NASA X-59 “low boom” supersonic aircraft unveiled
Discussion
Exciting news in supersonic aviation. Whilst it’s been known about for a while, with various images and renderings floating around, the actual aircraft has been officially unveiled at the Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks. Designed to go Mach 1.4 with a sonic boom like “a car door closing”, it’s potentially a real game changer for commercial aviation. No windscreen so fly by cctv is an interesting feature.
Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.
Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.
Edited by dvs_dave on Saturday 13th January 17:41
dvs_dave said:
Exciting news in supersonic aviation. Whilst it’s been known about for a while, with various images and renderings floating around, the actual aircraft has been officially unveiled at the Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks. Designed to go Mach 1.4 with a sonic boom like “a car door closing”, it’s potentially a real game changer for commercial aviation. No windscreen so fly by cctv is an interesting feature.
Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78TiuVspxOac[/youtube]
Direct link in case YouTube embed isn’t working.
https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78...
Scroll forward to 21 minutes if you want to skip the blather. I think they skimped on the dry ice budget. Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78TiuVspxOac[/youtube]
Direct link in case YouTube embed isn’t working.
https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78...

Edited by hidetheelephants on Saturday 13th January 17:27
bergclimber34 said:
Looks like a 16 exhaust nozzle?
I read it somewhere that they have designed it to use as much "off the shelf" components as possible to reduce the complexity and development time. Landing gear, avionics, engine etc I can't recall what came from what off the top of my head.
Buzz84 said:
I read it somewhere that they have designed it to use as much "off the shelf" components as possible to reduce the complexity and development time.
Landing gear, avionics, engine etc I can't recall what came from what off the top of my head.
It’s an F414, so presumably reusing a Super Hornet setup. Landing gear, avionics, engine etc I can't recall what came from what off the top of my head.
Simpo Two said:
What's the point of it? It's not an airliner, it's more like a prototype fighter. Do they wish to avoid hurting the enemy's ears?
As the BAC 221 was to Concorde, the X-59 is hoped to be a proof of concept to the next generation of SSTs. The BAC 221 (a rebuilt Fairey Delta) was used to test Concorde's wing section, and this thing is supposed to test techniques to allow overland supersonic transits of the US without annoying everyone by dropping bangs on them.I can very vaguely remember as a small child falling off my chair in the conservatory of the house my parents had in Truro as a result of an almighty bang from a supersonic test. Would have been 1969, maybe 1968 or early 1970.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





