Bird 1 - A400 0 - I bet that hurt
Bird 1 - A400 0 - I bet that hurt
Author
Discussion

Trevatanus

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

174 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Happened yesterday apparently.
I imagine it made for a few interesting seconds for the co-pilots life.
https://airrecognition.com/index.php/news/defense-...

timbo999

1,507 posts

279 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
I expect the bird is none too pleased either...

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

7,353 posts

79 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Looks like they forgot to defrost them again.

Wonder what the hell they hit? Must have been goose sized looking at the damage.

Simpo Two

91,462 posts

289 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
And from lower down, how can a bird do this? Unless it's fired from an 88...


Krikkit

27,841 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
https://twitter.com/breakingavnews/status/12760988...

Couple more interior pics of the avionics. I'm guessing geese, tremendously expensive!

Simpo Two said:
And from lower down, how can a bird do this? Unless it's fired from an 88...
It's a very concentrated mass hitting a light structure at 500-600mph, there's only so much the materials can take. The average Canada Goose is around 3.7kg.

A good example is the Columbia shuttle loss - hit by a briefcase-sized ~2kg bit of foam at 700mph that broke through a reinforced carbon-carbon wing surface.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suniiico7z4

Edited by Krikkit on Thursday 25th June 17:50

croyde

25,645 posts

254 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Shocking but the hits look side on. Would have though that head on it would have just slid past unless hitting the fuselage at the front.

Then what do I know.

normalbloke

8,512 posts

243 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
croyde said:
Shocking but the hits look side on. Would have though that head on it would have just slid past unless hitting the fuselage at the front.

Then what do I know.
400kt crosswind..

bitchstewie

64,412 posts

234 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
What's that weird little door on the side next to the writing? confused

Huff

3,381 posts

215 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
It's where you reach in to remove the goose purée - i.e. you open it to take a gander.

Turn7

25,362 posts

245 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
What's that weird little door on the side next to the writing? confused
Dogflap....

Simpo Two

91,462 posts

289 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
It's a very concentrated mass hitting a light structure at 500-600mph, there's only so much the materials can take. The average Canada Goose is around 3.7kg.
Head on I can understand. But on the side?

SmoothCriminal

5,796 posts

223 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Are these things manufactured with bird scent on them or something as I'm sure the one on the red arrows programme got grounded by birds aswell when in America or Canada

Crumpet

5,043 posts

204 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
It's a very concentrated mass hitting a light structure at 500-600mph, there's only so much the materials can take. The average Canada Goose is around 3.7kg.

Edited by Krikkit on Thursday 25th June 17:50
Not to be a pedant, but it’s rather more likely they were doing less than 250kts at the time and, depending where they were on the approach, much less than that. I’ve taken a fair few birds in my time, some of them quite large (biggrin sorry), and all they’ve ever done is bounce off and leave a trail of blood, guts and the odd feather behind. It doesn’t look great that the structure has given way like that!

croyde

25,645 posts

254 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
One of the remarks on twitter says it may of hit a pilot which then ripped out along with bits and bobs but that wouldn't explain the bits of bird inside the aircraft.

Europa1

10,923 posts

212 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
croyde said:
One of the remarks on twitter says it may of hit a pilot which then ripped out along with bits and bobs but that wouldn't explain the bits of bird inside the aircraft.
May have hit. May have hit.

Write out a hundred times.

Sorry, but the whole "of" thing really yanks my chain.

LunarOne

6,955 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Small female pheasant weighing less than 1kg at 58mph...



At 5x that speed can you imagine? Granted it's head on, but an aircraft descending with a high angle of attack could still suffer a heavy bird strike to a lower surface!

eharding

14,648 posts

308 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
croyde said:
One of the remarks on twitter says it may of hit a pilot which then ripped out along with bits and bobs but that wouldn't explain the bits of bird inside the aircraft.
I think you mean "pitot".

At least I hope you do.

OFORBES

535 posts

124 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
Huff said:
It's where you reach in to remove the goose purée - i.e. you open it to take a gander.
It was good for a gander, but not for the goose in this case.

IanH755

2,634 posts

144 months

Thursday 25th June 2020
quotequote all
I think that what happened is this - the aircraft skin at that point isn't in line with the airflow and the skin is surprisingly thin, leading to a combination where the angle that the bird hit mixed with the thinness of the skin meant that the bird just punched through the skin into the aircraft just infront of the static vent and the hole left behind meant the airflow could then rip the static vent and it's "mini-ADC" electronics unit (see below) out of the airframe and into the airflow.

eharding said:
croyde said:
One of the remarks on twitter says it may of hit a pilot which then ripped out along with bits and bobs but that wouldn't explain the bits of bird inside the aircraft.
I think you mean "pitot".

At least I hope you do.
biggrin but to clarify the Twitter Comment, it's not a pitot probe thats been hit, it's a static vent from a "Smart-Probe" system - The pitot probe and TOAT are aft of those three static vents.

Here's a none-damaged aircraft with the static vent highlighted -



A Smart-Probe is the "new" way of measuring pitot/static/AOA/side-slip etc without extra weight/cost/bulk the more traditional way of connecting an Air Data Computer (ADC) to everything via pneumatic pipes. Instead the Smart Probes have a mini-ADC built into the back of each probe/vent so it only sends an electronic signal via wires rather than having to use pneumatic lines etc.

So far in military use they are usually only used as a tertiary system for things like an independent Height Cross Check monitor of the autopilot for TCAS certification etc as the secondary "standy-by" instruments still need to be directly linked to pitot/static via pneumatic pipes incase of power outages.

"Smart Probe chosen for A400M" - https://www.militaryaerospace.com/home/article/167...



Edited by IanH755 on Friday 26th June 00:50

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

210 months

Friday 26th June 2020
quotequote all
Well he won't do it again.