LNER Crash
Author
Discussion

surveyor

Original Poster:

18,620 posts

208 months

Thursday 14th November 2019
quotequote all

ecsrobin

18,528 posts

189 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
The link doesn’t like my ad blocker but some different photos than what BBC are showing here: https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2019/11/lner-disrupti...

davebem

747 posts

201 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Was the Azuma already derailed when the HST hit it? Or some coaches of the Azuma buckled and hit the dirt when the HST (which appears to be fully railed) impacted it?

StanleyT

1,994 posts

103 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Azuma hit HST. Azuma power car and therefore weight and momentum behind the driving vehicle, unlike the HST where the weight was in the vehicle hit. Hence the Azuma concertina. Hint always sit in the back half of a train to survive an accident. Unless the power car is right at the end (see Scotrail Cl47s pushmepullyous and cows and the class 91 and DVTs). In which case sit at the front. Unless it is a frontal impact, in which case use your car instead of a train.

T'is the difference in modern crash / crumple protection. Another Azuma is out of service after, sadly, a suicide, the body parts caused not dissimilar damage at the front and then damage to inter vehicle systems as they went under the train (that unit may be back up and running now, was a few weeks ago but defog went to NA for repair).

Nice to see the Pacer unharmed in Photo 2!

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

252 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Wow. Really getting into trains and sad to see these smashed up.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

182 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
StanleyT said:
.

T'is the difference in modern crash / crumple protection. Another Azuma is out of service after, sadly, a suicide, the body parts caused not dissimilar damage at the front and then damage to inter vehicle systems as they went under the train (that unit may be back up and running now, was a few weeks ago but defog went to NA for repair).

Nice to see the Pacer unharmed in Photo 2!
Yeah it's fixed, I did some of the work.

StanleyT

1,994 posts

103 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
StanleyT said:
.

T'is the difference in modern crash / crumple protection. Another Azuma is out of service after, sadly, a suicide, the body parts caused not dissimilar damage at the front and then damage to inter vehicle systems as they went under the train (that unit may be back up and running now, was a few weeks ago but defog went to NA for repair).

Nice to see the Pacer unharmed in Photo 2!
Yeah it's fixed, I did some of the work.
clap My best mates Dad at school got to recover the bodies off the rail line through our village - about 3/4 jumpers a year as the inter-cities came round a blind bend at full tt on a downhill if not stopping at the station. After they introduced HSTs "a jumpers head" could be a mile from the bridge they jumped at. Respect for what must be a grim job tidying up. But the trains seemed to run on.

Dogwatch

6,369 posts

246 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Now that really was a "shunt".


StanleyT said:
Nice to see the Pacer unharmed in Photo 2!
Typical of life really. New item, ruined (or at least spoilt). Old thing everyone would like to see the back of just keeps a-rollin'.

Including the 313/2s down here on Southern frown

FourWheelDrift

91,912 posts

308 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I saw LNER and thought a heritage steam loco had crashed.

dodsi2000

101 posts

96 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
StanleyT said:
.

T'is the difference in modern crash / crumple protection. Another Azuma is out of service after, sadly, a suicide, the body parts caused not dissimilar damage at the front and then damage to inter vehicle systems as they went under the train (that unit may be back up and running now, was a few weeks ago but defog went to NA for repair).

Nice to see the Pacer unharmed in Photo 2!
Yeah it's fixed, I did some of the work.
And I was on the train when it happened, quite a delay having left kings cross at 21:00 on 18 October... emergency evacuation onto the tracks and onto another train. Very sad situation but the staff were amazing.

anonymous-user

78 months

Saturday 7th December 2019
quotequote all
Azuma driver was distracted by the TMS (on board computer system).

In years gone by, BR and then subsequent operators kept a stock of spare HST cabs, such was the damage they tend to incur in a smash it was usually easier just to unbolt the old cab and stick a new one on. The supply ran out a few years back, the last few major incidents requiring cabs to be built to order or very heavily repaired. One of GWR's clobbered a tree around New Year 2018 (I think!), and became the first power car to be written off after cab damage; the end was already nigh and it just wasn't worth the bother.

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 7th December 20:47

Whatsmyname

944 posts

101 months

Saturday 7th December 2019
quotequote all



MartG

22,405 posts

228 months

Saturday 7th December 2019
quotequote all
Whatsmyname said:
Was the driver OK ?

Zad

12,948 posts

260 months

Sunday 8th December 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
The link doesn’t like my ad blocker but some different photos than what BBC are showing here: https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2019/11/lner-disrupti...
As an aside, the Johnson Press / JPI Media sites are a nightmare of adverts aren't they. I find the uBlock Origin ad blocker works well (for the moment anyway) on there. If they were more reasonable with their ads I wouldn't feel a need to use one, especially since I pay for one of their dead-tree papers.

RoverP6B

4,419 posts

152 months

Sunday 8th December 2019
quotequote all
I don't understand why they're scrapping HSTs, they're infinitely superior to their replacements and could easily be cascaded to secondary routes. They'd be most welcome on the Reading-Guildford-Redhill-Gatwick run!

surveyor

Original Poster:

18,620 posts

208 months

Sunday 8th December 2019
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
I don't understand why they're scrapping HSTs, they're infinitely superior to their replacements and could easily be cascaded to secondary routes. They'd be most welcome on the Reading-Guildford-Redhill-Gatwick run!
Some are surviving in the southwest and Scotland I think running in a smaller configuration

Dogwatch

6,369 posts

246 months

Sunday 8th December 2019
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
I don't understand why they're scrapping HSTs, they're infinitely superior to their replacements and could easily be cascaded to secondary routes. They'd be most welcome on the Reading-Guildford-Redhill-Gatwick run!
among the problems is the impending disability legislation plus, I think, the lavs dumping waste on the track. The cost of the upgrade would have to be factored into any continuation in service.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

91 months

Sunday 8th December 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Whatsmyname said:
Was the driver OK ?
yeah it was a branch linegetmecoat

legzr1

3,885 posts

163 months

Thursday 12th December 2019
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
I don't understand why they're scrapping HSTs, they're infinitely superior to their replacements and could easily be cascaded to secondary routes. They'd be most welcome on the Reading-Guildford-Redhill-Gatwick run!
There’s a chance you will see them running up and down the east and west coast as 125mph parcel trains once converted and contracts sorted.

Flying Phil

1,710 posts

169 months

Thursday 12th December 2019
quotequote all
EMR are still running HSTs on the Midland Main Line for at least the next two years.
We may even have the irony of a "Preserved HST" going over a "current HST" at Loughborough in 3 or 4 years time, if the Great Central Railway "Gap" is completed.....