Stupid Question?
Author
Discussion

juan king

Original Poster:

1,093 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
So this is what crap is floating around my head today, really important I'm sure you will agree.

This may be a stupid question or not? I know that trains do not cope with inclines very well. So what's different about trams? I've noticed that where the Supertram (Sheffield) goes underneath the university roundabout, The tracks are on maybe 30 degree incline.

A train would never manage to climb that.


anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
juan king said:
So this is what crap is floating around my head today, really important I'm sure you will agree.

This may be a stupid question or not? I know that trains do not cope with inclines very well. So what's different about trams? I've noticed that where the Supertram (Sheffield) goes underneath the university roundabout, The tracks are on maybe 30 degree incline.

A train would never manage to climb that.
I can only assume it is down to weight difference. I assume the tram is lighter, and so that is why it can do the climb.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Are the trams on a conveyor belt?

Sour Kraut

45,899 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No silly. That's a plane.

moosepig

1,306 posts

270 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
30 degrees? yikes

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Sour Kraut said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No silly. That's a plane.
A plane on a conveyor belt? Are you mad, that would never take off!! wink

Sour Kraut

45,899 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No silly. That's a plane.
A plane on a conveyor belt? Are you mad, that would never take off!! wink
Not sure. Definitely wouldn't go under the Sheffield underpass, though.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
NO mate, on rails a'la blackpool,nottingham,wolverhampton,manchester and amsterdam.

juan king

Original Poster:

1,093 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
moosepig said:
30 degrees? yikes
This was the only image I could find and doesn't really show it well.


anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
snowy slopes said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
NO mate, on rails a'la blackpool,nottingham,wolverhampton,manchester and amsterdam.
One of us needs a whoosh....

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
anonymous said:
[redacted]
NO mate, on rails a'la blackpool,nottingham,wolverhampton,manchester and amsterdam.
One of us needs a whoosh....
Probably me, so

juan king

Original Poster:

1,093 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Found another image that illustrates my point entirely




strudel

5,889 posts

256 months

Tony2or4

1,283 posts

194 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
snowy slopes said:
juan king said:
So this is what crap is floating around my head today, really important I'm sure you will agree.

This may be a stupid question or not? I know that trains do not cope with inclines very well. So what's different about trams? I've noticed that where the Supertram (Sheffield) goes underneath the university roundabout, The tracks are on maybe 30 degree incline.

A train would never manage to climb that.
I can only assume it is down to weight difference. I assume the tram is lighter, and so that is why it can do the climb.
I don't think weight difference can be the reason, because if you reduce the weight then you also reduce pro rata the amount of friction available twixt wheels and track.

I think the wheel/track contact surface must be rougher (ie more friction available) than for a train - either that or could it be that a train really could climb that slope?

juan king

Original Poster:

1,093 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
strudel said:
it was a joke

strudel

5,889 posts

256 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
FYI the trams are about 44t I seem to recall.

Amused2death

2,525 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
juan king said:
moosepig said:
30 degrees? yikes
This was the only image I could find and doesn't really show it well.

Looking at the angle between the brickwork and the road surface in the left of the picture it looks a lot less than 30 degrees, I'd say nearer 15, though still quite a climb.....maybe they take a run-up biggrin

43034

2,971 posts

197 months

dr_gn

16,923 posts

213 months

Wednesday 12th January 2011
quotequote all
juan king said:
moosepig said:
30 degrees? yikes
This was the only image I could find and doesn't really show it well.

That's just before the University stop, it's nothing like 30 degrees! It's a bit of an illusion because the track is emerging onto a downhill stretch, which makes the angle look much steeper. The maximum gradient on the Sheffield Supertram network is 10%, about 5.71 degrees.

juan king

Original Poster:

1,093 posts

218 months

Wednesday 12th January 2011
quotequote all
I stand corrected!