The Red October (sort of)...
Discussion
Came across these....how much do you think it would take to buy one (not that they'd let you) and do it up for your own private transport? £1 billion? Shame to see them rotting away...it says they're in reserve.
http://community.livejournal.com/ru_submarine/1748...
http://community.livejournal.com/ru_submarine/1748...
That is huge.
I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
Severodvinsk

I can see 3 Typhoons..but i can't find the location of the 3 parallel jetties shown in the photos linked above. Might be an older image on Google maps.

I can see 3 Typhoons..but i can't find the location of the 3 parallel jetties shown in the photos linked above. Might be an older image on Google maps.
Smiler. said:
That is huge.
I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
That isn't an Alfa, it's a Foxtrot class Diesel-Electric sub. Alfas were an altogether different beast. They were powered by a liquid metal cooled reactor and were the fastest and deepest diving submarines in service - they could do over 40 knots and dive extremely deep due to their titanium hulls.I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
The Foxtrot was contemporary to the Oberon class subs in the Royal Navy, of which there is one you can visit at the historic docks at Chatham.
That Typhoon in the first link looks a bit of a mess.
Edited by tank slapper on Sunday 7th February 17:17
Maxymillion said:
Was the Kursk a Typhoon class? I was surprised to see it looking in that state, if its in reserve surely it needs to be in better order than that?
Kursk was an Oscar II class, which is a cruise missile carrier rather than a ballistic missile boat, although they are still quite large. They are of comparable size to our Vanguard class SSBNs. They were designed to attack American carrier battle groups.
You can see the missile tubes running down the sides of the boat, under the open hatches.
tank slapper said:
Smiler. said:
That is huge.
I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
That isn't an Alfa, it's a Foxtrot class Diesel-Electric sub. Alfas were an altogether different beast. They were powered by a liquid metal cooled reactor and were the fastest and deepest diving submarines in service - they could do over 40 knots and dive extremely deep due to their titanium hulls.I went aboard this Alfa Class sub when it was moored at the Thames barrier.
http://www.sovietsub.co.uk/about.html
Not in the same league, but I was amazed at how antiquated everything looked - and cramped.
The Foxtrot was contemporary to the Oberon class subs in the Royal Navy, of which there is one you can visit at the historic docks at Chatham.
That Typhoon in the first link looks a bit of a mess.
Edited by tank slapper on Sunday 7th February 17:17
tstorm in the west. We ended up with the spearfish torp as a result of the ensuing panic.The liquid metal used was a lead bizmuth-alloy, which although in theory is an ideal primary coolant / heat exchange medium it has a couple of fatal flaws. The reactor could not be shut down unless it was connected to a shore side steam plant. Without these shore-side services the core would freeze writing off the plant if the reactor was shut down. There were also void problems in the coolant channels which could lead to cladding damage.
Like a lot of cold war era projects - 'twas good in theory.
IIRC the Typhoon class boats are the biggest submarines ever built, bigger than the Ohio class boats in the US.
I know one probably shouldn't get sentimental about such a thing but looking through those pics (excellent find BTW!!!!) i couldn't help but feel a little sad. I really can't see that boat ever putting to sea again, quite sad. The Russian navy does have at least one operational Typhoon though doesn't it? sure i've read that somewhere.
Oh and Hunt for Red October is one of my top 5 films....off the back of it i bought a Russian Naval Officers greatcoat, exactly as our Marco wears!! the thing must weigh 5 or 6 kilos!! Brilliant coat!
I know one probably shouldn't get sentimental about such a thing but looking through those pics (excellent find BTW!!!!) i couldn't help but feel a little sad. I really can't see that boat ever putting to sea again, quite sad. The Russian navy does have at least one operational Typhoon though doesn't it? sure i've read that somewhere.
Oh and Hunt for Red October is one of my top 5 films....off the back of it i bought a Russian Naval Officers greatcoat, exactly as our Marco wears!! the thing must weigh 5 or 6 kilos!! Brilliant coat!
rhinochopig said:
The liquid metal used was a lead bizmuth-alloy, which although in theory is an ideal primary coolant / heat exchange medium it has a couple of fatal flaws. The reactor could not be shut down unless it was connected to a shore side steam plant. Without these shore-side services the core would freeze writing off the plant if the reactor was shut down. There were also void problems in the coolant channels which could lead to cladding damage.
They could never make the shore side plants work properly, so they ended up having to have the reactors powered up all the time which made maintenance a lot harder. Several of them ended up being decommissioned because their reactors froze accidentally.MartG said:
tank slapper said:
That Typhoon in the first link looks a bit of a mess.
I think all the rusty bits are inside the conning tower - that isn't part of the pressure hull and is allowed to flood when the submarine dives, hence the condition of the paintwork etc.bumblebee said:
Severodvinsk

I can see 3 Typhoons..but i can't find the location of the 3 parallel jetties shown in the photos linked above. Might be an older image on Google maps.
I'd suggest it is here, north west of Murmansk ...
I can see 3 Typhoons..but i can't find the location of the 3 parallel jetties shown in the photos linked above. Might be an older image on Google maps.
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&a...
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



they are much bigger than i imagined 