B-21 Raider
Author
Discussion

Silver3ides

Original Poster:

1,802 posts

254 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Not long to go now for the live reveal @ 01.00 (UK time) Saturday Morning from Northrop Grummans Palmdale production facility

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chJlJgrvfBY

Simpo Two

92,599 posts

294 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.

16v_paddy

368 posts

221 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Well it's technically going forward as it's the replacement for the B1 and the B2

Simpo Two

92,599 posts

294 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
16v_paddy said:
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Well it's technically going forward as it's the replacement for the B1 and the B2
Marketing, I expect. And 'B3' was too logical. Like there's no Aston Martin DB8 'cos they said people would think it had 8 cylinders... nobody complained about the 5-cylinder DB5!

Evanivitch

26,279 posts

151 months

Thursday 1st December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
After the B1 and the B2 US military stealth technology rapidly improved, so much so that they can't remember where they left B3-B20. It's only now they've put an Air Tag in the B-21 that they've managed not to lose it.

LotusOmega375D

9,298 posts

182 months

Friday 2nd December 2022
quotequote all
Thanks for the teaser, but I think I’m going to hang on for a test flight before putting down a deposit.

ecsrobin

18,628 posts

194 months

Friday 2nd December 2022
quotequote all
A bargain at $2 billion a jet.

ChemicalChaos

10,712 posts

189 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
B-21... why is the numbering going backwards? 17 - 24 - 29 - 52 etc... to name a few.
Numbering in all the classes (B, F, A) is all over the place because they have been arbitrarily "reset" several times over the years. I can't remember the reason now I'm afraid but I did find out once in the past.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
What we got to see if it, front on, wasn’t too exciting. It basically looked like a tweaked B-2.

ecsrobin

18,628 posts

194 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
What we got to see if it, front on, wasn’t too exciting. It basically looked like a tweaked B-2.
Probably because that’s still the best design.

IanH755

2,760 posts

149 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
This article from "The Drive: Warzone" has some good images - https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/this-is-the-...

It looks like the lovechild between a B-2 (design) and an F-35 (avionics) in a much smaller package, I just hope (as is always in these modern times) that enough can be bought to prevent this becoming another F-22, B-2, Zumwalt issue of "Great idea but nowhere near enough bought, making each one hugely expensive and irreplaceable in a peer war".

Muddle238

4,413 posts

142 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Thanks for the teaser, but I think I’m going to hang on for a test flight before putting down a deposit.
No doubt in keeping with most new models nowadays, it’ll only be available in some shade of grey.

I’d be interested if I could have it in British Racing Green with a cream leather interior.

S600BSB

8,221 posts

135 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Looks quite similar to a B-2.

bitchstewie

67,105 posts

239 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all

sherman

15,190 posts

244 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Could the numbering just be because of prototypes that never officially left Area 51 for example?

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
For comparison


Tango13

10,042 posts

205 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
For comparison

Interesting... The original design for the B-2 lacked the trailing edge serrations and was much closer to the B-21 in plan view.

Petrus1983

11,123 posts

191 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
Stunning.

My biggest issue with it is the only way for them to justify the cost is for finding a way to use them.

shouldbworking

4,801 posts

241 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
The whole nuclear triad thing doesn't make sense to me. Yeah, submarines have their deficiencies, but compared to land or air options they are far better, so how do you justify the cost for this?

Evanivitch

26,279 posts

151 months

Saturday 3rd December 2022
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
The whole nuclear triad thing doesn't make sense to me. Yeah, submarines have their deficiencies, but compared to land or air options they are far better, so how do you justify the cost for this?
Because it also has a non-nuclear strike capability that many nations lack the ability of. Like the UK has no strategic strike capability. At best we'd launch a bunch of tomahawks from a submarine and hope a few make it through a capable air defence system.