Mercury music awards
Discussion
Traditionally the Mercury has been about giving newer, more niche artist a bit of a leg up to a wider audience and lifting album sales of more 'indepedant' labels/artists.
Bowie should not really have even been nominated, and someone like Skepta is much more in line with the ethos of the whole process IMO.
Bowie should not really have even been nominated, and someone like Skepta is much more in line with the ethos of the whole process IMO.
robbocop33 said:
So it came down to David Bowie or a ten a penny rapper who set fire to his family home who we 'won't' hear about for the next 50 days,nevermind years!
What's the world coming to?
Irrespective of how good Blackstar is, who do you think David Bowie would have liked the award to go to ?What's the world coming to?
North West Tom said:
Ask yourself if Bowie would have even been nominated if he hadn't died.
He has been nominated for/won things while he was 'living',you are aware of that??I think Bowie himself,as Jarvis Cocker himself said,he would have probably approved of giving the award to an up and coming artist rather than himself,i just question it being 'that' artist?
Honestly, Skeptas album wasn't even the best Grime album on this list (Kano - 'Made in the Manor' is seriously good) but as a DIY musician whos attitudes and ethos are more "Punk" than half the guitar based bands out there nowadays who act that way but hide behind great PR etc. and the effect he's had on his demographic and wider, it's harsh to describe him as just another rapper
Gassing Station | Music | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



