Bit windy out there...
Author
Discussion

bigandclever

Original Poster:

14,331 posts

267 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-london-60...

"A pilot was forced to make a 'touch and go' landing after encountering strong winds caused by Storm Corrie. The British Airways flight from Aberdeen came into trouble as it was trying to land at London Heathrow Airport. The rear of the plane appears to brush the runway before returning to the skies and then attempt a second landing. The plane eventually arrived safely in Heathrow."

Link has video.

48k

17,320 posts

177 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
Sporty!

mikey_b

2,649 posts

74 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
Was there a light tail strike when he pulled the nose up? Must have been very close if it wasn't.

saaby93

32,038 posts

207 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
Wasnt far off the wing catching the ground and spin around?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-60216196

JapanRed

1,591 posts

140 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
mikey_b said:
Was there a light tail strike when he pulled the nose up? Must have been very close if it wasn't.
Looks like it to me. Anyone know if that area of the plane is reinforced in case of incidents like this? What would happen if it did make contact with a bit of force?

dukeboy749r

3,726 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
Phenomenal skill.

Hats off to the pilot and co-pilot.

Bloody hell!

Electronicpants

3,089 posts

217 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all

MattyD803

2,397 posts

94 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
JapanRed said:
Looks like it to me. Anyone know if that area of the plane is reinforced in case of incidents like this? What would happen if it did make contact with a bit of force?
Yes, not only reinforced with a 'skid', but I also believe this area houses a sensor which tells the crew and subsequent maintenance teams the extent of any strikes to advise inspections.

I'm not a plane bod so I am sure someone will be along shortly with more information, but I think it is a fairly common occurrence and as such is 'managed'.

normalbloke

8,818 posts

248 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
JapanRed said:
mikey_b said:
Was there a light tail strike when he pulled the nose up? Must have been very close if it wasn't.
Looks like it to me. Anyone know if that area of the plane is reinforced in case of incidents like this? What would happen if it did make contact with a bit of force?
Yes, it’s reinforced and usually has a sacrificial strip on it. It’s also where the arrestor hook is stowed.

mikey_b

2,649 posts

74 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
Yes, it’s reinforced and usually has a sacrificial strip on it. It’s also where the arrestor hook is stowed.
confused

Beyond Rational

3,544 posts

244 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
No doubt there are also skidmarks at the front of the plane as well

Ledaig

1,806 posts

291 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
mikey_b said:
normalbloke said:
Yes, it’s reinforced and usually has a sacrificial strip on it. It’s also where the arrestor hook is stowed.
confused
It's for rapid troop deployment on carriers, well it would have been if we'd gone cat and trap but let's not go there.....

808 Estate

2,656 posts

120 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
Good bit of flying.

Shame BBC dont know the difference between a "Touch & Go" and a "Go Around",

LP12

257 posts

65 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
808 Estate said:
Good bit of flying.
Good flying? Quite the reverse! Absolutely appalling airmanship.

That approach should have been thrown away much earlier.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
808 Estate said:
Good bit of flying.

Shame BBC dont know the difference between a "Touch & Go" and a "Go Around",
Consider yourself lucky they actually identified it as an aircraft.
“BBC” and “aviation” aren’t words I’d naturally put together.

caiss4

1,945 posts

226 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
LP12 said:
Good flying? Quite the reverse! Absolutely appalling airmanship.

That approach should have been thrown away much earlier.
Why?

marksx

5,174 posts

219 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
No more than a breeze at Leeds Bradford that.

saaby93

32,038 posts

207 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
LP12 said:
808 Estate said:
Good bit of flying.
Good flying? Quite the reverse! Absolutely appalling airmanship.

That approach should have been thrown away much earlier.
At what point were the fans upped? or are they kept high and control done with flaps etc?

Still looks like some luck

Katzenjammer

1,255 posts

207 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
MattyD803 said:
JapanRed said:
Looks like it to me. Anyone know if that area of the plane is reinforced in case of incidents like this? What would happen if it did make contact with a bit of force?
Yes, not only reinforced with a 'skid', but I also believe this area houses a sensor which tells the crew and subsequent maintenance teams the extent of any strikes to advise inspections.

I'm not a plane bod so I am sure someone will be along shortly with more information, but I think it is a fairly common occurrence and as such is 'managed'.
There’s a range of damage that can occur with a tail strike From heavy abrasion, dents, skin perforation, drain mast removal, antenna breakage, APU intake damage, rear pressure bulkhead buckling…



Katzenjammer

1,255 posts

207 months

Tuesday 1st February 2022
quotequote all
808 Estate said:
Good bit of flying.

Shame BBC dont know the difference between a "Touch & Go" and a "Go Around",
This one was a touch, touch, touch, scrape, and go around.