Airlander 10 "breaks in two"
Airlander 10 "breaks in two"
Author
Discussion

Magog

Original Poster:

2,653 posts

213 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
This is being reported by the BBC. Was moored and only one minor injury thankfully. From the photo it looks pretty bad, this project seems to have had a run of bad luck. Hopefully not the end of the road for them, but you have to wonder.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-he...

anonymous-user

78 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
Pretty much 100 years ago most people realised airships were pretty flawed devices and it looks like that hasn't changed!

MitchT

17,089 posts

233 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
This project is becoming a bit of a let down.

cerbfan

1,198 posts

251 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
I imagine the owners are feeling deflated.

Tango13

9,866 posts

200 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
I saw it flying about yesterday afternoon near Shuttleworth, it seemed to be trimmed a bit 'nose down'

tonyvid

9,889 posts

267 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
From the BBC story it seems to have broken free from the mooring and auto-deflated. That will be a heck of a job to move like that. I wonder why it broke free as it's been pretty flat calm the last few days...

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

303 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all


Meh, a bicycle pump will fix that.


anonymous-user

78 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
Silly question, does it have any kind of backbone structure? Is it just a case of pumping it back up again, or is something actually broken inside??

Willhire89

1,446 posts

229 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
Airlander - you've let yourself down and the whole future of this project down laugh

ShampooEfficient

4,278 posts

235 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
These puns have gone down like a lead balloon...

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Saturday 18th November 2017
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
I saw it flying about yesterday afternoon near Shuttleworth, it seemed to be trimmed a bit 'nose down'
I saw it too. About 4:20-4:25. Flying low just heading into Cardington as the sun was setting.

AER

1,145 posts

294 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
a few tens, or perhaps hundreds, of thousand pounds worth of He disappeared into the universe!

Eric Mc

124,944 posts

289 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
That's it I think.

Structural problems were always the weak link in airship design.

rog007

5,821 posts

248 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
I’ve done most things in life you’d call adventurous, but never been up in a hot air balloon...I rest my case.

Mr MXT

7,774 posts

307 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Silly question, does it have any kind of backbone structure? Is it just a case of pumping it back up again, or is something actually broken inside??
No backbone, the rigidity comes from the internal pressure.

TheRainMaker

7,707 posts

266 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
From reading the linked article, it sounds like someone pressed some sort of panic button to stop the thing flying away on it’s own, so I guess they can can refill it and fix any bent bits (must have known to be a problem as the system was it place).

I guess next steps would be, add more bits of string to keep the thing on the ground hehe




Edited by TheRainMaker on Sunday 19th November 10:05

Yipper

5,964 posts

114 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
Can't believe they're wasting money and time on that thing.

V41LEY

3,003 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
This photo surely puts the nail in the coffin balloon for this project. I'll take my chances on RyanAir !

hammo19

7,176 posts

220 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
I’m struggling to see the relevance of this project in today’s technological climate.

otherman

2,261 posts

189 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
As usual with BBC headlines and inverted commas,

Airlander 'breaks in two'

really means

Airlander doesn't break in two.