even less likely to be confused with the Japanese insignia -





Edited by Eric Mc on Sunday 19th March 10:39

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

255 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
One of the BBMF Hurricanes is in the '44 SE Asia Command scheme:

http://www.raf.mod.uk/bbmf/theaircraft/hurricanepz...

texaxile

Original Poster:

3,752 posts

179 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Thanks for all the replies and clarification - it really is a fascinating subject (to me anyway!). Eric those models are really impressive, thanks for sharing.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
You learn an awful lot about colours and marking by building models.

texaxile

Original Poster:

3,752 posts

179 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Hi Eric
I've made 2 airfix 1/72 models recently (hurricane and a Messerschmitt 109), purely as an experiment and to see if my abilities were up to the task. I confess also to having had a look in the "scale model" subforum and have been really blown away by the quality and hard work people put into them.

Are Airfix / Revell 1/72 models a good starting point, also, do you know of a reliable and accurate resource which has different paint patterns / roundels for the different theatres? (I take it Ebay is a good place to obtain different roundels?).

I know I'm slighty veering off topic but it is kind of in the same ball park!.

CanAm

13,874 posts

301 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
texaxile said:
Hi Eric
I've made 2 airfix 1/72 models recently (hurricane and a Messerschmitt 109), purely as an experiment and to see if my abilities were up to the task. I confess also to having had a look in the "scale model" subforum and have been really blown away by the quality and hard work people put into them.

Are Airfix / Revell 1/72 models a good starting point, also, do you know of a reliable and accurate resource which has different paint patterns / roundels for the different theatres? (I take it Ebay is a good place to obtain different roundels?).

I know I'm slighty veering off topic but it is kind of in the same ball park!.
I'll let Eric reply on the kits as I don't build 1/72 aircraft, but recent Airfix kits in general have improved dramatically.
www.hannants.co.uk is a great source for decals (and kits) with a good Search system.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Airfix was revived in 2006 when they were bought by Hornby. Most of the kits they've produced since then have been extremely buildable - if a bit fiddly here and there.

Pre-2006 it's a mixed bag. They had a kind of a golden period from about 1974 to 1980 but even those kits would not be up to modern standards.

Revell are broadly similar - with their "modern" period beginning in the mid 1990s with any kits from that period on being pretty acceptable.

Many mainstream kit manufacturers have long histories dating back to the early 1950s and some kits from these earlier periods are still in production - so you do need to do your homework. I find this website pretty good if you want to trace a models provenance -

https://www.scalemates.com/

As for decals, there are as many specialist decal manufacturers as there are kit manufacturers. I often use decals from these specialist companies rather than from the kit. Modern kit decals are usually pretty good but if you have bought an old kit the decals may not be that good. I sometimes use specialist decals just to produce something different.


Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Let's not divert the thread - which is about roundel styles.

My favourite is the BOB style with big white circles and a big yellow surrounding circle. Not the most tactical, but the best looking.




davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
I like the faded roundels that went with anti-flash white, because it seems futuristic. I wonder if things from the 1960s will always seem futuristic?


yellowjack

18,403 posts

195 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
So was the 'no red' roundel with added bars yet another confusion-avoidance device?

Website credit... https://www.flyinglegends.com/aircraft/supermarine...


I thought I'd read somewhere, in the deep and distant past, that taking out the red wasn't always enough to avoid confusion with the Japanese, because shape is more important than colour in recognition terms. The external shape of the US star is circular, so the Americans, and the British (FAA at least) in the Pacific Theatre added bars to redefine the shape of their aircraft markings, thereby making them far more recognisable at distance...