BBQ Charcoal Briquettes
Discussion
Just getting into BBQ'ing myself and have got a Weber one touch with the chimney starter and some other accessories. I wanted to find out what charcoal you guys recommend - especially for me as a beginner.
I have bought a bag of Weber's own, but it's quite pricey. Is there a good price/quality brand out there thats available quite easily?
Ta
I have bought a bag of Weber's own, but it's quite pricey. Is there a good price/quality brand out there thats available quite easily?
Ta
Seight_Returns said:
Prefer lumpwood charcoal to briquettes - has to be be big chuncks though - the small stuff burns up in no time. As above Big K sell the good stuff.
Good call on the chimney starter - it took me years of paraffin tainted burgers to work out that a chimney is the way to do it.
I used to have a local DIY chain chimney starter and compared to that the weber one is massive and quite well engineered. I just wish i'd gone for the heatproof mitts as well now.Good call on the chimney starter - it took me years of paraffin tainted burgers to work out that a chimney is the way to do it.
Damn, this hobby looks like it's going to get expensive, and I haven't bought any meat yet!
escargot said:
Lumpwood isn't great for kettle barbecues like webers though. It's more difficult to regulate temperature and as it burns and breaks down, the bits fall through the grate at the bottom.
That is useful information - thanks. I've got some easy-light-in-the-bag lumpwood charcoal as well and I was reading another PH post that you can get the best of both worlds by having a layer of briquettes with a layer of lumpwood on top. Not sure how well that would work.the weber briquettes are slightly more expensive but they certainly last longer than anything else I have tried, i can normally get 3 bbq's out of a one bag.
i tried lump wood last week as my local shop was out of weber and they were OK but did not last long enough for doing large joints of meat the in-direct method, but fine for direct cooking
if you see the uber expensive jack daniels charcoal then stay well clear, didn't burn long enough and noticed no difference from using wood chips on standard coal.
i tried lump wood last week as my local shop was out of weber and they were OK but did not last long enough for doing large joints of meat the in-direct method, but fine for direct cooking
if you see the uber expensive jack daniels charcoal then stay well clear, didn't burn long enough and noticed no difference from using wood chips on standard coal.
s1962a said:
escargot said:
Lumpwood isn't great for kettle barbecues like webers though. It's more difficult to regulate temperature and as it burns and breaks down, the bits fall through the grate at the bottom.
That is useful information - thanks. I've got some easy-light-in-the-bag lumpwood charcoal as well and I was reading another PH post that you can get the best of both worlds by having a layer of briquettes with a layer of lumpwood on top. Not sure how well that would work.The beauty of the weber is in its ability to cook indirectly and for which, briquettes are the only real choice.
escargot said:
s1962a said:
escargot said:
Lumpwood isn't great for kettle barbecues like webers though. It's more difficult to regulate temperature and as it burns and breaks down, the bits fall through the grate at the bottom.
That is useful information - thanks. I've got some easy-light-in-the-bag lumpwood charcoal as well and I was reading another PH post that you can get the best of both worlds by having a layer of briquettes with a layer of lumpwood on top. Not sure how well that would work.The beauty of the weber is in its ability to cook indirectly and for which, briquettes are the only real choice.
Gassing Station | Food, Drink & Restaurants | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



