Phantom vs Jaguar
Author
Discussion

GroundZero

Original Poster:

2,085 posts

78 months

Thursday 20th February 2020
quotequote all
I've been watching a lot of videos from this guy's channel, they are "bite sized" lengths of history with plenty of information thrown in.
One I watched recently raised an eyebrow of slight comedy to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14gUVN-jXuY


ottovonskidmark

169 posts

142 months

Thursday 20th February 2020
quotequote all
Dr Mark Felton. Excellent YouTube channel.

The History Guy is worth a look too.

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

303 months

Thursday 20th February 2020
quotequote all
Phantom pilot’s first thought - fk, is there any way I can pretend it wasn’t me?


Yertis

19,562 posts

290 months

Friday 21st February 2020
quotequote all
Does any one in the RAF ever refer to "one-four squadron" or "nine-two squadron"?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Friday 21st February 2020
quotequote all
No

IanH755

2,636 posts

144 months

Friday 21st February 2020
quotequote all
Most use Sqn nicknames which, depending on whether used by they're aircrew or groundcrew, could wither be a nice one, a boring one or a funny one.

56 Sqn becomes Shifty Fix Sqn.
31 Sqn becomes "The Brown Stars" due to the Gold Star image on their tails.
617 Sqn became Six Foot.
28 Sqn was called Freaks and Geeks

etc etc

Even the "Groundcrew Only" squadrons got involved so for example the AWACS groundcrew used to be called SLF for Sentry Line Flight, which changed to Sunshine and Laughter Flight because we travelled the world for 2-3 months every year. Then it became SMS for Sentry Maintenance Sqn which we changed to Serious Morale Shortage post 9/11 when we were spending upto 6 months in various deserts every year AND still covering the normal 2-3 months of "round the world" deployments too, so no-one saw home much, divorces raised dramatically and people quit the Sqn left, right and centre etc.

dr_gn

16,771 posts

208 months

Friday 21st February 2020
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Does any one in the RAF ever refer to "one-four squadron" or "nine-two squadron"?
Presumably different for numbers above 100? Nobody ever says "six hundred and seventeen squadron".

GOATever

2,651 posts

91 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
The Jag was curious. It was the only fighter aircraft ever to need assistance from the curvature of the earth to get airborne.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
GOATever said:
The Jag was curious. It was the only fighter aircraft ever to need assistance from the curvature of the earth to get airborne.
Fully laden Tornados were pretty pathetic towards the end of their lives.

GOATever

2,651 posts

91 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
Fully laden Tornados were pretty pathetic towards the end of their lives.
The Jag only needed both aircrew at the beginning of its life though. At least you had half a chance with the Tonka hehe




Edited by GOATever on Sunday 23 February 15:19

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
At the beginning of its life, the Tornado was a clean shape and light.

I’ve been told that the GR4s when operating from Khamis in the high mountains of western Saudi needed reheat at times while in circuit to LAND!

GOATever

2,651 posts

91 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
At the beginning of its life, the Tornado was a clean shape and light.

I’ve been told that the GR4s when operating from Khamis in the high mountains of western Saudi needed reheat at times while in circuit to LAND!
True enough, they had to come in swept as well. The Jags just would have crashed.

aeropilot

39,788 posts

251 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
GOATever said:
Tony1963 said:
At the beginning of its life, the Tornado was a clean shape and light.

I’ve been told that the GR4s when operating from Khamis in the high mountains of western Saudi needed reheat at times while in circuit to LAND!
True enough, they had to come in swept as well. The Jags just would have crashed.
Both were designed with low level ops as priority though.......hot n high was never in the design brief.

The Tonka F.3 supposedly often needed to use reheat at high level when prodding tankers.


Simpo Two

91,486 posts

289 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
At the beginning of its life, the Tornado was a clean shape and light.
I always felt it was too big to be a fighter and too small to be a bomber. Voila, the MRCA.

