Name the plane
Author
Discussion

78Pace

Original Poster:

50 posts

188 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all


Hi all - in doing some family history research I've come across this photograph of a plane which I don't recognise and, so far, can't find with Google either. It relates to my grandfather who served in the Royal Flying Corps in WW1 and I am told that the photo may have been taken in France. Hoping that you can help me solve this puzzle please!

tight5

2,747 posts

183 months

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Lol. A hundred years ago a now defunct manufacturer built 3 aircraft, and it wasn’t a success. Fifteen minutes after a plea for help identifying it from an old photo, someone gives the answer. PistonHeads occasionally warms the cockles smile

CobolMan

1,429 posts

231 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all

CanAm

13,078 posts

296 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
You know that old saying that "If it looks right..." eek

Eric Mc

124,944 posts

289 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
If a company was to win a prize for the most number of ugly designs, I would nominate Blackburn - especially its biplanes.

78Pace

Original Poster:

50 posts

188 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Thanks everyone for upholding the reputation of the PH collective in 2019 - 5 answers within the first couple of hours! I have no idea what my grandfather had to do with this plane, so that'll be another avenue to look into. The links you have posted contain a mine of information - thank you again. smile

CanAm

13,078 posts

296 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
If a company was to win a prize for the most number of ugly designs, I would nominate Blackburn - especially its biplanes.
The monoplanes weren't a lot better. But they finally did ok with the Buccaneer.

Eric Mc

124,944 posts

289 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
What went wrong with the Buccaneer - it's quite an attractive design (and excellent in its role). It took them 50 years to get it right.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
What went wrong with the Buccaneer - it's quite an attractive design (and excellent in its role). It took them 50 years to get it right.
Really? What makes you say that? Bear in mind it was in service for just over 30 years, and not one modern military aircraft has been introduced in what turns out to be a final and successful state.

The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

101 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
The monoplanes weren't a lot better. But they finally did ok with the Buccaneer.
The Firebrand was a looker, great name as well.



Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
The Blackburn Monoplane was/is very pretty


Eric Mc

124,944 posts

289 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
It's hard to be 100% consistent - but Blackburn really tried.