9.0 ltr quad cam twin turbo V8 in an Ultima!
9.0 ltr quad cam twin turbo V8 in an Ultima!
Author
Discussion

chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
Yes as the titles says, please see the below link for a Mercury Marine racing 9.0 ltr quad cam twin turbo V8 (about 1600bhp normal fuel) in an Ultima GTR! Bonkers!

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-forced-inductio...

(towards the bottom of the page)

Chris.

Kawasicki

14,129 posts

258 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
'bout time.....cooling might be an issue.

chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
I didnt say it was a good idea! lol

UltimaCH

3,181 posts

212 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
That certainly looks hairy eek

RSoovy4

35,829 posts

294 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all


chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
UltimaCH said:
That certainly looks hairy eek
The marine engines are torque limited to save transmissions. But it's still a massive amount! Can see why they have slickson the car!

F.C.

3,899 posts

231 months

Friday 8th November 2013
quotequote all
Well that is a corker!
No mention of transmission type but this engine IS available and intended for automobile use, 1300 odd BHP on pump gas.
20-30% fuel efficiency saving over similarly rated engines.... rofl enough gas in our tanks to go to the shops and back I'd imagine hehe

Boostaddiction

16 posts

184 months

Saturday 9th November 2013
quotequote all
F.C. said:
Well that is a corker!
No mention of transmission type but this engine IS available and intended for automobile use, 1300 odd BHP on pump gas.
20-30% fuel efficiency saving over similarly rated engines.... rofl enough gas in our tanks to go to the shops and back I'd imagine hehe
The car has a Ricardo transaxle. It appears to have been built without regard to cost, and not driven, as far as I could tell.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

278 months

Saturday 9th November 2013
quotequote all
Holy snot...

MattYorke

4,495 posts

276 months

Sunday 10th November 2013
quotequote all
Where did you read that?

chuntington101 said:
The marine engines are torque limited to save transmissions.

chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Sunday 10th November 2013
quotequote all
MattYorke said:
On mercuary's site. I was looking at their TT racing boat engines and the 1350s have a flat torque curve and there is a q&a somewhere that says the boost is varied throughout the rpm range so sounds like torque management to me. Could be spouting BS though. Lol

I think the turbos they use are VNT / VGT units. Be intresting to see how fast they spooled on a car. Also intresting to see if they can cope with the heat as the boat engines run water cooled exhaust manifolds.

MHunter

125 posts

214 months

Sunday 10th November 2013
quotequote all
It is apparently a crate engine, selling for $65,000.

F.C.

3,899 posts

231 months

Sunday 10th November 2013
quotequote all
MHunter said:
It is apparently a crate engine, selling for $65,000.
It's a snip! nono

MattYorke

4,495 posts

276 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
The challenge of marine engines to is quite different to that of road engines - basically a marine engine is all about torque. They want a nice broad, flat, torque curve, which is why diesels suit so well. The challenge with a turbo motor is usually getting it on boost at all - ideally you want an unwastegated turbo (since they tend to burn the wastegates out), but then getting the turbo on boost enough to get the boat up and running enough for the motor to make boost is a challenge in itself - it's chicken and egg, hence why superchargers are common (iirc some of the volvo marine engines have both a supercharger and a turbo). This merc motor is lovely though and looks like a strong competitor to the turbine crowd.

There are drives that will take more or less any torque number you can throw at them - have a look for arneson.

chuntington101 said:
Words

F.C.

3,899 posts

231 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
MattYorke said:
The challenge of marine engines to is quite different to that of road engines - basically a marine engine is all about torque. They want a nice broad, flat, torque curve, which is why diesels suit so well. The challenge with a turbo motor is usually getting it on boost at all - ideally you want an unwastegated turbo (since they tend to burn the wastegates out), but then getting the turbo on boost enough to get the boat up and running enough for the motor to make boost is a challenge in itself - it's chicken and egg, hence why superchargers are common (iirc some of the volvo marine engines have both a supercharger and a turbo). This merc motor is lovely though and looks like a strong competitor to the turbine crowd.

There are drives that will take more or less any torque number you can throw at them - have a look for arneson.

chuntington101 said:
Words
Hmm... but that's no Diesel though.

chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
MattYorke said:
The challenge of marine engines to is quite different to that of road engines - basically a marine engine is all about torque. They want a nice broad, flat, torque curve, which is why diesels suit so well. The challenge with a turbo motor is usually getting it on boost at all - ideally you want an unwastegated turbo (since they tend to burn the wastegates out), but then getting the turbo on boost enough to get the boat up and running enough for the motor to make boost is a challenge in itself - it's chicken and egg, hence why superchargers are common (iirc some of the volvo marine engines have both a supercharger and a turbo). This merc motor is lovely though and looks like a strong competitor to the turbine crowd.

There are drives that will take more or less any torque number you can throw at them - have a look for arneson.

chuntington101 said:
Words
Matt, why would no wastegates help the turbos spool faster? Wastegates are there only to reduce drive presure and thus limit boost presure. The wastegates have nothing to do with spooling the turbo(s) and they will be shut at low rpm and boost presures anyway.

The turbos pictured don't have wastegates because they are VNT / VGT turbos (can't remember which they use). These turbos constantly alter the AR on the turbine side to control boost and reduce spool.

MattYorke

4,495 posts

276 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
They don't. The issue with marine (especially race) engines is the high duty cycle tends to burn wastegates out pretty quickly and you then can't get on boost at all - it's just a case that you don't want to design a weak spot in - which has obviously been considered in the design of these.



chuntington101

Original Poster:

5,733 posts

259 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
MattYorke said:
They don't. The issue with marine (especially race) engines is the high duty cycle tends to burn wastegates out pretty quickly and you then can't get on boost at all - it's just a case that you don't want to design a weak spot in - which has obviously been considered in the design of these.
But on a marine application the EGTs are lower anyway thanks to the water cooled manifolds. You can even get water cooled wastegates these days. Why would the wastegates get 'burnt'?

I can see why the waste gates get high duty as the engines will be at max power for long periods of time (gates open).

MattYorke

4,495 posts

276 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
I think part 2 of your reply answers part 1.
Max throttle, Max EGT, open wastegate in one of the hotter parts of the exhaust means no cooling to the valve (even if the body is cooled)

I can only speak based on my observations and conversations with people who have built way more engines than me - but SwipeWipes burnt a wastegate in the CTC race one year and have now switched to wastegateless turbos (and correspondingly long spool up time to get on the plane and on boost).

spatz

1,783 posts

209 months

Monday 11th November 2013
quotequote all
I understand the whole idea is to get a good boost at lower rpms which means the wastegate will open early to limit overall boost (not an expert but I assume the amount of boost is somehow linear related to the amount of exhaust gases going throuth the turbine). In diesel engines they use variable turbine geometry so I assume they are using those in the diesel PENTA engines, why not in the turbo charged V8 world ?