Firefighting aircraft
Discussion
MarkwG said:
Scotty2 said:
No Martin Mars then. Did Kermit ever complete the purchase?
They've not flown for a couple of years now, doubt they will. Superseded by the jet fleet I guess.Europa1 said:
MarkwG said:
Scotty2 said:
No Martin Mars then. Did Kermit ever complete the purchase?
They've not flown for a couple of years now, doubt they will. Superseded by the jet fleet I guess.After World War 2, firefighting aircraft fleets were drawn from the thousands of surplus American aircraft that were sitting around all over the US waiting to be scrapped . There was plenty to go around without looking for surplus aircraft from other parts of the world.
As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
Eric Mc said:
After World War 2, firefighting aircraft fleets were drawn from the thousands of surplus American aircraft that were sitting around all over the US waiting to be scrapped . There was plenty to go around without looking for surplus aircraft from other parts of the world.
As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
Indeed, Lancasters were put to other uses, photo reconnaissance etc. They weren't "surplus" in the same way the American fleet was.As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
MarkwG said:
Eric Mc said:
After World War 2, firefighting aircraft fleets were drawn from the thousands of surplus American aircraft that were sitting around all over the US waiting to be scrapped . There was plenty to go around without looking for surplus aircraft from other parts of the world.
As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
Indeed, Lancasters were put to other uses, photo reconnaissance etc. They weren't "surplus" in the same way the American fleet was.As a result, there was no need or incentive to use aircraft such as Lancasters, Halifaxes or Stirlings - all of which might have been suitable.
El stovey said:
Interesting that the 146 is good for them.
I suspect most people have seen this, but there's an amazing video of the RJ85 air tanker having a *very* near miss with a ridge after dropping a load of fire retardent. Watch the shadow...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2KCYhULWZ8
Having worked on 146s and RJs briefly at the start of my career, it's lovely to see them still out there filling niche roles.
I went to a lecture a couple of weeks ago about atmospheric research aircraft in the UK. Most of us are familiar with the specially converted Hercules (XV208 "Snoopy") that was sued for such research in years gone by. What many may not know is that there is a current research aircraft in use - and its a 146.


Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