I've always liked Jaguars. Just the shape I think. And the weapon of choice for 'Squadron' on the TV when you could do things without being howled at by
liberals and 'activists'.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I always felt it was too big to be a fighter and too small to be a bomber. Voila, the MRCA.

I've always liked Jaguars. Just the shape I think. And the weapon of choice for 'Squadron' on the TV when you could do things without being howled at by
liberals and 'activists'.
Well, smaller than a V Bomber, but more effective. And excellent in F3 format as a loitering missile platform.

eccles

14,202 posts

246 months

Sunday 23rd February 2020
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
Most use Sqn nicknames which, depending on whether used by they're aircrew or groundcrew, could wither be a nice one, a boring one or a funny one.

56 Sqn becomes Shifty Fix Sqn.
31 Sqn becomes "The Brown Stars" due to the Gold Star image on their tails.
617 Sqn became Six Foot.
28 Sqn was called Freaks and Geeks

etc etc

Even the "Groundcrew Only" squadrons got involved so for example the AWACS groundcrew used to be called SLF for Sentry Line Flight, which changed to Sunshine and Laughter Flight because we travelled the world for 2-3 months every year. Then it became SMS for Sentry Maintenance Sqn which we changed to Serious Morale Shortage post 9/11 when we were spending upto 6 months in various deserts every year AND still covering the normal 2-3 months of "round the world" deployments too, so no-one saw home much, divorces raised dramatically and people quit the Sqn left, right and centre etc.
I was always surprised by how much mickey taking 'the management' let us get away with when it came to names.

I was on the Tornado Weapons Conversion Unit (TWCU pronounced Twickyou), We seemed to be the choice unit for giving VIP's jolleys when it came to Tornados, usually the last sortie on a Friday afternoon.. This involved washing the aircraft the Thursday night before, and white overall and light blue shirt and tie on the day.
Getting thoroughly sick of washing aircraft we ended up getting badges made saying TWCU, Tornado Washing and Cleaning Unit. There were quite a few raised eye brows, but nothing was said.

aeropilot

39,788 posts

251 months

Monday 24th February 2020
quotequote all
eccles said:
Getting thoroughly sick of washing aircraft we ended up getting badges made saying TWCU, Tornado Washing and Cleaning Unit.
laugh


GOATever

2,651 posts

91 months

Monday 24th February 2020
quotequote all
Something I didn’t know until very recently was that the Tonka that was being flown by John Peters and backseated by John Nicol, delivering JP233s to Ar Ruma, was ( so I’m reliably informed ) actually brought down by an American missile. The I.D. transponder was shot off, by small arms fire, and the ‘unidentifiable’ aircraft was taken down in a blue on blue. I don’t know if that’s actually what happened, but that’s what I’ve been told. It is contrary to everything that was ‘officially’ said though.

frodo_monkey

672 posts

220 months

Monday 24th February 2020
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
The Tonka F.3 supposedly often needed to use reheat at high level when prodding tankers.
Not so much in the F3, but routine in GR4... single burner on every plug, double blower verboten (but I’ve road-tested it). Plugging from a KC135 Boom-Drogue Adaptor (BDA) on the cusp of night at 28k over Afghanistan in double blower was necessary but character-building!

frodo_monkey

672 posts

220 months

Monday 24th February 2020
quotequote all
GOATever said:
Something I didn’t know until very recently was that the Tonka that was being flown by John Peters and backseated by John Nicol, delivering JP233s to Ar Ruma, was ( so I’m reliably informed ) actually brought down by an American missile. The I.D. transponder was shot off, by small arms fire, and the ‘unidentifiable’ aircraft was taken down in a blue on blue. I don’t know if that’s actually what happened, but that’s what I’ve been told. It is contrary to everything that was ‘officially’ said though.
I think you’re getting the JP/JN incident confused with the Patriot/GR4 ‘blue on blue’ from Iraq in 2003.