Stupid Food Warnings
Author
Discussion

Supernova190188

Original Poster:

933 posts

168 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
What the hell is it with stupid warnings, I just noticed on the back of a 20kg bag of peanuts meant for birds that there is a warning saying 'may contain nuts' , well of course it contains fking nuts, it's a bag of nuts! I'd be pretty pissed off if it didn't contain any, surely if you are that stupid that you are allergic to nuts and then go and eat a large bag of peanuts meant for birds then you would have been removed from the gene pool a long time ago.

mrsshpub

929 posts

213 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
That's even worse than the warning on packs of cheese that say it 'Contains milk'........

obob

4,193 posts

223 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
Peanuts aren't nuts you 'tard.

Xaero

4,063 posts

244 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
obob said:
Peanuts aren't nuts.
T'is true, they are legumes. So your bag of peanuts likely doesn't contain nuts at all, but 'may' if they were processed in a factory which handles them of course.

Shaw Tarse

31,884 posts

232 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
Supernova190188 said:
What the hell is it with stupid warnings, I just noticed on the back of a 20kg bag of peanuts meant for birds that there is a warning saying 'may contain nuts' , well of course it contains fking nuts, it's a bag of nuts! I'd be pretty pissed off if it didn't contain any, surely if you are that stupid that you are allergic to nuts and then go and eat a large bag of peanuts meant for birds then you would have been removed from the gene pool a long time ago.
obob said:
Peanuts aren't nuts you 'tard.
Not the first time this has been mentioned.

Benbay001

5,886 posts

186 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
obob said:
Peanuts aren't nuts you 'tard.
Well.. you learn something new every day, dont you?
getmecoat

Mojooo

13,291 posts

209 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
There are strict labelling rules around allergies - so what if the odd occasions means a label has to be provided when it is obvious - there will be hudnreds of times when it is not so obvious.

folos

900 posts

171 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all
One that gets me on a local radio station with messages sponsored by an e-cigarette company. They claim that it "may contain nicotine" Of course it fking contains nicotine!!! MAY contain... ffs!

wijit

1,512 posts

204 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
There are strict labelling rules around allergies - so what if the odd occasions means a label has to be provided when it is obvious - there will be hundreds of times when it is not so obvious.
This.
The legislation now regarding labelling is such that right down to the order in which ingredients are listed can land a manufacturer in serious trouble. Peanuts may not strictly speaking be a nut, but they are an incredibly high risk allergen, as such the generic term "nuts" is used as a cover all. Coconut is not a nuts, nor (in the UK)is it an allergen but still to avoid all doubt some manufacturers are putting the "May contain nuts" label on goods containing Coconut.
In an increasingly litigious society you can hardly blame food producers from erring on the edge of caution. Being in the food technology side of food production I can absolutely confirm it is next to impossible to just keep up with legislation. You now have to pre-empt it due to the way packaging is ordered. From that aspect I think a greater understanding is required before deciding allergen warnings are stupid, even if the thread title can be right about other labels.

escargot

17,123 posts

246 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all
folos said:
One that gets me on a local radio station with messages sponsored by an e-cigarette company. They claim that it "may contain nicotine" Of course it fking contains nicotine!!! MAY contain... ffs!
Not all of the liquids do.

folos

900 posts

171 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all
escargot said:
Not all of the liquids do.
The product itself "may contain nicotine"

MDJ

155 posts

201 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all

Mojooo

13,291 posts

209 months

Sunday 12th January 2014
quotequote all
The law says 'fish' must be declared as an allergen (some products may contain fish but the species may not be obvious or named - in which case the general desciption of fish can be used to describe the ingredient.

As tuna is in the name/ingredients they probably dont need a seperate warning - infact the seperate warning is voluntary anyway - but I am guessing they have included it as it is standard packaging and some products that are similar will include other allergenes that may not be obvious - so it is easier to retain the packaging style.

the reason they have used the word FISH as opposed to TUNA is because the law refers to FISH and it is easier/makes sense to use the legal wording.

So there is a reason for this 'madness'.